11.11.2014 Views

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

"Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate ... - Arabictrader.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function 5<br />

U = U( c , c ,... c , a ).<br />

t t+ 1 L L+<br />

1<br />

(1.1)<br />

This function is to be maximized subject to the budget constraint, which, if the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> interest, r, is not expected to change appreciably over the balance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

life span, can be expressed by means <strong>of</strong> the equation<br />

a<br />

t<br />

N<br />

L<br />

yt<br />

aL+<br />

1<br />

ct<br />

+ Â = +<br />

t +- 1 t Â<br />

t = t ( 1+<br />

r)<br />

( 1+<br />

r)<br />

t = t ( 1+<br />

r)<br />

. 6<br />

L+- 1 t t +- 1 t<br />

(1.2)<br />

For the utility function (1.1) to be maximized, the quantities c t and a L+1 must<br />

be such as to satisfy the first order conditions:<br />

Ï ∂ U l<br />

Ô<br />

=<br />

t<br />

∂ ct<br />

Ô ( 1+<br />

r)<br />

Ì<br />

Ô ∂ U l<br />

Ô =<br />

Ó∂<br />

aL+<br />

1 ( 1+<br />

r)<br />

+- 1 t<br />

L+-<br />

1 t<br />

; t = tt , + 1,...,<br />

L<br />

(1.3)<br />

where l represents a Lagrange multiplier. The equation (1.3), together with (1.2),<br />

yields a system <strong>of</strong> L - t + 3 simultaneous equations to determine L - t + 1 c¯t’s,<br />

ā L+1 and l¯ , the barred symbols being used to characterize the maximizing value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the corresponding variable.<br />

If current in<strong>com</strong>e, y t + ra t , is unequal to c t , the individual will be currently<br />

saving (or dissaving); and similarly, if y t + ra t is not equal to c¯t, the individual<br />

will be planning to save (or dissave) at age t. The traditional model suggests that<br />

we may usefully distinguish two separate reasons for such inequalities to arise.<br />

We refer to these reasons as the “motives for saving.” 7<br />

I The first <strong>of</strong> these motives is the desire to add to the estate for the benefit <strong>of</strong><br />

one’s heirs; it arises when ā L+1 is greater than a t . Under this condition y t + ra t<br />

must exceed c¯t for at least some t t.<br />

II The second motive arises out <strong>of</strong> the fact that the pattern <strong>of</strong> current and prospective<br />

in<strong>com</strong>e receipts will generally not coincide with the preferred consumption,<br />

c¯t, for all t t. This clearly represents an independent motive in that it can<br />

account for positive (or negative) saving in any subinterval <strong>of</strong> the life span, even<br />

in the absence <strong>of</strong> the first motive.<br />

It is precisely on this point that a really important lesson can be learned by<br />

taking a fresh look at the traditional theory <strong>of</strong> the household; according to this<br />

theory there need not be any close and simple relation between consumption in<br />

a given short period and in<strong>com</strong>e in the same period. The rate <strong>of</strong> consumption in<br />

any given period is a facet <strong>of</strong> a plan which extends over the balance <strong>of</strong> the individual’s<br />

life, while the in<strong>com</strong>e accruing within the same period is but one element

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!