14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
production of unconventional hydrocarbons by prohibiting<br />
the use of hydraulic fracturing. The conclusion of the report<br />
written by senior officials was the following:<br />
“The brutal and highly publicized eruption in France of<br />
the issue of shale gas — which has been underway for more<br />
than fifteen years in the United States, leading an upheaval<br />
in the country’s energy balances — has not allowed the<br />
initiation of a serene technical and democratic debate at the<br />
desirable pace.”<br />
“The techniques used have all, when considered one<br />
by one, long been practiced (horizontal drilling, hydraulic<br />
fracturing, use of chemical additives etc.). It is the<br />
combination of these techniques that is innovative and<br />
allows the possibility of an economically viable operation.<br />
This combination, with the prospect of large-scale<br />
development in areas not accustomed to oil techniques,<br />
clearly raises concerns with regard to the <strong>risk</strong>s involved.”<br />
“Since spring 2011, some European states have taken a<br />
significant part in the debate, with different results. Due<br />
to a more entrenched environmental sensitivity and to<br />
their urban concentrations, European countries are in a<br />
context that is not directly comparable to that of United<br />
States. The development of unconventional hydrocarbons in<br />
our continent will never reach the scale and speed of the<br />
combined experience of the United States over 20 years.<br />
Moreover, whatever the economic interest of the subsoil<br />
resources, it must be balanced with the inclusion of other<br />
assets regarding the territory, such as agriculture, natural<br />
heritage, tourism, etc.”<br />
It should be highlighted that the law was passed after a<br />
Parliamentary report and a Parliamentary debate, which is<br />
one of the best expressions of democracy. But this process<br />
took place before any scientific report could be written to<br />
clarify, from a scientific point of view, the different issues<br />
raised by the possibility of producing unconventional<br />
hydrocarbons.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It is clear that French society encounters problems when<br />
debating regulatory frameworks for new technologies in<br />
order to find the conditions under which such development<br />
could take place, or to decide about the research necessary<br />
to determine whether this development is desirable or not.<br />
The cancellation of a number of public meetings and the<br />
uprooting of some GMO tests emphasize the need to invent<br />
other forms of public participation. More generally, it leads<br />
us to consider that several barriers remain in debating such<br />
issues, some of which are specific to French society.<br />
3. A deteriorating link between science and society<br />
3.1. “The precautionary principle”: a culprit too<br />
quickly identified<br />
The precautionary principle was introduced into the<br />
Constitution after a vote of approval on the Environmental<br />
Charter by the French Parliament in Congress at Versailles<br />
in March 2005:<br />
“Art. 5 – When the occurrence of any damage, albeit<br />
unpredictable in the current state of scientific knowledge,<br />
It is clear that French<br />
society encounters<br />
problems when debating<br />
regulatory frameworks for<br />
new technologies.<br />
may seriously and irreversibly harm the environment, public<br />
authorities shall, with due respect for the precautionary<br />
principle and the areas within their jurisdiction, ensure the<br />
implementation of procedures for <strong>risk</strong> assessment and the<br />
adoption of temporary measures commensurate with the<br />
<strong>risk</strong> involved in order to deal with the occurrence of such<br />
damage”.<br />
Prior to the inclusion of the Environmental Charter in the<br />
Constitution, there was vigorous debate between those who<br />
wished to adopt some measures to avoid major damage to<br />
the environment, even in uncertain cases, and those who<br />
opposed them, arguing that they might inhibit economic<br />
initiative and technological <strong>innovation</strong>. Nearly ten years after<br />
its publication, two points need to be made:<br />
• In legal terms, the precautionary principle has seldom been<br />
applied.<br />
• Nevertheless, more and more public decisions take<br />
that principle as a reference. And, by the way, some of<br />
them seem to be taken under emotional stress, without<br />
relying on scientific knowledge. Therefore, it seems logical<br />
to remember that public decisions must be based on<br />
independent and multidisciplinary scientific expertise.<br />
The issue at stake is not about being for or against GMOs<br />
or shale gas. It must be recalled that, under the current<br />
charter of the environment, ‘<strong>risk</strong> assessments’ must be<br />
implemented, temporary measures adopted and a research<br />
program has to be designed to resolve the possible<br />
uncertainties. The implementation of <strong>risk</strong> assessments<br />
should lead to an explicit formulation of the unresolved<br />
scientific issue — in a transparent way — and to the<br />
implementation of a research program to treat these issues<br />
rather than to continue discussing sterile arguments. But<br />
such assessments are often lacking.<br />
In fact, <strong>innovation</strong> is not stifled in France by the<br />
precautionary principle but rather by a certain mindset<br />
in society and a growing distrust towards technological<br />
progress and scientists (see also the case study on <strong>risk</strong> and<br />
precaution). As a result, some technologies are de facto<br />
blocked, without any scientific debate on the unresolved<br />
questions. On the other hand, in some areas, some<br />
industries are tempted to continue their work without any<br />
transparency.<br />
<strong>14</strong>9