09.01.2015 Views

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

1 - HKU Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T.P.D.M.V.2.4<br />

4.2.7 Economic Considerations<br />

4.2.7.1 Ignoring decisions which are made for political expediency, the type and scale of junction<br />

provided is ultimately governed by economic considerations. The cost of provision of a<br />

junction in terms of construction costs and land costs etc. can be weighed against the<br />

monetary benefits which accrue from reduced delay and savings in accidents etc. and the<br />

scheme producing the best value of money is the most appropriate scheme.<br />

4.2.7.2 Priority junctions are generally the cheapest in terms of construction cost and are therefore<br />

the most viable at low flows where delays and accident rates are low. At the top end of the<br />

flow range where substantial widening and channelization are required, the additional land<br />

take may prove uneconomical when compared to a more compact traffic signal design.<br />

4.2.7.3 Traffic signals can be relatively economical in the use of land which will normally more<br />

than offset the cost of equipment. High capacity can be achieved through multi lane<br />

approaches, developed over a relatively short distance, thereby minimising the junction area.<br />

4.2.7.4 Conventional roundabouts are always more extravagant in their use of land than traffic<br />

signals with equivalent capacity. Opportunity costs for the alternative land uses will<br />

therefore constitute a major factor. On the other hand small roundabouts do not use large<br />

amounts of land, sometimes less than both signals and priority junctions with large scale<br />

channelization.<br />

4.2.7.5 Grade separated interchanges are far and away the most expensive in terms of construction<br />

cost irrespective of location. However in the Territory, where construction costs are<br />

sometimes dwarfed by land costs, compact grade separated designs may represent an<br />

economic alternative. Grade separated interchanges in rural areas are generally expensive in<br />

terms of land take as the opportunity cost of alternative lane uses may be low. However, in<br />

urban areas compact grade separated schemes have proved more cost effective than<br />

exclusively at-grade schemes requiring greater land take. The simplest example of compact<br />

grade separation is a flyover spanning one or more at-grade junctions, where the flyover is<br />

constructed within the at-grade road reserve, and turning movements are catered for below<br />

the elevated structure.<br />

4.2.7.6 An important aspect of the economic consideration is the feasibility of staged construction.<br />

Economic benefits may be obtained by deferring construction of part of a junction layout<br />

until traffic volumes increase sufficiently to warrant the more extensive design. Some<br />

junction types lend themselves more readily to staged construction than others, though more<br />

often the feasibility of staged construction will depend on the topography and traffic flows<br />

at the particular site. Junctions constructed initially as priority control lend themselves<br />

readily to future conversion into signal control and to a lesser extend small roundabouts.<br />

Planned conversion to a conventional roundabout design would normally require the<br />

uneconomical sterilization of a large area of land in the intervening years. Both<br />

conventional roundabouts and the larger traffic signal controlled junctions lend themselves<br />

to future conversion into grade separated junctions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!