11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Keynesian Gospel According to Modigliani 341<br />

M<br />

MM<br />

M s<br />

a<br />

Figure 15.3<br />

Classical Money demand (fixed Price level)<br />

X“ X* X‘ X<br />

It is evident from (15.4) that, assuming for the moment that k is a constant,<br />

(in line with the classical model), at a given time the quantity demanded depends<br />

only on the level <strong>of</strong> Real In<strong>com</strong>e, X. The demand function is reported in figure<br />

15.3 as the straight line MM with slope <strong>of</strong> kP 0 . On the vertical axis we have<br />

marked with X¯ the output corresponding to full employment <strong>of</strong> the labor force.<br />

The money supply can again be considered as exogenous, and therefore in figure<br />

15.3 is represented as an horizontal line at the height M s . The equilibrium <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Money market is given by the condition that the demand for money equal the<br />

supply, or zero excess demand<br />

s<br />

KP X - M = 0<br />

0<br />

But since KP 0 , and M s are exogenously given at any point <strong>of</strong> time, it is apparent<br />

that the only variable that affects the excess demand is output X. Thus the<br />

money market is cleared not by the classical price level, but by output. The market<br />

clearing output is given by<br />

X * s<br />

M P V<br />

= ( )<br />

0<br />

(15.5)<br />

Graphically the money market reaches a Keynesian equilibrium at a point (a)<br />

where the demand for money equals the supply or existing stock. In the graph<br />

the equilibrium in<strong>com</strong>e, X* is below the full employment in<strong>com</strong>e, X≤; nevertheless<br />

(a) represents an equilibrium because, in the money market, the demand for<br />

and the supply <strong>of</strong> money are equal, while in the labor market there is unemployment<br />

or excess supply, but because <strong>of</strong> wage rigidity, the wage and hence P<br />

is stationary. Thus X* can be characterized as a Keynesian under-employment<br />

equilibrium.<br />

But to establish that X* is indeed an “equilibrium,” stable, and unique it is<br />

not enough to show that, at that level <strong>of</strong> output, the demand and supply <strong>of</strong> money

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!