14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CASE STUDY<br />
ADAPTING REGULATION TO CHANGING EVIDENCE ON RISKS:<br />
DELIVERING CHANGES TO PIG INSPECTION<br />
Patrick Miller (Food Standards Agency)<br />
74<br />
The UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) has led<br />
efforts to reform pig inspection, drawing on<br />
<strong>evidence</strong> about the changing nature of health<br />
<strong>risk</strong>s from meat — and about the behaviours of those<br />
involved in meat production — to introduce new<br />
controls that better reflect the <strong>risk</strong>s and the realities of<br />
inspection in practice.<br />
Meat controls are currently based on a traditional<br />
inspection approach, developed over 100 years ago to<br />
tackle the public health concerns of that era, such as<br />
parasites and defects visible to the naked eye. Today, the<br />
main causes of foodborne disease are microbiological.<br />
Pathogens such as Salmonella, Campylobacter and<br />
Escherichia coli cannot be tackled adequately using<br />
traditional inspection methods.<br />
Meat controls are a key part of European Union food<br />
safety controls and any changes need the support of<br />
the European Commission, EU member states, industry<br />
and stakeholders. As such, these changes must be<br />
based on solid <strong>evidence</strong> and reflect practical realities<br />
and stakeholder concerns in order to win confidence<br />
that any change will be more <strong>risk</strong>-based, effective and<br />
proportionate.<br />
This takes time, but it ensures that we can be clear<br />
about our objectives and gather <strong>evidence</strong> on how best<br />
to meet them. For consumers, that means greater<br />
confidence in meat safety and better protection from<br />
<strong>risk</strong>s from meat; as a regulator, it ensures the effective<br />
use of public funds in controlling foodborne pathogens<br />
and reducing costs for society from foodborne illness;<br />
for business, it lowers the cost of regulation; and for<br />
enforcers, it offers a more objective approach and<br />
better use of resources, according to <strong>risk</strong> and impact.<br />
Developing the <strong>evidence</strong> base<br />
The FSA’s research programme on modernizing meat<br />
controls aims to:<br />
• establish the effectiveness of current and alternative<br />
approaches to meat inspection;<br />
• build a robust <strong>evidence</strong> base<br />
to support a case for reform.<br />
It includes veterinary<br />
and <strong>risk</strong>-assessment<br />
research, as well as social<br />
science research to understand<br />
attitudes and behaviours that affect<br />
the effectiveness of controls in practice. The European<br />
Food Safety Authority (EFSA) also provided a series<br />
of independent expert scientific opinions related<br />
to inspection of meat, and together with the FSA’s<br />
research these formed the basis for initial proposals for<br />
changes to pig meat inspection.<br />
Openness and engagement<br />
Alongside this process, FSA followed an active<br />
programme of engagement and communication with<br />
interested parties, including the European Commission,<br />
EU member states, European Parliament the meat<br />
industry, UK agricultural departments, EFSA experts,<br />
and consumers.<br />
This engagement was aided by a high degree of<br />
openness, with information on the programme’s<br />
objectives, research, developing proposals, and the<br />
supporting <strong>evidence</strong>, published and discussed by the<br />
FSA Board in open meetings 1 . A consultation on the<br />
proposed changes ran from March–May 20<strong>14</strong>, with<br />
extensive communication on formal introduction of<br />
the new inspection regime, and training to support<br />
implementation.<br />
Outcome<br />
The new package targets <strong>risk</strong>s better by:<br />
• Removing controls that did not help to reduce<br />
pathogen levels in meat, and in fact actually helped to<br />
spread contamination (through physical palpation and<br />
incision of carcases), thus increasing consumer <strong>risk</strong> — a<br />
serious unintended consequence of the old regime.<br />
• Tightening controls that can reduce contamination<br />
levels in meat, including controls on Salmonella and <strong>risk</strong>based<br />
testing for the parasite Trichinella.<br />
It therefore targets resources at the real <strong>risk</strong>s in ways<br />
that will control them more effectively. The package has<br />
received broad support from stakeholders. The FSA is<br />
now funding research to help evaluate how the changes<br />
operate in practice, and how<br />
to monitor their impact.<br />
The FSA will explore<br />
the scope to extend this<br />
approach in other species<br />
(poultry, cattle and sheep),<br />
again following an open and<br />
<strong>evidence</strong>-based approach.