11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recent Declines in the <strong>Saving</strong>s Rate 139<br />

12 different OECD countries for the period 1969 to 1986. His variables are the<br />

same or analogous to ours, except for not allowing for the possibility <strong>of</strong> consumption<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the inflation correction, and for the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a time trend<br />

which unfortunately turns out to be high (and negative) for a number <strong>of</strong> countries.<br />

This is disturbing, for a trend is a non-explanation.<br />

In<strong>com</strong>e growth is highly significant, generally the most significant (except possibly<br />

for trend), with but one exception, though the coefficient is typically smaller<br />

than in table 4.1 (range 1.5 to 0.5). The estimated effects <strong>of</strong> government surplus<br />

are consistent in the two studies and therefore reject pure Barro in favor <strong>of</strong> a<br />

partial Barro effect. 3 The interest rate was included for the eight larger countries.<br />

For the four countries with the highest t-ratios, 2 have positive and 2 negative<br />

coefficients. For the remaining countries, 3 are positive and one negative, but<br />

none are significant. On the whole, these results do not make a strong case for a<br />

clear positive effect.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> inflation, his estimated effect on saving is prevailingly positive<br />

(in 9 cases out <strong>of</strong> 12), and the coefficients are pretty stable across countries<br />

(around 0.3). This is contrary to our results, which however are not reliable<br />

enough to <strong>of</strong>fer a challenge to the time series estimates.<br />

Notes<br />

1. See Leff, Nathaniel H.: “Dependency Rates and <strong>Saving</strong>s Rates”, American Economic Review, Vol.<br />

LIX, 1969, pp. 886–96.<br />

2. See Ram R, “Dependency Rates and <strong>Aggregate</strong> <strong>Saving</strong>s: A New International Cross-Section<br />

Study”, American Economic Review, n. 72, 1982, pp. 537–44.<br />

3. There is only one country for which the deficit effect is estimated to be quite large—Italy, with a<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> -0.67 (t-ratio = 4). But in a detailed study <strong>of</strong> that country (Modigliani [13]) I found<br />

that the effect was quite small, no more than -0.19.<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. Aghevli, B., Boughton, James M., Montiel, Peter J., Villanueva, Delano, and Woglom, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey,<br />

“The Role <strong>of</strong> National <strong>Saving</strong> in the World Economy,” Washington (DC), International Monetary<br />

Fund, Occasional Paper, no. 67, 1990.<br />

2. Altonji, J., Hayashi, F., and Kotlik<strong>of</strong>f L., “Is the Extended Family Altruistically Linked?”, NBER,<br />

Working Paper, no. 3046, 1989.<br />

3. Ando, A. and Modigliani, F., “The <strong>Life</strong> Cycle <strong>Hypothesis</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Saving</strong>—<strong>Aggregate</strong> Implications <strong>of</strong><br />

Tests”, American Economic Review, vol. 1, no. 53, 1963.<br />

4. Barro, R.J., “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?”, Journal <strong>of</strong> Political Economy, no. 82, November–December<br />

1974.<br />

5. Bosworth, B., The Global Decline in <strong>Saving</strong>: Some International Comparisons, Washington (DC),<br />

Brookings Institution, 1990.<br />

6. Fisher, Irving, The Theory <strong>of</strong> Interest, New York, Macmillan, 1930.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!