11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Keynesian Gospel According to Modigliani 331<br />

kPX<br />

= M s<br />

(15.2)<br />

In what follows, we will refer to the “monetary mechanism” as the mechanism<br />

that insures the clearing <strong>of</strong> the money market, i.e. that equation (15.2) is<br />

satisfied.<br />

We will show that the mechanism proposed by the classics is unacceptable for<br />

it relies on the counterfactual assumption that wages are highly flexible downward,<br />

i.e. that they decline promptly in the presence <strong>of</strong> excess supply <strong>of</strong> labor or<br />

(non-frictional) unemployment. Keynes instead elaborates a mechanism that is<br />

valid regardless <strong>of</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> rigidity <strong>of</strong> wages. It is the formulation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

mechanism that constitutes his crowning achievement.<br />

II The Classical Monetary Theory<br />

II.1 The Determinants <strong>of</strong> the Price Level and the Quantity Theory <strong>of</strong><br />

Money<br />

The essence <strong>of</strong> the classical monetary theory is very simple: money and the<br />

money market has one single role to play: to determine the price level, while<br />

having no effect on any other real variable. It rests entirely on the (counterfactual)<br />

Postulate <strong>of</strong> wage-price flexibility: in the presence <strong>of</strong> excess supply,<br />

wages-prices decline promptly toward the equilibrium level reducing the excess<br />

supply until it has disappeared. Since this assumption insures that every market<br />

(including the labor market) always clears, aggregate output X, must be fixed,<br />

pegged at the “full employment output,” say X¯ , which at any time can be taken<br />

as a given. If one substitutes X¯ for X in (15.2), one obtains the classical demand<br />

equation<br />

M d = kX<br />

P<br />

Since at any point <strong>of</strong> time, X¯ and k are given “real” variables, independent <strong>of</strong><br />

M, reflecting the size <strong>of</strong> population, the state <strong>of</strong> the arts (productivity), payment<br />

habits <strong>of</strong> M, they can be taken as constant, so that the demand for money turns<br />

out to depend on a single variable P, and to be proportional to it. This demand<br />

equation is shown in figure 15.2, as MM. It is a straight line through the origin<br />

<strong>of</strong> slope kX¯ . The supply can again be taken as exogenous, M s , and represented<br />

by the horizontal line at that height. Equilibrium P, P¯ is found at the intersection<br />

<strong>of</strong> demand and supply. Its value is given by the solution for P <strong>of</strong> the equilibrium<br />

condition M d = kX¯ P = M s or<br />

s<br />

s<br />

P = M kX = M V X<br />

(15.3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!