09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T.P.D.M.V.2.3<br />

(Al/2001)<br />

33.9 CMmbiag Lanes for Dual Carriageway Roads<br />

3.3.9.1 An additional uphill lane should be provided on 2 lane dual carriageway roads if the forecast<br />

design year traffic flow exceeds the flow level indicated in Diagram 3.3.9.1 relative to the<br />

gradient of the hill The Gradient G = 100 H/L should be calculated in accordance with<br />

Diagram 3.3.9.1. An additional lane should be considered if the minimum gradient is 3%<br />

over a distance of 0.5 km.<br />

3.3.9.2 Where costs of providing the additional land for a climbing lane are high relative to the total<br />

cost of the works, consideration should be given to adjusting the alignment of the<br />

carriageway within the standard highway width and reducing or eliminating the<br />

verge/marginal strip widths so that a climbing lane can be provided without any additional<br />

land being required, as shown in Diagram 3.3.9.2.<br />

3.3.9.3 The appropriate full width of the climbing lane should be provided in similar manner to that<br />

for single carriageway, i.e. at a point !I S", 100m from the 2% point of the sag curve.<br />

However a taper of at least 1 in 45 should be provided in the case of climbing lanes for dual<br />

carriageways, as shown in Diagram 3.3.9.3<br />

3.3.9.4 At the end of the climbing lane section the extreme left hand lane should be continued, and<br />

any tapering down should affect the extreme right hand lane as shown in Diagram 3.3.9.4.<br />

3.3.9.5 Passing bays are not appropriate for dual carriageway roads.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!