14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
14-1190b-innovation-managing-risk-evidence
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
When professional scientists, insurers and <strong>risk</strong><br />
assessors consider <strong>risk</strong>s, they typically weigh up<br />
the impact of an event against the probability<br />
of it occurring over a given timeframe. Car insurers, for<br />
example, think about how likely it is that your car will be<br />
stolen given its usage and location, and what the cost of<br />
replacing or repairing it might be. The UK’s National Security<br />
Strategy considers what the consequences of numerous<br />
plausible worst-case scenario events might be (an attack<br />
on UK overseas territories, for example, or severe coastal<br />
flooding), and then considers the likelihood that these<br />
events might occur.<br />
But this is not the way that most people calculate or<br />
assess <strong>risk</strong> most of the time. Indeed, experiments have<br />
shown that it’s not even how most experts assess <strong>risk</strong> most<br />
of the time. Human beings instead generally use rules of<br />
thumb (heuristics) that help them take quick, instinctive<br />
decisions. The vast majority of the time, these mental<br />
heuristics serve us remarkably well. But there are also<br />
occasions when these same heuristics result in us (in the<br />
language of economists) failing to ‘maximize our utility’.<br />
The systematic study of how people actually estimate<br />
probabilities and <strong>risk</strong>s has had major impacts in psychology,<br />
economics, and more recently, in policy. From the early<br />
1970s, the psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel<br />
Kahneman began publishing a series of detailed studies<br />
on how people — from the ‘man on the street’ to<br />
trained professionals — estimated everyday examples of<br />
probabilities, frequencies and associations. Tversky and<br />
Kahneman were especially interested in those situations in<br />
which people fail to behave like professional <strong>risk</strong> assessors,<br />
and they gradually uncovered the nature of the mental<br />
shortcuts that people were using, and documented the<br />
circumstances under which these would lead to error.<br />
For example, Tversky and Kahneman found that people<br />
often estimate the probability of an event occurring by how<br />
easily they can recall or generate examples of it occurring.<br />
Try it yourself. Do you think that there are more English<br />
words that start with the letter ‘r’ or that have ‘r’ as the<br />
third letter?<br />
What you probably did, almost immediately, is to start<br />
thinking about examples of words that started with the<br />
letter ‘r’, which you’ll find that you can do quite easily. You<br />
also will have tried to think of words that have ‘r’ as a third<br />
88<br />
CASE STUDY<br />
SOCIAL MACHINES: MANAGING RISK IN A WEB-ENABLED WORLD<br />
Nigel Shadbolt (University of Southampton)<br />
The Kenyan election on 27 December 2007 was<br />
followed by a wave of riots, killings and turmoil.<br />
An African blogger, Erik Hersman, read a post<br />
by another blogger, Ory Okolloh, calling for a Web<br />
application to track incidents of violence and areas<br />
of need. Within a few days, Hersman had organized<br />
Okolloh and two like-minded developers in the United<br />
States and Kenya to make the idea a reality. The result<br />
was Ushahidi, which allowed local observers to submit<br />
reports using the Web or SMS messages from mobile<br />
phones, and simultaneously created a temporal and<br />
geospatial archive of these events. It has subsequently<br />
been extended, adapted and used around the world in<br />
events from Washington DC’s ‘Snowmageddon’ in 2010,<br />
to the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan in 2011.<br />
How did this happen?<br />
On 12 January 2010, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake<br />
devastated the capital of Haiti. As the world rushed to<br />
help, relief agencies realized that they had a problem:<br />
there were no detailed maps of Port-au-Prince. Too<br />
poor to afford a mapping agency, the country had<br />
never built this vital piece of digital infrastructure.<br />
Two weeks later, using tools such as WikiProject and<br />
OpenStreetMaps together with data from widelyavailable<br />
GPS devices, relief workers, government<br />
officials and ordinary citizens had access to detailed<br />
maps of the entire capital. How did this happen?<br />
As of July 20<strong>14</strong>, seven projects had contributed hundreds<br />
of millions of classifications to the citizen science astronomy<br />
website Galaxy Zoo. Beginning in 2007, astronomers at the<br />
University of Oxford had built a site that enabled people<br />
to quickly learn the task of classifying images of galaxies.<br />
The first project comprised a data set made up of a million<br />
galaxies imaged by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey — far<br />
more images than the handful of professional astronomers<br />
could deal with. Within 24 hours of launch, the site was<br />
achieving 70,000 classifications an hour. More than 50 million<br />
classifications were received by the project during its first<br />
year, contributed by more than 150,000 people and resulting<br />
in many scientific insights. How does this happen?<br />
The answer lies in emergent and collective problem<br />
solving — the creation of ‘social machines’ that integrate<br />
humans, machines and data at a large scale. In the case of<br />
Galaxy Zoo, researchers had built the world’s most powerful<br />
pattern-recognition super-computer. As one of the cofounders<br />
noted: “it existed in the linked intelligence of all the<br />
people who had logged on to our website: and this global<br />
brain was… incredibly fast and incredibly accurate”.<br />
The essential characteristics of all of these examples<br />
are:<br />
• Problems are solved by the scale of human participation<br />
and open <strong>innovation</strong> on the World Wide Web.<br />
• They rely on access to (or else the ability to generate)