09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.P.D.M.V.2.3<br />

(Al/2001)<br />

33.8 Climbing lanes for Single Carriageway Roads<br />

3.3.8.1 Gradients can cause severe congestion on single carriageways, where a slow moving goods<br />

vehicle will create long platoons of traffic if faster vehicles are unable to overtake. These<br />

platoons will frequently be unable to dissipate for a considerable distance, as overtaking is a<br />

difficult and hazardous manoeuvre on a 2 lane road.<br />

3.3.8.2 When improving an existing single carriageway road, such congested locations will be<br />

readily identified. Significant improvements in flow will be effected by the strategic<br />

provision of climbing lanes at frequent intervals on gradients to permit overtaking where it<br />

is most necessary. It is not suitable to provide gradient/traffic criteria for the provision of<br />

climbing lanes on single carriageways. Each site must be considered individually in relation<br />

to overtaking possibilities on the route as a whole, to arrive at the most suitable means of<br />

achieving improvements to traffic flow. In some cases, the provision of a climbing lane on a<br />

2-3% gradient may represent the most advantageous means of ensuring that steady progress<br />

can be made.<br />

As an interim measure, the construction of strategically located passing bays should be<br />

considered where it is likely that a full climbing lane could not be achieved for some period<br />

of time, and the length of the road in question is greater than 500m.<br />

3.3.8.3 For new single carriageway rural roads the provision of climbing lanes on hills offers the<br />

most economic and effective means of ensuring that there are frequent opportunities for<br />

overtaking and the strategic placing of climbing lanes will ensure steady progress. As with<br />

existing single carriageway roads, it is not possible to provide gradient/traffic criteria and<br />

each site must be considered on its merits in relation to overtaking opportunities on the route<br />

as a whole.<br />

3.3.8.4 The minimum carriageway width at climbing lanes should be 10m, divided into 3 lanes.<br />

The climbing lane should be 3.2m wide, the other two being 3.4m each. Appropriate double<br />

white line road markings should be in accordance with Volume 3.<br />

3.3.8.5 Generally, the full width of the climbing lane should be provided at a point "S", 100m uphill<br />

from the point where the sag curve attains a 2% gradient, as shown in Diagram 3.3.8.1. A<br />

taper of 1 in 30 to 1 in 40 should be provided over the 100m length as in Diagram 3.3.8.2<br />

3.3.8.6 The physical width of the climbing lane should generally be maintained to a point "F", 200m<br />

beyond the point where the crest curve reduces to 2% gradient, followed by a 100m taper.<br />

Cross hatching road markings and advance warning signs should be provided in advance of<br />

the taper, to channelise vehicles.(see Diagram 3.3.8.3).<br />

3.3.8.7 At short hills, it may be necessary to commence the climbing lane in advance of point S so<br />

as to provide a minimum length of at least 200m of full width climbing lane. For existing<br />

roads, where crest curves may be substantially sharper than the minimum prescribed, it may<br />

be necessary to adopt a shorter terminal detail so as to prevent the lane reduction extending<br />

too far beyond the crest.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!