09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.P.D.M.V.2.4<br />

of the two values is the minimum acceptable length of weaving<br />

section (Lmin).<br />

4.6*10.5 The actual weaving length, particularly in connection with a<br />

weaving section between rather than within interchanges, will<br />

often be greater than the minimum weaving length* The width of<br />

weaving section is hence defined as a function of both the<br />

minimum and actual weaving lengths together with the predicted<br />

and design flows. The number of lanes required in the weaving<br />

section (N) is given by the equation<br />

U - Qnw * Qwt ^ ( 2 x Lpin + ^ Qw2<br />

D Lact D<br />

where Qnw = total non weaving flow (adjusted) v.p.h*<br />

Qw1 s major weaving flow (adjusted) v.p.h.<br />

Qw2 s minor weaving flow (adjusted) v.p.h.<br />

D s design flow per lane in v.p.h* as described in<br />

para. 4.6.10*4<br />

Lmin = minimum weaving length (m)<br />

Lact * actual weaving length (m)<br />

4.6.10.6 The number of lanes within the weaving section as calculated<br />

above will invariably involve a fraction and a decision must be<br />

taken on whether to round up or down. In some cases it may be<br />

possible to vary the actual weaving length in order to bring N<br />

nearer to a whole number and hence simplify the decision* Wiere<br />

the available weaving length is fixed by outside constraints, as<br />

is normally the case, the decision to round up or down becomes<br />

more difficult. Obviously if the fractional part is small with<br />

relatively low weaving volumes and a low design flow, it is not<br />

unreasonable to round down. If the opposite is true, N would be<br />

rounded up. Between these two extremes it is necessary to<br />

exercise judgement taking account of such factors as cost and<br />

availability of lane for an extra lane.<br />

4*6*10.7 It is also important to bear in mind that it is not sufficient<br />

merely to provide the proper number of lanes; the physical<br />

arrangement of the lanes within the weaving section must also be<br />

considered. Care must be taken that use of the lanes by weaving<br />

and non weaving traffic will be in proportion to their relative<br />

volumes so that parts of the roadway do not become underused<br />

while other parts become congested. The possibility of such an<br />

imbalance of flows occurring may well influence the decision on<br />

whether to round up or down, For example an outer lane added to<br />

a weaving section will generally aid only an outer non-weaving<br />

flow (particularly where 3 or more lanes are already proposed}*<br />

This is likely to be of little use if most of the traffic is<br />

weaving and the relevant outer non-weaving flow is small.<br />

4.6*10.8 Finally it is necessary to ensure that the number of lanes in<br />

the weaving section satisfies the requirements of the merging<br />

and diverging sections of the inter change (s) as discussed<br />

earlier.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!