11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recent Declines in the <strong>Saving</strong>s Rate 117<br />

S = YL+ rW - C = ( 1-a) Y+ ( d -ar)<br />

W<br />

or:<br />

s = ( 1-a)-( d -ar)<br />

w<br />

(4.2)<br />

where: s = S/Y and w = W/Y.<br />

But with steady growth s = gw, implying:<br />

( 1- a)-( d -arw ) = gw<br />

or:<br />

w = ( 1-a) ( g+ d -ar)<br />

s = g( 1-a) ( g+ d -ar)<br />

(4.3)<br />

(4.3a)<br />

(4.3b)<br />

It is apparent from (4.3a) that the wealth-in<strong>com</strong>e ratio will tend to decline with<br />

g while the saving ratio will be an increasing function <strong>of</strong> g for any finite value<br />

<strong>of</strong> g, at least as long as the parameters a and d are not very sensitive to g, which<br />

is consistent with simulation reported in Modigliani and Brumberg [15].<br />

A <strong>com</strong>parison <strong>of</strong> equations (4.2) and (4.3b) shows that there are two alternative<br />

ways to express the saving ratio, s; first, in terms <strong>of</strong> wealth-in<strong>com</strong>e ratio (as<br />

in (4.2)), and second in terms <strong>of</strong> the growth rate, g, as in (4.3b). The formulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> equation (4.2) has some advantages in that it may be expected to hold reasonably<br />

well even in the short run. The drawback is the very limited availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> data on wealth, whereas g is available as long as there exist national in<strong>com</strong>e<br />

accounts. For this reason in our test we have used a linear approximation to equation<br />

(4.3b).<br />

1.3.2 Other Factors Affecting the <strong>Saving</strong> Rate<br />

Besides depending on growth, s will also be affected by any factor which affects<br />

the wealth-in<strong>com</strong>e ratio. Equation (3) suggests that one such factor is the interest<br />

rate, and that a rise in r will then raise w and s. However the second inference<br />

is not warranted because the parameters a and especially d are generally<br />

themselves a function <strong>of</strong> r. Results presented in Modigliani and Brumberg [15]<br />

suggest that d rises with r and may rise even faster, in which case s and w will<br />

decline with r.<br />

Other factors at work include, in addition to length <strong>of</strong> retirement, the timing<br />

and size <strong>of</strong> other major expenditures for which provisions must be made, such as<br />

for the purchase <strong>of</strong> a house, children’s education, or other major durables. The<br />

need for accumulation will be increased in the presence <strong>of</strong> credit rationing.<br />

Another reason for the accumulation <strong>of</strong> assets is the precautionary motive<br />

(Keynes [10], p. 107) which in turn interacts with the availability <strong>of</strong> public and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!