14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
structural model. Risk Analysis 12(3), 417-429<br />
(1992).<br />
43. Poortinga, W. & Pidgeon, N.F. Exploring the<br />
dimensionality of trust in <strong>risk</strong> regulation. Risk<br />
Analysis 23, 961-972 (2003).<br />
44. Cabinet Office Risk: Improving Government’s<br />
Capability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty.<br />
(HMSO 2002).<br />
45. Johnson, B. B. Exploring dimensionality in the<br />
origins of hazard related trust. Journal of Risk<br />
Research, 2(4), 325-354 (1999).<br />
46. Siegrist, M., Earle, T.C. & Gutscher, H. Trust<br />
in Cooperative Risk Management. (Earthscan:<br />
London, 2007).<br />
47. Walls, J., Pidgeon, N.F., Weyman, A. &<br />
Horlick-Jones, T. Critical trust: understanding<br />
lay perceptions of health and safety <strong>risk</strong><br />
regulation. Health, Risk and Society 6(2), 133-<br />
150 (2004).<br />
48. O’Neill, O. A Question of Trust (Cambridge<br />
University Press, 2002).<br />
49. Fischhoff, B. Risk perception and<br />
communication unplugged: twenty years of<br />
process. Risk Analysis 15, 137-<strong>14</strong>5 (1995).<br />
50. Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. Fairness<br />
and Competence in Citizen Participation:<br />
Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse<br />
(Kluwer, 1995).<br />
51. Stern, P.C., Fineberg, H.C. Understanding Risk:<br />
Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (US<br />
National Research Council: Washington DC,<br />
1996).<br />
52. Pidgeon, N.F., Demski, C.C, Butler, C., Parkhill,<br />
K.A. & Spence, A. Creating a national citizen<br />
engagement process for energy policy.<br />
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<br />
of the USA, DOI10.1073/pnas.1317512111<br />
(20<strong>14</strong>).<br />
Section 3 High Level Case Study: Flooding<br />
1. Harries, T. The anticipated emotional<br />
consequences of adaptive behaviour – impacts<br />
on the take-up of household flood-protection<br />
protective measures. Environment and Planning<br />
A 44, 649-668 (2012).<br />
2. Johnson, C., Penning-Rowsell, E.C. and Parker,<br />
D.J. Natural and imposed injustices: the<br />
challenges in implementing ‘fair’ flood <strong>risk</strong><br />
management policy in England. Geographical<br />
Journal 173, 374-390 (2007).<br />
3. Sayers, P.B., Galloway, G., Penning-Rowsell,<br />
E.C., Li, Y., Shen, F., Chen, Y., Wen, K., Le<br />
Quesne, T., Lei, W. and Yuhui, G. Strategic<br />
flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to<br />
guide a sound approach. International Journal<br />
of River Basin Management (20<strong>14</strong>). DOI:<br />
10.1080/15715124.20<strong>14</strong>.902378<br />
4. Sayers, P., Galloway, G., & Hall, J. Robust<br />
decision making under uncertainty – Towards<br />
adaptive and resilient flood <strong>risk</strong> management<br />
infrastructure. In P. Sayers, Flood Risk: Design,<br />
Management and Planning of Flood Defence<br />
Infrastructure (Institution of Civil Engineers<br />
Publishing, London, 2012).<br />
5. Hall, J. and Solomatine, D. A framework for<br />
uncertainty analysis in flood <strong>risk</strong> management<br />
decisions. International Journal of River<br />
Basin Management 6, 85-98 (2008). DOI:<br />
10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339<br />
6. UK climate change <strong>risk</strong> assessment: Government<br />
report (Department for Environment, Food<br />
and Rural Affairs, London, 2012). Available at<br />
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/<br />
uk-climate-change-<strong>risk</strong>-assessmentgovernment-report<br />
7. Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Haigh, N., Lavery, S.,<br />
and McFadden L. A threatened world city: The<br />
benefits of protecting London from the sea.<br />
Natural Hazards 66, 1383-<strong>14</strong>04 (2012). DOI:<br />
10.1007/s11069-011-0075-3<br />
8. Flood defence partnership funding (Department<br />
for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,<br />
London, 20<strong>14</strong>). Available at https://www.gov.<br />
uk/government/publications/flood-defencepartnership-funding<br />
Chapter 9: Context Matters to Human<br />
Perception and Response<br />
1. Wynne, B. Redefining the issue of <strong>risk</strong> and<br />
public acceptance – the social viability of<br />
technology. Futures 15, 13-32 (1983)<br />
2. Renn, O. & Rohrmann, B. (eds) Cross-cultural<br />
<strong>risk</strong> perception: A survey of empirical studies.<br />
(Springer Verlag, Dordrecht, 2000)<br />
3. Kates, R.W. The interaction of climate and<br />
society. In: Climate Impact Assessment, R.W.<br />
Kates , J.H. Ausubel & M.Berberian (eds), pp.<br />
5-36. COPE 27 (John Wiley & Son, Chichester,<br />
UK, 1985)<br />
4. Petts, J., Horlick-Jones, T. & Murdock, G. Social<br />
amplification of <strong>risk</strong>: the media and the public.<br />
Contract Research Report 329/2001, (Health<br />
and Safety Executive, Sudbury . 2001). Horlick-<br />
Jones, T. (2008) Communities of <strong>risk</strong> research<br />
and <strong>risk</strong> practice: Divided by a common<br />
language. Journal of Risk Research 11(1-2), 169-<br />
174 (2008)<br />
5. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Availability: A<br />
Heuristic for Judging frequency and probability.<br />
Cognitive Psychology 4, 207-232 (1973)<br />
6. Whitmarsh, L.. Are flood victims more<br />
concerned about climate change than other<br />
people? The role of direct experience in <strong>risk</strong><br />
perception and behavioural response. Journal<br />
of Risk Research 11(3), 351-374 (2008)<br />
7. Green, D., Billy, J. & Tapim, A. Indigenous<br />
Australian’s knowledge of weather and climate.<br />
Climate Change 100, 337-354, (2010). Lefale, P.<br />
Ua ‘afa le Aso Stormy weather today: traditional<br />
ecological knowledge of weather and climate.<br />
The Samoa Experience. Climatic Change 100,<br />
317-335 (2010). Gearheard, S., Pocernich,<br />
M., Stewart, J., Sanguya, J & Huntington, H.P.<br />
Linking Inuit knowledge and meteorological<br />
stations’ observations to understand changing<br />
patterns of Clyde River, Nunavut. Climatic<br />
Change 100, 267-294 (2010)<br />
8. Wynne, B. Risk and social learning: reification<br />
to engagement. In: Social Theories of Risk (eds.<br />
S Krimsky & D. Golding, pp. 275-300. (Praeger,<br />
Westport, CT. 1992)<br />
9. Kunreuther, H & Michel-Kerjan, E. Encouraging<br />
Adaptation to Climate Change: Long-term Flood<br />
Insurance. Issue Brief 09-13. (Resources for the<br />
Future, Washington DC, 2009).<br />
10. Greenberg, M. Energy sources, public policy<br />
and public preferences; analysis of US national<br />
and site-specific data. Energy Policy 37(8),<br />
3242-49 (2009)<br />
11. Sadhra, S., Petts, J., McAlpine, S., Pattison, H. &<br />
McRae, S. Workers’ understanding of chemical<br />
<strong>risk</strong>s; electroplating case study. Occupational<br />
and Environmental Medicine 59(10), 689-695<br />
(2002)<br />
12. Fleming, S.M., Thomas, C.L. & Dolan, R.J.<br />
Overcoming status quo bias in the human<br />
brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of<br />
Sciences 107, 6005-6009 (2010)<br />
13. Harries, T. Feeling secure or being secure. Why<br />
it might seem better not to protect yourself<br />
against a natural hazard. Health, Risk & Society<br />
10(5), 479-90 (2008)<br />
<strong>14</strong>. Petts, J. The public-expert interface in local<br />
waste management decisions: expertise,<br />
credibility and process. Public Understanding of<br />
Science 6(4), 359-82 (1997)<br />
15. Poumadère, M. & Mays, C. The dynamics of<br />
<strong>risk</strong> amplification and attenuation in context:<br />
a French case study. In: The Social Amplification<br />
of Risk , N, Pidgeon, R.E. Kasperson & P. Slovic<br />
(eds); pp. 209-242. (Cambridge University<br />
Press. 2003)<br />
16. Kasperson, R.E. & Kasperson, J.X. Hidden<br />
Hazards. In: Acceptable Evidence: Science and<br />
Value in Hazard Management, D.C. Mayo & R.<br />
Hollander (eds)., pp.9-28. (Oxford University<br />
Press, 1991)<br />
17. Macnaghten, P., Carro-Ripalda, S. & Burity, J.<br />
(eds) A New Approach to Governing GM Crops:<br />
Global Lessons from the Rising Powers. Durham<br />
University Working Paper,( Durham, UK ,<br />
20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
18. Davis, C. & Fisk, J.M. Energy abundance of<br />
environmental worries? Analysing public<br />
support for fracking in the United States.<br />
Review of Policy Research 31(1), 1-16, (20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
Boudet, H. et al. ‘Fracking’ controversy and<br />
communication; using national survey data to<br />
understand public perceptions of hydraulic<br />
fracturing. Energy Policy 65, 57-67 (20<strong>14</strong>)<br />
19. Scafft, K.A., Borlu, Y. & Glenna, L. The<br />
relationship between Marcellus shale gas<br />
development in Pennsylvania and local<br />
perceptions of <strong>risk</strong> and opportunity. Rural<br />
Sociology 78(2), <strong>14</strong>3-168 (2013)<br />
20. Batel, S. & Devine-Wright, P. A critical<br />
and empirical analysis of the nationallocal<br />
gap in public responses to largescale<br />
energy infrastructures. Journal of<br />
Environmental Planning and Management, DOI:<br />
10.1080/09640568.20<strong>14</strong>.9<strong>14</strong>020<br />
21. Wynne, B & Dressel, K. Cultures of<br />
uncertainty – transboundary <strong>risk</strong>s and BSE in<br />
Europe. In: Transboundary Risk Management, J.<br />
Linnerooth-Bayer, R.E. Lofstedt & G. Sjostedt,<br />
pp. 121-154, (Earthscan Publications Ltd,<br />
London. 2001)<br />
22. Levidow, L. Genetically modified crops: what<br />
transboundary harmonisation in Europe?. In:<br />
Transboundary Risk Management, J. Linnerooth-<br />
Bayer, R.E. Lofstedt & G. Sjostedt, pp. 59-90,<br />
(Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, 2001)<br />
23. Lofstedt, R. Risk versus hazard. How to<br />
regulate in the 21 st Century. European Journal<br />
of Risk Regulaiton 2(2), <strong>14</strong>9-168, 2011<br />
24. Scheer, D., Benighaus, C., Benighaus, L., Renn,<br />
O., Gold, S., Röder, B & Böl, G-F. The distinction<br />
between <strong>risk</strong> and hazard: understanding and<br />
use in stakeholder communications. Risk<br />
Analysis 34(7), 1270-1285, 20<strong>14</strong><br />
25. Macnaghten, P & Jacobs, M. Public identification<br />
with sustainable development: investigating<br />
cultural barriers to participation. Global<br />
Environmental Change, 7(1), 5-24 (1997)<br />
26. Harvatt, J., Petts, J. & Chilvers, J. Understanding<br />
householder responses to natural hazards:<br />
flooding and sea level rise comparisons. Journal<br />
of Risk Research <strong>14</strong>(1-2), 63-82 (2011)<br />
167