09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.P.D.M.V.2.4<br />

(A1/92)<br />

(i)<br />

Where the combined, Heavy Goods Vehicle, Medium Goods<br />

Vehicle, Bus and Coach traffic flow is predicted to<br />

be less than 5$ of the design year AADT flow, subject<br />

to paragraphs 4*6.7*8, 4.6.7.9 and 4.6.7.11* the<br />

effective carriageway width may be reduced to 4.3m;<br />

or<br />

Cii) Where the combined, Heavy Goods Vehicle, Medium Goods<br />

Vehicle, Bus and coach traffic flow is predicted to<br />

be greater than 10J{ of the design year AADT flow,<br />

subject to paragraph 4.6.7.11, the effective<br />

carriageway width shall be increased to 6m, except<br />

that where very high costs may arise, the standard<br />

effective carriageway width of 5*2m may be provided.<br />

However it will be necessary in this case to<br />

substantiate the savings that would be obtained, and<br />

provide details of the indications of adopting 5.2m<br />

rather than 6m.<br />

4.6*7.8 It should be noted that the 5.2m width will allow a goods<br />

vehicle to pass a stationary car, but in the event of a goods<br />

vehicle or bus breaking down it is unlikely that another goods<br />

vehicle or bus would be able to pass the broken down vehicle.<br />

Similarly, whilst the JJ.3m width will allow a car to pass<br />

another stationary car, it is unlikely that a goods vehicle or<br />

bus could pass the same stationary car. Therefore when<br />

contemplating the use of an effective carriageway width less<br />

than 6m, consideration should be given as to whether on the<br />

particular single lane ramp or slip road there is for any reason<br />

likely to be a higher breakdown incidence than normal, the<br />

effects of which might be worsened if a too narrow width was<br />

adopted. Consideration must also be given to the availability<br />

of alternative routes which could be used to by-pass the<br />

obstruction. The Public Transport Planning Division of the<br />

Transport Department should be consulted to ascertain whether<br />

there is any likelihood of a bus route being required at any<br />

time in the future, which might be prejudiced if an inadequate<br />

operational width was provided.<br />

4.6.7.9 Where single lane ramps or slip roads are greater than 50m in<br />

length the effective carriageway width should not normally be<br />

less than 5»2m»<br />

4.6.7.10 Where single lane ramps or slip roads are greater than 100m in<br />

length the Traffic Control and Surveillance Division of the<br />

Transport Department should be consulted to ascertain whether<br />

surveillance measures need to be included in the scheme.<br />

4.6.7*11 To ensure adequate clearance between any vehicle and the<br />

parapets, and to maintain the passing requirements mentioned in<br />

paragraph 4.6.7.8 the effective carriageway widths should be<br />

widened on curves in accordance with Table 4.6*7.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!