14.01.2015 Views

The Protected Landscape Approach - Centre for Mediterranean ...

The Protected Landscape Approach - Centre for Mediterranean ...

The Protected Landscape Approach - Centre for Mediterranean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14. Collaborative management of protected<br />

landscapes: experience in Canada and the<br />

United States of America<br />

Nora Mitchell, Jacquelyn Tuxill, Guy Swinnerton, Susan Buggey<br />

and Jessica Brown<br />

Introduction<br />

This chapter explores some of the recent collaborative management experience with conserva -<br />

tion of protected landscapes in the United States and Canada. In both countries, national park<br />

systems – including natural areas, historical sites and culturally significant places – were<br />

created in the mid-nineteenth century. Both park systems began with a strategy of federal<br />

ownership and management of nationally important places in remote western areas and <strong>for</strong><br />

many years this government-based approach dominated the conservation agenda (<strong>for</strong> Canada<br />

see McNamee, 1994; MacEachern, 2001; <strong>for</strong> USA see Runte, 1979; Rettie, 1995; Sellars,<br />

1997). However, recent innovations have extended this approach to create more diverse<br />

protected area systems as well as a wide array of diverse management partnerships.<br />

In both countries conservation strategies now recognise multiple values, are more inclusive,<br />

encompass the interests of local communities and indigenous peoples, and craft collaborative<br />

management approaches that involve all key stakeholders. <strong>The</strong>se changes reflect a number of<br />

broader trends around the world, including an expanded understanding of the values of<br />

protected areas, both tangible and intangible (Harmon and Putney, 2003). In particular, re -<br />

cognition of the cultural value of landscapes has redefined the relationship of nature and<br />

culture, enhanced the conservation value of lived-in landscapes and broadened the potential<br />

stakeholder base <strong>for</strong> conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts (Rössler, 2000; UNESCO, 2003). <strong>The</strong> concept of<br />

protected landscapes, IUCN Category V, and the concurrent evolution of a new paradigm <strong>for</strong><br />

conservation represent changes to protected areas thinking and practice (Beres<strong>for</strong>d and<br />

Phillips, 2000; Phillips, 2002; Phillips, 2003a; Beres<strong>for</strong>d, 2003).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re has also been a growing recognition of the importance of partnerships and community<br />

engagement – even in the oldest and most traditional parks (Tuxill, Mitchell, and Brown 2004;<br />

Tuxill and Mitchell 2001; Sonoran Institute, 1997). <strong>The</strong> idea of stewardship – engaging people<br />

in taking care of places they value – puts communities in a leadership role in conservation, often<br />

referred to as community-based conservation (Brown and Mitchell, 2000a). Concurrently, the<br />

stewards of conservation areas have become more diverse – ranging from different levels of<br />

government and non-governmental organizations (such as land trusts), to private landowners<br />

and communities. In some cases, community-centred conservation ef<strong>for</strong>ts include innovative<br />

place-based education initiatives that lead to involving youth and cultivating the next genera -<br />

tion of stewards. <strong>The</strong>se shifts represent fundamental changes in both the conceptual framework<br />

and conservation practice in the United States and Canada.<br />

191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!