14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44<br />
Advances in the life sciences continue to deliver<br />
significant benefits to society across a broad spectrum<br />
of application areas, ranging from health products<br />
to sustainable materials. Rapidly advancing technologies and<br />
deepening understanding are now generating the potential to<br />
deliver increasingly effective and beneficial solutions, such as<br />
targeted diagnostics (including infection and disease monitors),<br />
personalised therapies, and speciality chemicals from a range of<br />
sustainable feedstocks. Synthesis — a mainstay of the chemical<br />
industry for nearly two centuries and currently enabling the<br />
production of tens of thousands of useful chemicals ranging<br />
from aspirin to Lycra — plays an increasingly important role<br />
in supporting these advances. For example, whereas insulin<br />
extracted from the pancreas of pigs was originally found to be<br />
an effective therapy for diabetes nearly a century ago, since the<br />
early 1980s the large-scale synthesis of genetically modified<br />
forms of insulin and its analogues now enables the delivery of<br />
more effective and affordable treatments.<br />
Synthetic biology represents a leading edge in our<br />
understanding of the relationship between molecular structure<br />
and function at the genomic level. This capacity stems from<br />
rapid developments since the beginning of the twenty-first<br />
century in high-throughput, low-cost data-analysis techniques<br />
such as DNA sequencing, combined with remarkable advances<br />
in computational power and data handling, and the field<br />
continues to assimilate new tools and techniques. This builds<br />
on more than forty years of complementary and contributory<br />
advances in the life sciences, with origins stemming back to<br />
the discovery of the structure of DNA in 1953. Introducing<br />
engineering design principles into the design–build–test cycle<br />
can also enhance the predictability and robustness of these<br />
<strong>innovation</strong>s, and accelerate the development of more bespoke<br />
and cost-effective solutions.<br />
Yet the commercialization of effective solutions depends not<br />
only on technological feasibility, but also on their affordability<br />
and their social acceptability. To ensure that intended benefits<br />
are delivered, it is important to recognize the existence and<br />
significance of a wide range of stakeholder interests, societal as<br />
well as technological, and to generate an environment in which<br />
relevant issues can be identified and addressed transparently<br />
and unambiguously. The UK government’s Synthetic Biology<br />
Leadership Council provides a multi-stakeholder forum in<br />
which such issues may be addressed.<br />
What exactly is synthetic biology?<br />
A clearly expressed and widely adopted technological<br />
definition of synthetic biology was outlined in the Royal<br />
Academy of Engineering report on synthetic biology 1 , and<br />
in the UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap 2 : “Synthetic Biology is<br />
the design and engineering of biologically-based parts, novel<br />
devices and systems as well as the redesign of existing, natural<br />
biological systems”. This highlights the key differentiator<br />
between synthetic biology and other fields: the application<br />
of systematic design through the implementation of the<br />
engineering principles of standardization, characterization<br />
and modularization. Adopting these principles allows for the<br />
application of systems theory, control theory, signal processing<br />
and a range of metrology techniques and standards. These<br />
themes are reiterated in the European Commission’s recent<br />
definition of synthetic biology 3 .<br />
However, it cannot be overlooked that other definitions<br />
exist and the term is sometimes applied more loosely, forming<br />
a potential source of ambiguity. This partly reflects the evolving<br />
nature of synthetic biology, the different interests and needs<br />
of stakeholders, and the various purposes to which the term<br />
is applied. Non-specialists may sometimes apply the term<br />
‘synthetic biology’ as a shorthand descriptor covering a broad<br />
range of leading edge bio-technological developments. But a<br />
technical specialist, funding agency or regulator may require<br />
a much sharper definition to be clear what is or is not being<br />
considered in a particular context. Such diversity of language<br />
is common to many technical fields and not peculiar to<br />
synthetic biology. It is not therefore a significant issue, as long<br />
as the purpose and context of any definition or description is<br />
understood. Here, we adopt the definition expressed above as<br />
representing the core characteristic of synthetic biology, and<br />
supplement this definition with a clarification of its scope as<br />
follows.<br />
A key goal of synthetic biology is to translate innovative<br />
concepts developed at a laboratory scale into potentially useful<br />
and commercializable options. This is not simply a matter<br />
of seeking uses for an emerging new technology. Market<br />
pull — the need to develop effective solutions to ongoing<br />
challenges — will often provide the inspiration and goal. These<br />
activities enable the identification of a product or service<br />
concept that will then have to be assessed against available<br />
marketplace alternatives before committing to full-scale<br />
commercial investment. Regulatory conformance is just one<br />
of a wide range of checks and balances that will determine<br />
whether a particular option ever reaches market. To scale<br />
up into a robust and viable market product or service, many<br />
other considerations ranging from process engineering and<br />
economics to customer value assessment may need to be<br />
taken into account. For example, pharmaceuticals will need<br />
to pass clinical trials, speciality chemicals will need to meet<br />
product performance specifications, and so on. In this context,<br />
synthetic biology may often serve as an innovative frontend<br />
to established market-facing sectors such as industrial<br />
biotechnology, agri-tech and healthcare, each sector being<br />
subject to its own specific, stringent regulatory frameworks<br />
and marketplace dynamics.<br />
Synthetic biology is essentially an enabling discipline. Meeting<br />
the underlying objective of introducing engineering design<br />
principles — by generating robust and reliable biological<br />
parts, devices and systems — directly focuses attention onto<br />
sources of uncertainty. Identifying and reducing those sources<br />
of uncertainty is key to increasing predictability. In its current<br />
early stage of development, this objective restricts synthetic<br />
biology to the incorporation of a limited number of parts at<br />
a time, but as we gain greater understanding of the complex<br />
interactions and internal control mechanisms that occur<br />
within biological systems, so the potential of the approach<br />
will expand. Historically, the redesign of biological systems has<br />
been a predominantly empirical ‘trial-and-error’ activity, but<br />
the ongoing establishment of relevant standards and metrology<br />
will facilitate the introduction of engineering-related design and