09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.P.D.M. V.2.3<br />

(Al/2001)<br />

3.9.3.29 A distance of at least 1000 mm from the traffic face of safety fence or 600 mm from the<br />

back of post whichever is greater should be provided for any corrugated beam barrier fences<br />

erected adjacent to the edge of a downhill slope or a retaining wall to allow the dynamic<br />

deflection of the fences during the impact. It is stressed that if kerbs are present, it is<br />

desirable to set the barrier face in the same line as the kerbline. Otherwise, additional<br />

dynamic deflection should be allowed.<br />

3.9.3.30 For an uphill slope, the height and slope angle are the factors determining whether barrier<br />

should be provided in front of the slope. In the comparison of the severity of vehicular<br />

impacts with slope to that with safety fences, Roadside Design Guide suggested that safety<br />

fences should be provided for less severity when the slope angle is greater than 20° and the<br />

slope height is greater than 3 m.<br />

3.9.3.31 If no barrier fence is provided in front of an uphill slope, attention should be given to ensure<br />

that the slope surface within a height of 1000 mm from the adjacent pavement should be<br />

smooth.<br />

3.9.3.32 Dynamic deflection varies according to the impact speed, impact angle and the<br />

characteristics of the barrier fences. For an impact angle between 20° and 25°, Table 3.9.3.1<br />

gives the minimum distance to the hazard.<br />

Table 3.9.3.1<br />

Dynamic Deflection for Various Barrier Types and Speeds<br />

Barrier type/Speed<br />

Distance between back of post and obstacle<br />

80km/h<br />

90km/h<br />

lOOkm/h<br />

HOkm/h<br />

W-beam barrier with posts<br />

spaced at 2 m centres<br />

1.2m<br />

1.3m<br />

1.4m<br />

1.6m<br />

Standard/Modified<br />

Thriebeam barrier with<br />

posts spaced at 2 m centres<br />

0.5m<br />

0.7m<br />

0.9m<br />

l.lm<br />

3.9.3.33 The effective safety fences should be extended far enough upstream and downstream to<br />

prevent errant vehicles from hitting the hazardous object.<br />

3.9.3.34 The safety fence may be flared so that they are installed away from the kerbline as it<br />

approaches its terminal. The flaring of safety fence has several purposes as follows:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

The total length of safety fences can be reduced.<br />

The safety fences can be located further away from the travel lanes.<br />

3.9.3.35 The disadvantage of flared fences is that the greater the flare rate, the higher the angle at<br />

which an errant vehicle can hit. Also, greater flare rate will increase the possibility of an<br />

impacting vehicle being redirected back into or across the carriageway following an impact.<br />

This situation is especially undesirable on two way carriageway where the impact vehicle<br />

could be redirected into on-coming traffic.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!