11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function 11<br />

hood there<strong>of</strong>) we must seek what implications can be deduced as to the relations<br />

between these variables.<br />

If the marginal propensity to consume is defined literally as the increment in<br />

the current consumption <strong>of</strong> the household ac<strong>com</strong>panying an increment in its<br />

current in<strong>com</strong>e, divided by the increment in in<strong>com</strong>e, keeping other things constant,<br />

then, according to equation (II.1), this quantity would be<br />

∂ c<br />

= 1 ,<br />

∂ y L t<br />

which is independent <strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e but dependent on age. The consumption function<br />

(II.1) would be represented by a straight line with the above slope and an<br />

intercept<br />

e<br />

( N - t) y + a ;<br />

L<br />

t<br />

and, since this intercept can be assumed positive, 17 the proportion <strong>of</strong> in<strong>com</strong>e saved<br />

should tend to rise with in<strong>com</strong>e.<br />

In order to get some feeling as to the quantitative implications <strong>of</strong> our results,<br />

let us say that the earning span, N, is <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 40 years, the retirement span,<br />

M, 10 years, and therefore the total active life span, L, <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 50 years.<br />

These figures are not supposed to be anything more than a very rough guess and<br />

their only purpose is to give us some notion <strong>of</strong> the magnitudes involved. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> these figures, the marginal propensity to consume would lie somewhere<br />

between a minimum <strong>of</strong> 1/50, or 2 percent, and a maximum <strong>of</strong> 1/11, or 9 percent,<br />

depending on age.<br />

These figures seem unreasonably small. This is because the above definition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the marginal propensity to consume is clearly not a very reasonable one. A<br />

change in the current in<strong>com</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the household will generally tend to be ac<strong>com</strong>panied<br />

by a change in its expected in<strong>com</strong>e, y e , so that there is little sense in including<br />

y e among the things that are supposed to be constant as y changes. Note,<br />

however, that the same objection does not apply to a, for a denotes initial assets<br />

and, for a given household, assets at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the current period necessarily<br />

represent a constant.<br />

Once we recognize that y e is generally a function <strong>of</strong> y, the marginal propensity<br />

to consume at age t may be defined as<br />

dc<br />

dy<br />

e<br />

1 N - t dy<br />

= + .<br />

L L dy<br />

t<br />

t<br />

(II.3)<br />

Since

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!