JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States - Defense ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter II Notional Composition of a Civil-Military Operations Center UNICEF World Food Programme Department of Peacekeeping Operations High Commissioner for Refugees Other UN agencies UN USG Agencies Military CMOC Red Cross NGOs CARE Doctors of the World Save the Children International Rescue Committee Other relief and benefit organizations Legend CARE Cooperative for American Relief Everywhere CMOC civil-military operations center DART disaster assistance response team NGO nongovernmental organization OFDA Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance 11. Multinational Operations a. General OFDA/DART USAID Country team American Red Cross International Committee of the Red Cross Other Red Cross bodies UN UNICEF USAID United Nations United Nations Children’s Fund United States Agency for International Development United States Government Figure II-5. Notional Composition of a Civil-Military Operations Center (1) International partnerships continue to underpin unified efforts to address 21st century challenges. Shared principles, a common view of threats, and commitment to cooperation provide far greater security than the US could achieve independently. These partnerships must be nurtured and developed to ensure their relevance even as new challenges emerge. The ability of the US and its allies to work together to influence the global environment is fundamental to defeating 21st century threats. Wherever possible, the US works with or through other nations, enabling allied and partner capabilities to build their capacity and develop mechanisms to share the risks and responsibility of today’s complex challenges. (2) Operations conducted by forces of two or more nations are termed “multinational operations.” Such operations are usually undertaken within the structure of a coalition or alliance. Other possible arrangements include supervision by an IGO such as the UN or the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe. Other commonly used terms for multinational operations include allied, bilateral, or multilateral, as appropriate. USG II-20 JP 1
Doctrine Governing Unified Direction of Armed Forces (a) An alliance is a relationship that results from a formal agreement (e.g., treaty) between two or more nations for broad, long-term objectives that further the common interests of the members. Operations conducted with units from two or more allies are referred to as combined operations. (b) A coalition is an ad hoc arrangement between two or more nations for common action. Coalitions are formed by different nations with specific objectives, usually for a single occasion or for longer cooperation in a narrow sector of common interest. Operations conducted with units from two or more coalition members are referred to as coalition operations. (3) Cultural, psychological, religious, economic, technological, informational, and political factors as well as transnational dangers all impact multinational operations. Many contingency plans to deter or counter threats are prepared within the context of a treaty or alliance framework. Sometimes they are developed in a less structured coalition framework, based on temporary agreements or arrangements. Much of the information and guidance provided for unified action and joint operations are applicable to multinational operations. However, differences in laws, doctrine, organization, weapons, equipment, terminology, culture, politics, religion, and language within alliances and coalitions must be considered. Normally, each alliance or coalition develops its own plans and orders to guide multinational action. (4) No single command structure best fits the needs of all alliances and coalitions. Each coalition or alliance will create the structure that best meets the objectives, political realities, and constraints of the participating nations. Political considerations heavily influence the ultimate shape of the command structure. However, participating nations should strive to achieve unity of effort for the operation to the maximum extent possible, with missions, tasks, responsibilities, and authorities clearly defined and understood by all participants. While command relationships are well defined in US doctrine, they are not necessarily part of the doctrinal lexicon of nations in an alliance or coalition. b. Multinational Unity of Effort. Attaining unity of effort through unity of command for a multinational operation may not be politically feasible, but it should be a goal. There must be a common understanding among all national forces of the overall aim of the MNF and the plan for its attainment. A coordinated policy, particularly on such matters as multinational force commanders’ (MNFCs’) authority over national logistics (including infrastructure), ROE, fratricide prevention, and ISR is essential for unity of effort. While the tenets discussed below cannot guarantee success, ignoring them may lead to mission failure due to a lack of unity of effort. (1) Respect. In assigning missions, the commander must consider that national honor and prestige may be as important to a contributing nation as combat capability. All partners must be included in the planning process and their opinions must be sought in mission assignment. Understanding, consideration, and acceptance of partner ideas are essential to effective communication across cultures, as are respect for each partner’s culture, religion, customs, history, and values. Junior officers in command of small national II-21
Page 1 and 2:
Joint Publication 1 Doctrine for th
Page 3 and 4:
PREFACE 1. Scope This publication i
Page 5 and 6:
SUMMARY OF CHANGES REVISION OF JOIN
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents Awards and
Page 11 and 12:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY COMMANDER’S OVE
Page 13 and 14:
Executive Summary role for which an
Page 15 and 16:
Executive Summary The national defe
Page 17 and 18:
Executive Summary Relationship Betw
Page 19 and 20: Executive Summary Geographic Combat
Page 21 and 22: Executive Summary Joint Task Force
Page 23 and 24: Executive Summary direction over al
Page 25 and 26: Executive Summary Command and Contr
Page 27 and 28: Executive Summary Joint Education J
Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER I THEORY AND FOUNDATIONS
Page 31 and 32: Theory and Foundations power throug
Page 33 and 34: Theory and Foundations aspects. The
Page 35 and 36: Theory and Foundations usually have
Page 37 and 38: Theory and Foundations 6. Campaigns
Page 39 and 40: Theory and Foundations warfare may
Page 41 and 42: Theory and Foundations (b) Commande
Page 43 and 44: Theory and Foundations (1) Military
Page 45 and 46: Theory and Foundations funding and
Page 47 and 48: Theory and Foundations attack; pass
Page 49 and 50: Theory and Foundations applicable c
Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER II DOCTRINE GOVERNING UNIFI
Page 53 and 54: Doctrine Governing Unified Directio
Page 69: Doctrine Governing Unified Directio
Page 77 and 78: CHAPTER III FUNCTIONS OF THE DEPART
Page 79 and 80: Functions of the Department of Defe
Page 89 and 90: CHAPTER IV JOINT COMMAND ORGANIZATI
Page 91 and 92: Joint Command Organizations Possibl
Page 93 and 94: Joint Command Organizations JFC, fo
Page 95 and 96: Joint Command Organizations (2) Mai
Page 97 and 98: Joint Command Organizations 3. Spec
Page 99 and 100: Joint Command Organizations Joint T
Page 101 and 102: Joint Command Organizations (2) Pro
Page 103 and 104: Joint Command Organizations nongove
Page 105 and 106: Joint Command Organizations (8) Pro
Page 107 and 108: Joint Command Organizations adminis
Page 109 and 110: Joint Command Organizations d. Exec
Page 111 and 112: Joint Command Organizations 21. Inf
Page 113 and 114: CHAPTER V JOINT COMMAND AND CONTROL
Page 115 and 116: Joint Command and Control b. Unless
Page 117 and 118: Joint Command and Control as requir
Page 119 and 120: Joint Command and Control (6) Assig
Page 121 and 122:
Joint Command and Control (5) The d
Page 123 and 124:
Joint Command and Control 8. Comman
Page 125 and 126:
Joint Command and Control applicabl
Page 127 and 128:
Joint Command and Control while con
Page 129 and 130:
Joint Command and Control the JFC a
Page 131 and 132:
Joint Command and Control purpose i
Page 133 and 134:
CHAPTER VI JOINT FORCE DEVELOPMENT
Page 135 and 136:
Joint Force Development 4. Joint Do
Page 137 and 138:
Joint Force Development (3) Joint e
Page 139 and 140:
Joint Force Development requirement
Page 141 and 142:
Joint Force Development b. The Join
Page 143 and 144:
Joint Force Development capabilitie
Page 145 and 146:
1. General APPENDIX A ESTABLISHING
Page 147 and 148:
APPENDIX B THE PROFESSION OF ARMS 1
Page 149 and 150:
The Profession of Arms 4. Teamwork
Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX C REFERENCES The developme
Page 153 and 154:
References g. CJCSM 3122.01A, Joint
Page 155 and 156:
APPENDIX D ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTI
Page 157 and 158:
GLOSSARY PART I—ABBREVIATIONS AND
Page 159 and 160:
Glossary NATO NCCS NDS NEP NGA NGB
Page 161 and 162:
PART II—TERMS AND DEFINITIONS acc
Page 163 and 164:
Glossary Department of Defense comp
Page 165 and 166:
Glossary joint staff. 1. The staff
Page 167 and 168:
Glossary Service. A branch of the A
Page 169 and 170:
Glossary unity of effort. Coordinat
Page 171:
JOINT DOCTRINE PUBLICATIONS HIERARC
show all

JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States - Defense ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?