11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 The <strong>Life</strong>-Cycle <strong>Hypothesis</strong><br />

which can be expressed entirely in terms <strong>of</strong> y by making use <strong>of</strong> equation (II.10¢). The above expression<br />

must fall as in<strong>com</strong>e rises, as stated in the text, since its derivative with respect to y is proportional<br />

to -[E(1 - b) + b(1 - v)], which is necessarily negative (provided E > 0, which is assumed).<br />

In fact, we can establish that<br />

e ><br />

E{ [ a- a( y , t)<br />

] y}= <<br />

0<br />

<<br />

as y= y<br />

È l -1<br />

1-<br />

˘<br />

,<br />

><br />

ÎÍ l[ E( 1- b+ b( 1-v)<br />

)]<br />

˚˙<br />

which shows explicitly the level <strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e at which the average gap between a and a(y e ,t) is zero.<br />

40. We have seen that a high elasticity <strong>of</strong> expectations tends to pull ȳ e (y) closer to the 45-degree<br />

line; at the same time, however, it will tend to flatten the p¯ (y) curve relative to the ȳ e (y) curve, for,<br />

if assets are approximately adjusted to y e -1, then the larger the gap between y e and y -1 , the larger will<br />

tend to be the unbalance in assets. Since, however, the second effect does not quite <strong>of</strong>fset the first<br />

(see the discussion <strong>of</strong> section II.2, especially page 20), a high value <strong>of</strong> E will on the whole, increase<br />

the slope and reduce the intercept <strong>of</strong> p¯ (y) and thus <strong>of</strong> c¯(y).<br />

41. They may, in fact, have an average consumption level below the over-all average for two reasons:<br />

(a) because it seems likely that the level <strong>of</strong> consumption planned for after retirement will, on the<br />

whole, tend to be smaller than the average level during the earning span; (b) because <strong>of</strong> the secular<br />

rise in in<strong>com</strong>e per capita which characterizes most <strong>of</strong> the economies for which we have budget data.<br />

See, on this point, Modigliani and Brumberg, op. cit.<br />

42. Our statements about retired households find strong support in the data on the size distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e by age, reported by Janet A. Fisher, in “In<strong>com</strong>e, Spending, and <strong>Saving</strong> Patterns <strong>of</strong> Consumer<br />

Units in Different Age Groups,” Studies in In<strong>com</strong>e and Wealth, Vol. XV, especially tables 1<br />

and 2, pp. 81 and 82. Actually, these tables are likely to overestimate the in<strong>com</strong>e (used in our sense)<br />

<strong>of</strong> elderly people, since in<strong>com</strong>e, there, is defined to include such items as pensions and retirement<br />

pay (p. 81, note 6). These inclusions also reduce the usefulness <strong>of</strong> the information on saving and dissaving<br />

by age groups presented in table 11 (p. 93). Even with the upward-biased definition <strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e,<br />

the proportion <strong>of</strong> positive savers is smaller in the age group 65 and over than in any other group<br />

except the group 18 to 24. For this latter group, <strong>of</strong> course, the figures are seriously affected by the<br />

inclusion <strong>of</strong> durable goods purchases in consumption. Presumably, had our definitions <strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e and<br />

saving been adopted, the relative scarcity <strong>of</strong> savers and predominance <strong>of</strong> dissavers in the elderly group<br />

would be much more pronounced.<br />

43. These results were first reported in a brief <strong>com</strong>munication presented at the Conference on <strong>Saving</strong>,<br />

Inflation and Economic Progress, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota, in May, 1952. The authors have also had<br />

the opportunity to consult a preliminary draft on “The Relation <strong>of</strong> the Within-Group Permanent Component<br />

<strong>of</strong> In<strong>com</strong>e to the In<strong>com</strong>e Elasticity <strong>of</strong> Expenditures,” and have had the benefit <strong>of</strong> extensive<br />

discussion and consultations with Miss Reid. The hypothesis tested in the above-mentioned paper had<br />

already been partly anticipated in Reid’s earlier contribution, “Effect <strong>of</strong> In<strong>com</strong>e Concept upon Expenditure<br />

Curves <strong>of</strong> Farm Families,” Studies in In<strong>com</strong>e and Wealth, Vol. XV, especially pp. 133–139.<br />

44. If the equalities are replaced by proportionality, the correlation r yy-1 remains unity. Furthermore,<br />

replacing in (II.1) y e by k i y, and a by<br />

( t-1)<br />

M e<br />

( t -1)<br />

Mvk2<br />

vy-1<br />

=<br />

y,<br />

L<br />

L<br />

(since by assumption, up to the beginning <strong>of</strong> the current year the assets <strong>of</strong> every household are proportional<br />

to the stationary equilibrium value, n being the proportionality factor and having the same<br />

meaning as in note 41), we obtain<br />

L+ L( N-t) k1+ M( t-1)<br />

vk2<br />

c =<br />

y,<br />

LL<br />

t<br />

so that, for any given age t, the consumption-in<strong>com</strong>e relation is still a straight line through the origin<br />

and therefore h cy is still unity. Since, however, the slope varies with age, if we fail to stratify by age,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!