09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T*P*D*M.V.2.4<br />

The average gradient through the section and 0.5 km upstream of the merge<br />

is 2% downhill and the predicted heavy vehicle content is 15*. From Table<br />

4*6.8*1 therefore no adjustment is required to the predicted flows.<br />

The total weaving flow is thus 1600 v.p.h.<br />

From Diagram 4,6.10.1 using line B-B (for 80 km design speed and 1400<br />

v.p.h. per lane design flow) the minimum weaving section length Lmin s<br />

240m (N.B. this is taken from the small graph inset which produces a<br />

larger figure than the main graph).<br />

Number of lanes required within weaving section ;«<br />

M - Qnw1 + Qnw2 + Qw1 r. Lmin . Qw2<br />

N . g + C2 x — + 1> —<br />

2200 + 600 + 900 ,*> 240 » 700<br />

* (2 -<br />

H s 3.3 lanes<br />

As the fractional part is small and the weaving flows are not relatively<br />

high it would be advisable in this situation to maintain the dual three<br />

character of the road and provide a three lanes wide weaving section. The<br />

full merging and diverging lane requirements as stated in sections 4.6*8<br />

and 4.6.9 would in any case be provided.<br />

Consider also the situation which is the same in all respect except that<br />

the actual weaving section length is only 600m.<br />

In these circumstances the number of lanes required in the weaving section<br />

would be 3.54. When one considers the lengths of merging and diverging<br />

•lanes required there would be less than 200m between the end of one and<br />

the beginning of the other* In this situation it would generally be more<br />

sensible to run the additional fourth lane throughout the whole section.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!