11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

340 Miscellanea<br />

Table 15.2 (continued)<br />

(percentage <strong>of</strong> civilian labor force)<br />

A P FIN S UK EUR-II( 1 ) EUR-12( 2 ) EU-15( 3 ) US JP<br />

1982 3.5 7.2 5.4 3.3 10.3 8.6 8.5 8.7 9.7 2.4<br />

1983 4.1 8.2 5.5 3.7 11.1 8.9 8.9 9.1 9.6 2.6<br />

1984 3.8 8.9 5.2 3.3 11.1 9.8 9.7 9.7 7.5 2.7<br />

1985 3.6 9.2 5.0 2.9 11.5 10.1 10.0 10.0 7.2 2.6<br />

1986 3.1 8.8 5.2 2.7 11.5 10.0 9.9 9.9 7.0 2.8<br />

1987 3.8 7.3 4.8 2.2 10.6 10.0 9.9 9.7 6.2 2.8<br />

1988 3.6 5.9 4.2 1.8 8.7 9.6 9.6 9.1 5.5 2.5<br />

1989 3.1 5.2 3.1 1.6 7.3 8.9 8.8 8.3 5.3 2.3<br />

1990 3.2 4.8 3.2 1.7 7.0 8.2 8.1 7.7 5.6 2.1<br />

1981–90 3.4 7.3 4.7 2.6 9.8 9.1 9.0 5.0 7.1 2.5<br />

1991 3.4 4.2 6.6 3.1 8.8 8.1 8.1 8.1 6.8 2.1<br />

1991 3.4 4.2 6.6 3.1 8.8 8.2 8.2 8.2 6.8 2.1<br />

1992 3.4 4.3 11.7 5.6 10.0 9.2 9.1 9.2 7.5 2.2<br />

1993 4.0 5.7 16.3 19.1 10.5 10.8 10.8 10.7 6.9 2.5<br />

1994 3.8 6.9 16.6 9.4 9.6 11.6 11.5 11.1 6.1 2.9<br />

1995 3.9 7.3 15.4 8.8 8.7 11.3 11.2 10.7 5.6 3.1<br />

1996 4.3 7.3 14.6 9.6 8.2 11.5 11.5 10.8 5.4 3.4<br />

1997 4.4 6.8 12.7 9.9 7.0 11.5 11.5 10.6 4.9 3.4<br />

1998 4.5 5.2 11.4 8.3 6.3 10.9 10.9 9.9 4.5 4.1<br />

1999 4.0 4.5 10.2 7.2 6.1 9.9 10.0 9.2 4.2 4.7<br />

2000 3.7 4.2 9.8 5.9 5.6 9.0 9.1 8.3 4.0 4.7<br />

1991–2000 3.9 5.6 12.5 7.7 8.1 10.4 10.4 9.9 5.6 3.3<br />

2001 3.4 4.6 9.1 5.2 5.3 8.4 8.5 7.7 4.6 4.7<br />

2002 3.2 5.1 8.4 5.0 5.1 7.8 7.9 2.2 4.7 4.8<br />

( 1 ) EU-15 excluding DK, EL, S, UK; 1960–91: including D_90.<br />

( 2 ) EU-15 excluding DK, S, UK; 1960–91: including D_90.<br />

( 3 ) 1960–91: including D_90.<br />

labor cost” i.e., to the e wage (adjusted for productivity trend). Thus we take the<br />

mark up, at any point <strong>of</strong> time, as fixed—i.e., independent <strong>of</strong> output, (though it<br />

will tend to increase in time). This approximation implies that, if at any time the<br />

wage is fixed at Wo, the price itself is fixed as some corresponding multiple P 0 .<br />

We find it convenient to rely on this approximation which does not materially<br />

affect the substance <strong>of</strong> the argument, but greatly simplifies the exposition, for<br />

when <strong>com</strong>bined with the assumption <strong>of</strong> a fixed wage Wo, it enables us to treat<br />

price P in equation (15.3) as a constant, P 0 . The demand for money then be<strong>com</strong>es<br />

M<br />

d<br />

= kP X<br />

0<br />

(15.4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!