11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Risk-Adjusted Performance 293<br />

suggests an alternative, slightly simpler measure <strong>of</strong> risk-adjusted performance,<br />

based exclusively on excess returns:<br />

RAPA()= i e()= i ( s s ) e<br />

M i i<br />

(12.7)<br />

RAP and RAPA are essentially interchangeable in that they rank portfolios<br />

identically, but the reference value for RAPA is the excess return <strong>of</strong> the market,<br />

e M , frequently referred to as the equity risk premium.<br />

Sigma as a Measure <strong>of</strong> Risk<br />

Our analysis relies on the fact that the market as a whole is willing to pay a<br />

price—give up expected returns—to avoid variability. A portfolio consisting only<br />

<strong>of</strong> short-term riskless assets faces no dispersion in returns—it bears essentially<br />

no risk. If one is prepared to bear risk—say, for instance, the risk associated with<br />

holding the market—one can increase the expected return by the market mean<br />

excess return, which on average has been substantial. This excess return is the<br />

premium one can earn for bearing the market risk. Its existence <strong>of</strong>fers anyone the<br />

opportunity to trade <strong>of</strong>f an increment <strong>of</strong> excess returns for an equal percentage<br />

increment <strong>of</strong> sigma.<br />

The observation that the market rewards greater uncertainty with higher<br />

expected returns implies that, on average, investors are risk-averse. That is,<br />

investors tend to behave as though incremental gains are less and less valuable<br />

(or produce decreasing incremental satisfation). If this is the case, then an investment<br />

returning $10,000 with certainty—i.e., without dispersion—is preferable to<br />

one that has the same expected value but is dispersed, such as an investment that<br />

is equally likely to return $5,000 or $15,000. It takes more than the prospect <strong>of</strong><br />

an extra $5,000 to <strong>of</strong>fset the equal probability <strong>of</strong> falling $5,000 short. More generally,<br />

dispersion has to be <strong>com</strong>pensated by higher expected return because upside<br />

dispersion is ac<strong>com</strong>panied by more costly downside risk.<br />

For this reason, the view that dispersion is a valid measure <strong>of</strong> risk is consistent<br />

with the assertion that what really matters to investors is “downside risk.”<br />

While here we have employed the traditional notion <strong>of</strong> sigma as a measure <strong>of</strong><br />

risk, in fact, the RAP methodology is applicable to many alternative definitions<br />

<strong>of</strong> risk including several measures <strong>of</strong> downside risk.<br />

RAP as a Tool for Optimal Portfolio Selection<br />

We have said that any portfolio with dispersion s i can be transformed into another<br />

portfolio with different risk, say, s p , by levering it through a choice <strong>of</strong> d = s p /s i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!