11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emerging Issues on the World Economy 325<br />

<strong>of</strong> exports. How much in excess depends on elasticity, on the response to the<br />

demand for investing, the U.S. elasticity differential, and the level <strong>of</strong> the elasticity<br />

<strong>of</strong> domestic investment with respect to interest rates. We simple import a lot<br />

more than we export, because there is no way the poor manufacturers could do<br />

otherwise—the exchange rate moved against them and they could no longer sell.<br />

They had to import the capital. The exchange rate had to move against them.<br />

By the way, it was reinforced by the regulation that it has a tremendously high<br />

exchange rate against the dollar, in part because <strong>of</strong> the U.S. deficit. As the dollar<br />

has returned pretty much to normal levels, our tremendous deficit has disappeared.<br />

In fact during one quarter last year the balance <strong>of</strong> trade showed surplus,<br />

but this did not last. We still had a deficit, and not negligible, about $20 billion.<br />

From $160 billion it came down to $20 billion.<br />

Of course, in my view the exchange rate is still too high. Why is it too high?<br />

Because the deficit remains too high. If we take on less deficit in order to be able<br />

to reverse the process with smaller deficit, we must lower interest rates, in which<br />

case we will be pushing out capital instead <strong>of</strong> attracting it. This phenomenon does<br />

not imply that there is anything inferior or incapable or less vigorous. So from<br />

this point <strong>of</strong> view the situation has now changed. There is nothing new in our<br />

savings over the last few years. The reason Japan saved more is simply that saving<br />

essentially depends on growth. The more you grow the more you save—with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> Singapore. No matter how fast you grow, you save 40 percent. But<br />

everywhere else this law applies. There is plenty <strong>of</strong> evidence by which Japan’s<br />

high saving rates are largely explained.<br />

Investment has declined appreciably. The net investment has about halved,<br />

which presumably has something to do with growth. The question <strong>of</strong> the extent<br />

to which investment affects growth is delicate. I have done work recently and am<br />

convinced that there is evidence that growth does depend on investment. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> Japan the very high savings rate helps. In my theory, the relation between<br />

growth and saving has nothing to do with individual decisions. It is not the case<br />

that when there is rapid growth people decide to invest and to save more. It is,<br />

instead, a mechanical effect. The faster you grow, the more you save. This has<br />

nothing to do with upbringing or any such feature. In the case <strong>of</strong> Japan, one<br />

important feature is that <strong>of</strong> bequest.<br />

There was one further topic I planned to discuss, an aspect <strong>of</strong> what might<br />

happen in the financial market—the whole question <strong>of</strong> globalization. But in deference<br />

to punctuality I will close now.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!