14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence

166
food.gov.uk/enforcement/monitoring/meat/
reviewofmeatcontrols/
Chapter 6 Case Study: Accurate
Communication of Medical Risk
1. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. The framing of
decisions and the psychology of choice. Science
211, 453–458 (1981).
2. Sheridan, S. L. and Pignone, M. Numeracy and
the medical student’s ability to interpret data.
Effective Clinical Practice 5, 35–40 (2002).
3. Medicines and Healthcare Products
Regulatory Agency Side effects of
medicines – FAQ (2013). Available at http://
www.mhra.gov.uk/Safetyinformation/
Generalsafetyinformationandadvice/
Adviceandinformationforconsumers/
Sideeffectsofmedicines
4. Berry, D. C., Holden, W. and Bersellini, E.
Interpretation of recommended risk terms:
differences between doctors and lay people.
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 12,
117–124 (2004).
5. Knapp, P., Raynor, D. K., Woolf, E., Gardner, P. H.,
Carrigan, N. and McMillan, B. Communicating
the risk of side effects to patients. Drug Safety
32, 837–849 (2009).
6. Cummins, C., Sauerland, U. and Solt, S.
Granularity and scalar implicature in numerical
expressions. Linguistics & Philosophy 35, 135–
169 (2012).
Section 2 High Level Case Study: Hydraulic
Fracturing
1. Mair, R. et al. Shale gas extraction in the UK: a
review of hydraulic fracturing (The Royal Society
and The Royal Academy of Engineering, 2012).
Available at https://royalsociety.org/~/media/
policy/projects/shale-gas-extraction/2012-06-
28-shale-gas.pdf
Chapter 7: How People Estimate Risks in
Everyday Life
1. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. Availability:
A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and
Probability. Cognitive Psychology 5, 207-232
(1973).
2. Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar,
Straus and Giroux, New York, 2012).
3. Gigerenzer, G. Risk Savvy: How to Make Good
Decisions (Allen Lane, London, 2014).
4. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. Prospect
Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.
Econometrica 47, 263-291 (1979).
5. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K.
and Welch, N. Risks as Feeling. Psych. Bull. 127,
267-286 (2001).
6. Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. Nudge:
Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and
Happinness (Yale University Press, New Haven,
2008)
Chapter 8: Perceptions of Risk
1. Kates, R.W. & Kasperson, X.J. Comparative
risk analysis of technological hazards.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the USA 80, 7027-7038 (1983).
2. Rosa, E.A. & Clarke, L. Collective hunch?
Risk as the real and the elusive. Journal of
Environmental Studies and Science 2, 39-52
(2012).
3. Pidgeon, N.F., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B.
& Gibson, R. in Risk – Analysis, Perception and
Management: Report of a Royal Society Study
Group (eds F. Warner et al) 89-134 (The Royal
Society, 1992).
4. Pidgeon, N.F. & Gregory, R. (2004) in Blackwell
Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (eds
D. Koehler & N. Harvey) 604-623 (Blackwell).
5. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. (Earthscan:
London).
6. Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K. &
Welch, N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin
127(2), 267-286 (2001).
7. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E. & MacGregor,
D.G. in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of
Intuitive Judgment (eds T. Gilovich, D. Griffin &
D. Kahnman) 397-420 (Cambridge University
Press, 2002).
8. Pidgeon, N.F. & Fischhoff, B. The role of social
and decision sciences in communicating
uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change
1, 35-41 (2011).
9. Breakwell, G. The Psychology of Risk (Cambridge
University Press, 2007).
10. Joffe, H. Risk: from perception to social
representation. British Journal of Social
Psychology 42, 55-73 (2003).
11. Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. Risk and Culture: An
Analysis of the Selection of Technological Dangers.
(University of California Press 1982).
12. Rayner, S. Cultural theory and risk analysis in
Social Theories of Risk (S. Krimsky & D. Golding)
83-116 (Praeger, 1992).
13. Rippl, S. Cultural theory and risk perceptions:
a proposal for better measurement. Journal of
Risk Research, 5(2), 147-166 (2002).
14. Kahan, D.M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gastil, J. &
Cohen, G. (2009). Cultural cognition of the
risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nature
Nanotechnology 4, 87-91
15. Corner, A., Venables, D., Spence, A., Poortinga,
W., Demski, C. & Pidgeon, N.F. Nuclear power,
climate change and energy security: exploring
British public attitudes. Energy Policy, 39, 4823-
4833 (2011).
16. Whitfield, S.C., Rosa, E.A., Dan, A. & Dietz,
T. The future of nuclear power: Value
orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis
29 (3),425-437 (2009).
17. Corner, A., Markowitz, E. & Pidgeon, N.F. Public
engagement with climate change: the role
of human values. WIREs Climate Change, doi:
10.1002/wcc.269 (2014).
18. Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L.,
Capstick, S. & Pidgeon, N. Uncertain climate:
An investigation into public scepticism
about anthropogenic climate change. Global
Environmental Change 21, 1015-1024 (2011).
19. Feinberg, M. & Willer, R. The moral roots of
environmental attitudes. Psychological Science,
24, 56-62 (2013).
20. Corner, A. A new conversation with the
centre-right about climate change: Values,
frames & narratives. (Climate Outreach
& Information Network/BRASS Research
Centre, Cardiff University 2013).
21. Davidson, D.J. & Freudenburg, W.R. Gender
and environment risk concerns: a review and
analysis of available research. Environment and
Behaviour 28 (3), 302-329 (1996).
22. Henwood, K.L, Parkhill, K. & Pidgeon, N
Science, technology and risk perception: From
gender differences to effects made by gender.
Journal of Equal Opportunities International 27(8),
662-676 (2008).
23. Beck, U. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity
(Sage, 1992).
24. Giddens, A. The Consequences of Modernity
(Polity Press, 1990).
25. Tulloch, J. & Lupton, D. Risk and Everyday Life
(Sage, 2003).
26. Henwood, K.L. & Pidgeon, N.F. What is the
Relationship between Identity and Technological,
Economic, Demographic, Environmental and
Political Change viewed through a Risk Lens?
Foresight Future Identities Project (Government
Office of Science: London, 2013).
27. Packer, G. The Unwinding: An Inner History of the
New America (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013)
28. Pidgeon, N.F. Complexity, Uncertainty and
Future Risks. Journal of Risk Research DOI
10.1080/13669877.2014.940599 (2014).
29. Henwood, K.L. & Pidgeon, N.F. in The Ethics
of Nuclear Energy: Risk, Justice and Democracy
in the Post-Fukushima Era (ed. B. Taebi & S.
Roeser) (Cambridge University Press, 2015)
30. Irwin, A., Simmons, P. & Walker, G., Faulty
environments and risk reasoning: the
local understanding of industrial hazards.
Environment and Planning A 31, 1311-26 (1999).
31. Bickerstaff, K. & Walker, G. Public
understandings of air pollution: the
‘localisation’ of environmental risk. Global
Environmental Change 11, 133-145 (2001).
32. Parkhill, K.A., Pidgeon, N.F., Henwood, K.L.,
Simmons, P. & Venables, D. From the familiar to
the extraordinary: local residents’ perceptions
of risk when living with nuclear power in
the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British
Geographers NS 35, 39-58 (2010).
33. Bickerstaff, K., Simmons, P. & Pidgeon. N.F.
Situating local experience of risk: peripherality,
marginality and place identity in the UK foot
and mouth disease crisis. Geoforum 37, 844-
858 (2006).
34. Bruine de Bruin, W. & Bostrom, A. Assessing
what to address in science communication.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the USA 110 (sup 3), 14062-14068 (2001).
35. Satterfield, T. In search of value literacy:
Suggestions for the elicitation of
environmental values. Environmental Values, 10,
331-359 (2001).
36. Henwood, K.L., Pidgeon, N.F., Sarre, S.,
Simmons, P. & Smith, N. Risk, framing and
everyday life: methodological and ethical
reflections from three sociocultural projects.
Health, Risk and Society 10, 421-438 (2008).
37. Pidgeon, N.F. & Barnett, J. Chalara and the Social
Amplification of Risk (Defra, 2013).
38. Kasperson, J.X. & Kasperson, R.K. in Acceptable
Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management
(ed D. Mayo & R. Hollander) 9-28 (Oxford
University Press, 1991).
39. House of Lords Select Committee on Science
and Technology Third Report: Science and Society
(Session 1999-2000). (HMSO: London, 2000).
40. Wynne, B. in Society, Technology and Risk. (ed J.
Conrad) 167-202 (Academic Press: New York
1980).
41. Slovic, P. Perceived risk, trust and democracy,
Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675-682 (1993).
42. Flynn, J., Burns, W., Mertz, C.K. & Slovic, P. Trust
as a determinant of opposition to a high-level
radioactive waste repository: analysis of a