09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T.P.D.M.V.2.4<br />

4.6.9 Diverging Lanes<br />

4*6.9.1 As with merging lanes (see para, 4,6.8.1) a main line operating<br />

speed of 80 km/h has been used in arriving at the recommended<br />

standards.<br />

4.6*9«2 The direct diverging lane, i.e. where the diverging lane exits<br />

via a straight taper, is to be preferred under normal site<br />

conditions. The diverge taper shall be 1:20 except that 1:35<br />

should be adopted, to give additional space for diverging<br />

traffic, at single lane links or at two lane links where one<br />

lane is dropped from a three lane main line.<br />

4.6.9.3 The length of diverge nose should be a minimum of 40m.<br />

4.6.9.4 More generous diverging layouts may be required under the<br />

following adverse site conditions :-<br />

(i) If the main line is on a significant right hand<br />

curve, a direct taper would result in a tangential<br />

alignment and would be confusing to drivers.<br />

(ii)<br />

(iii)<br />

If the main line is on a steep upgrade a longer<br />

distance is needed for the diverging manoeuvre, to<br />

enable faster vehicles approaching in the outer<br />

lanes to penetrate through those heavy vehicles<br />

which are moving slowly in the left hand lane.<br />

When the main line is on a steep downgrade a problem<br />

may arise associated with the high speed of vehicles<br />

on the main line left hand lane.<br />

In these situations an extra diverging lane 3*7m wide and at<br />

least 100m long with a 70m taper should be provided.<br />

4.6.9.5 To decide upon the most appropriate diverging lane layout to<br />

accommodate design year flows, a method is employed which is the<br />

same as that used for merging lanes. Igain it should be<br />

emphasised however that the method described in subsequent<br />

paragraphs indicates the most suitable layout for a diverge<br />

considered in isolation. The other junctions along the main<br />

line route should also be considered, so that drivers may be<br />

presented with a consistent set of layout features.<br />

4.6.9.6 The main line and link flows should be assessed in terms of<br />

v.p.h. in the design year and the worst combination of these<br />

flows, taking account of different peak periods, used as a base.<br />

The base flows should then be adjusted for non standard traffic<br />

composition and gradient as shown in Table 4.6.8.1, The<br />

gradient should be measured over a distance of one kilometre,<br />

centred upon the nose of the diverge lane.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!