14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE<br />
Robert Mair (University of Cambridge)<br />
82<br />
In 2012, the Royal Society (RS) and the Royal Academy of<br />
Engineering (RAEng) published a joint report — Shale gas<br />
extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing 1 — that<br />
had been commissioned by the UK government.<br />
The report independently reviewed the scientific and<br />
engineering <strong>evidence</strong> associated with hydraulic fracturing<br />
(often termed ‘fracking’). The report addressed two key<br />
questions in connection with fracking: (i) what are the<br />
<strong>risk</strong>s of earthquakes? (ii) what are the environmental<br />
<strong>risk</strong>s, particularly in relation to possible groundwater<br />
contamination? It concluded that these <strong>risk</strong>s can be managed<br />
effectively in the United Kingdom so long as operational best<br />
practices are implemented and enforced through effective<br />
regulation. The report’s principal conclusions regarding these<br />
<strong>risk</strong>s can be summarized as follows.<br />
Fracking is unlikely to contaminate drinking water. The<br />
available <strong>evidence</strong> shows that fractures can be constrained<br />
within shale formations effectively. To reach overlying<br />
freshwater aquifers, the fractures in the shale would have to<br />
propagate upwards towards the surface for many hundreds<br />
of metres. The <strong>risk</strong> of this happening is very low, provided<br />
that fracking takes place at great depths (operations are<br />
typically at depths of several kilometres).<br />
But it is important not to conflate fracking itself with shalegas<br />
well operations. Groundwater contamination is much less<br />
likely to be due to the fracking process than to faulty well<br />
construction. The only realistic way that any contamination of<br />
groundwater may occur is if operations are poorly regulated<br />
and faulty wells are constructed as a result — consequently,<br />
the bigger <strong>risk</strong> to drinking water would be leakage from a<br />
faulty well. The report therefore recommended that well<br />
integrity should be a top priority if the <strong>risk</strong> of contamination<br />
is to be kept to an absolute minimum.<br />
All wells are lined with steel casing, which is sealed into<br />
the ground by cement. If wells are properly constructed,<br />
sealed and managed, the <strong>risk</strong> of contamination is very low.<br />
Also, the Environment Agency does not currently permit any<br />
hydraulic fracturing near freshwater aquifers based on a <strong>risk</strong><br />
assessment, taking into account the geology and depth at<br />
which fracking is proposed at the particular site.<br />
The other main potential causes of environmental<br />
contamination are poor site construction, or control<br />
measures at the surface that include treatment and disposal<br />
of wastewaters. However, any <strong>risk</strong>s can again be minimized<br />
by best practice and good regulation, which the United<br />
Kingdom has a good track record of upholding.<br />
The report also recommended that robust monitoring of<br />
groundwater should be conducted across the entire shale<br />
gas lifecycle: before, during and after operations. This is an<br />
important lesson to learn from the US shale gas experience:<br />
it has proved difficult to verify allegations of water<br />
contamination caused by fracking in the United States due to<br />
a lack of baseline monitoring.<br />
Earth tremors resulting from fracking are smaller than<br />
those caused by coal mining, and in this context ‘earth<br />
tremor’ is a much more appropriate term than ‘earthquake’.<br />
There are thousands of seismic events in the United<br />
Kingdom every year — those with a Richter magnitude<br />
of 1–2 are rarely felt. There are around 25 per year with<br />
magnitude 2 and about three per year at magnitude 3.<br />
Fracking can cause earth tremors, but these are likely to be<br />
small because shale is weaker than other rocks and yields<br />
before larger seismic events can occur.<br />
The United Kingdom has a history of induced seismicity<br />
from coal mining and the settlement of abandoned coal<br />
mines (up to magnitude 4). British Geological Survey records<br />
indicate that this mining-related seismicity is of smaller<br />
magnitude than natural seismicity; any seismicity induced<br />
by hydraulic fracturing is likely to be smaller still. To put<br />
fracking-related earth tremors in context, the two induced<br />
by hydraulic fracturing near Blackpool in 2011 had a Richter<br />
magnitude of 2.3 and 1.5. The RS/RAEng report concluded<br />
that these two minor earth tremors were due to the<br />
reactivation of a pre-stressed existing fault, and that it was<br />
very unlikely that future earth tremors caused by fracking<br />
would ever exceed magnitude 3 – and the effects felt would<br />
be no worse than a passing lorry. In other words, the <strong>risk</strong> of<br />
earth tremors of any real significance is very low.<br />
The RS/RAEng report concluded that UK fracking and<br />
shale gas extraction can be adequately controlled with its<br />
existing strong regulatory system, combined with 60 years’<br />
experience of regulating onshore and offshore oil and gas<br />
industries. Fracking is an established technology that has<br />
been used in the oil and gas industries for many decades, and<br />
the United Kingdom has considerable experience of fracking<br />
and horizontal drilling for non-shale gas applications. Over<br />
the past 30 years, more than 2,000 wells have been drilled<br />
onshore in the United Kingdom, approximately 200 of which<br />
have been fracked. There is nevertheless a need to ensure<br />
that the UK regulatory system is constantly reviewed and<br />
fit for purpose if shale gas extraction is to continue in this<br />
country with acceptably low <strong>risk</strong>s.<br />
Fracking can be done safely in the United Kingdom, but<br />
not without effective regulation, careful management, robust<br />
environmental <strong>risk</strong> assessments and rigorous monitoring. It<br />
is also essential to build public confidence: local communities<br />
need to be involved and well informed, and to feel that their<br />
concerns are being fully addressed.<br />
Fracking is unlikely to<br />
contaminate drinking water.