11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

246 Unemployment and Monetary Policy in the European Union<br />

in Europe such employment was cut <strong>of</strong>f as a result <strong>of</strong> minimum wages and was<br />

instead reflected in unemployment. That could account for the higher growth in<br />

U.S. employment and also for the smaller growth in real wages and productivity.<br />

So qualitatively it provides an explanation <strong>of</strong> the facts different from mine,<br />

but also different from the conventional view, in that the differential behavior is<br />

not the result <strong>of</strong> strong unions but instead <strong>of</strong> the economic effects <strong>of</strong> minimum<br />

wages. But it is questionable whether the minimum wage provision could account<br />

for much <strong>of</strong> the differential behavior <strong>of</strong> employment and unemployment since<br />

the 1970s, for, as pointed out in the CEPR reports, it is neither a new institution<br />

nor one specific to Europe (though it has been quantitatively more important<br />

there.)<br />

Be this as it may, it would be hopeless to try to measure how much, if any,<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the supposed supply effects contributed to the rise in unemployment. I<br />

propose instead to rely on a rather different construct known as the Beveridge<br />

curve. I will demonstrate how this device can be used to measure the total number<br />

<strong>of</strong> job openings in the economy and to estimate to what extent variations in unemployment<br />

can be traced back to changes in jobs (demand effects) and to other<br />

causes (supply effects).<br />

3 Tests <strong>of</strong> the Role <strong>of</strong> Demand Based on Beveridge Curve Tests<br />

3.1 The Beveridge Curve<br />

The Beveridge curve can be derived from two basic hypotheses. The first is that<br />

all unemployment is basically frictional—that is, due to the fact that when people<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e unemployed, some time is required before they can find another vacant<br />

and suitable job. Given a steady flow <strong>of</strong> people into unemployment, F (measured<br />

say, as people per month), then if the average time it takes for an unemployed to<br />

find a job is T months, the average amount <strong>of</strong> unemployment, say U, will amount<br />

to T-months flow, U = FT. By expressing U and F as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the labor<br />

force, this can be rewritten as u = fT.<br />

The second hypothesis is that T depends on the existing vacancies rate, v. If<br />

there are but few, it will take a long search to find one. We may thus hypothesize<br />

that T is roughly inversely proportional to v, say T = c/v where c is some<br />

constant. But that implies u = fc/v or uv = fc, which is a standard way <strong>of</strong> formulating<br />

the Beveridge curve.<br />

Figure 8.2 shows a hypothetical Beveridge curve for a given country and point<br />

<strong>of</strong> time. It is a “rectangular hyperbola” in the (U, V) space and its position depends<br />

on the two parameters f and c that characterize that economy. If, and only if, these<br />

parameters change in time, the curve will shift. The actual value <strong>of</strong> U and V at

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!