14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
— that is, governed by random processes. Yet significant<br />
research is devoted to produce ever more detailed models<br />
of single elements in the ‘whole system’ (featuring, for<br />
example, better representations of the hydrodynamic<br />
processes, or increasingly fine-grained terrain models). The<br />
results of such reductionist models are easily communicated,<br />
but they fail to support <strong>risk</strong>-based choices — for although<br />
they simulate inundation in fine detail, they are based on<br />
gross assumptions such as the location, timing, and growth<br />
of a breach in the relevant flood defences.<br />
But analysts increasingly recognize the need to support<br />
robust decisions 4 , and to do this their models must<br />
represent all important aspects of that decision and be<br />
truthful about the uncertainty of the <strong>evidence</strong> presented.<br />
Here lies a bear trap. Any presentation of uncertainty is<br />
typically viewed as ‘comprehensive’, yet it often reflects only<br />
a few easily-described uncertainties (known unknowns).<br />
These uncertainties may lie in the data, such as errors<br />
in the measured height of flood defences, or in model<br />
components such as the assessment of defence overtopping.<br />
Although significant progress is now being made 5 , the ability<br />
to communicate uncertainty meaningfully — in a way that<br />
reflects data, model, and crucially model-structure errors —<br />
remains poor.<br />
THE INFRASTRUCTURE<br />
PLANNER’S PERSPECTIVE<br />
The planner of flood <strong>risk</strong>-management infrastructure<br />
faces a significant and growing <strong>risk</strong>, but also considerable<br />
uncertainty. Both coastal and inland flooding remain high on<br />
the UK’s National Risk Register, with significant concerns<br />
around the three main sources of flooding: rivers, surface<br />
water and especially the sea. In 2012, the UK’s Climate<br />
Change Risk Assessment identified an increase in the <strong>risk</strong> of<br />
flooding as the greatest threat to the country from climate<br />
change, requiring significant adaptation planning 6 .<br />
The challenge of flooding in the United Kingdom was<br />
also demonstrated dramatically in the winter of 2013–<strong>14</strong>,<br />
which saw unprecedented levels of rainfall in southern<br />
England and the largest tidal surge in 60 years. Transport<br />
infrastructure was widely disrupted, and some agricultural<br />
land was flooded for several weeks. Yet although some 7,000<br />
properties were flooded, some 1.4 million properties in<br />
England were protected by flood defences over the course<br />
of the winter storms, and there was no loss of life as a<br />
direct result of the December 2013 surge. The 1953 surge<br />
of a similar magnitude killed 307 people along our east coast<br />
and caused losses that were the equivalent of at least £1<br />
billion in today’s money.<br />
There have been some notable infrastructure successes.<br />
The past 50 years have seen substantial investment in flood<br />
<strong>risk</strong> management, with significant outlay on forecasting, flood<br />
warning and a range of flood defences. These worked well in<br />
2013–<strong>14</strong>, although they were tested to the extreme in many<br />
cases, with approximately £<strong>14</strong>0 million of damage caused<br />
to our flood defences. Moreover, controversy remains a<br />
constant theme: there were claims that agricultural land and<br />
livelihoods were sacrificed to protect assets within urban<br />
areas, allegedly the result of a transfer in the <strong>risk</strong> burden<br />
from the town to the country.<br />
Flood infrastructure planners have been innovative in the<br />
past, and this is continuing. Improved forecasting models,<br />
better flood warning and world-class defence systems<br />
such as the Thames Barrier have all involved <strong>innovation</strong><br />
in response to <strong>risk</strong>, requiring political commitment,<br />
time and investment 7 . As leaders on this issue, the UK’s<br />
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and<br />
the Environment Agency are embedding a consideration<br />
of long-term <strong>risk</strong>s in their planning, because infrastructure<br />
investments are required to meet changing <strong>risk</strong>s up to 100<br />
years into the future. The Thames Estuary 2100 Plan is an<br />
excellent example of such foresight 7 .<br />
However, the improvements in defences have led to<br />
significant developments of homes, businesses and the<br />
infrastructure that supports them (water, electricity and<br />
telecommunications) in flood <strong>risk</strong> areas. This in turn changes<br />
the <strong>risk</strong> because the consequences of flooding are now<br />
greater. Looking forward, socio-economic growth across<br />
Europe is estimated to account for about two-thirds of the<br />
change in <strong>risk</strong> of flooding by 2050, with the remaining onethird<br />
coming from climate change.<br />
Managing this changing <strong>risk</strong> requires a long-term vision<br />
for flood <strong>risk</strong> management and the ability to respond to<br />
changing circumstances on a shorter-term basis. It requires<br />
us to decide what level of <strong>risk</strong> we are prepared to accept<br />
in protecting existing properties from flooding, and the<br />
extent to which we should veto development on flood<br />
plains to prevent <strong>risk</strong> escalation. This demands a robust<br />
and transparent implementation of spatial planning policy.<br />
The government’s new ‘partnership funding’ approach<br />
to flood defence spending also requires new forms of<br />
local involvement in order to secure the maximum <strong>risk</strong><br />
reduction 8 . Meanwhile, effective <strong>risk</strong> reduction is being<br />
greatly assisted by a continuation of the research-led<br />
<strong>innovation</strong> that has served us so well over the past 50 years.<br />
Coastal and inland flooding<br />
remain high on the UK’s<br />
National Risk Register, with<br />
significant concerns around<br />
the three main sources of<br />
flooding: rivers, surface<br />
water and especially the sea.<br />
103