The Protected Landscape Approach - Centre for Mediterranean ...
The Protected Landscape Approach - Centre for Mediterranean ...
The Protected Landscape Approach - Centre for Mediterranean ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Protected</strong> <strong>Landscape</strong> <strong>Approach</strong>: Linking Nature, Culture and Community<br />
volume) and the integrated conservation and development programmes of the African<br />
‘Heartlands’ (Muruthe, 2000) are good illustrations of this.<br />
Thus the protected landscape model has a very wide application, and is now recognised as<br />
reflecting the attributes of what has become known as the “new paradigm <strong>for</strong> protected areas in<br />
the twenty-first century” (Beres<strong>for</strong>d and Phillips, 2000, and see Phillips in this volume).<br />
However, the management approach it represents has yet to be universally acknowledged and<br />
professional development <strong>for</strong> this complex approach is still in its infancy.<br />
<strong>Protected</strong> landscape management<br />
<strong>Protected</strong> landscape management represents a strategic and integrated “package” of manage -<br />
ment activities, which aims to link local development needs to the sustainable use of resources<br />
and the conservation of cultural heritage and biological diversity. As argued by Beres<strong>for</strong>d and<br />
Phillips (2000), the management objectives of protected landscapes can only be achieved<br />
through an inclusive approach “where local communities are treated as central to the future of<br />
the area” and where its management “is directed at enabling them to share in both the<br />
responsibility and benefits of designation.” Furthermore, working at the individual level,<br />
building and supporting a sense of landscape stewardship among land-users may be as<br />
important in some cases as working at the community level. Multi-sectoral and multi-level<br />
partnerships are by implication essential to this inclusive approach.<br />
Thus, while necessarily visionary and strategic in its approach, protected landscape manage -<br />
ment is extremely complex and has also to be highly adaptive, and sufficiently flexible to meet<br />
the needs and priorities of each and every area to which it is applied.<br />
In the IUCN publication Management Guidelines <strong>for</strong> IUCN Category V <strong>Protected</strong> Areas:<br />
<strong>Protected</strong> <strong>Landscape</strong>s/Seascapes, Phillips (2002) has developed practical guidance <strong>for</strong><br />
protected landscape managers to help them in the application of this intricate web of concepts<br />
and principles. Certainly, never be<strong>for</strong>e has protected area management been so complex,<br />
embracing a wide range of disciplines, requiring multiple skills, involving many interest groups<br />
and often demanding a highly sensitive approach.<br />
It is clear, there<strong>for</strong>e, that one of the most critical issues <strong>for</strong> protected landscapes is building<br />
the new professionalism required <strong>for</strong> the effective implementation of this challenging conser -<br />
vation approach. Given that our landscapes are now under enormous pressure from the<br />
seemingly immutable pace of modern development, it is only by providing conservation<br />
profes sionals with the appropriate conceptual framework, tools and techniques, that we can<br />
hope to manage change and conserve the best of what we have, <strong>for</strong> generations to come.<br />
As long ago as 1993, Parks <strong>for</strong> Life: Action <strong>for</strong> <strong>Protected</strong> Areas in Europe (IUCN, 1993)<br />
highlighted the critical need <strong>for</strong> professional development of protected area staff in general. It<br />
argued that “staff are vital to the effective management of protected areas and their training<br />
should be a top priority” (IUCN, 1993). It recommended that “each country should prepare and<br />
implement a training programme to provide regular training to staff of protected areas” …and<br />
that “the programme should ensure that staff at every level (including volunteers) are well<br />
trained initially and that their skills are continually developed and updated.” More than a<br />
decade on, there has been relatively little progress in this regard and it is certainly true to say (as<br />
222