23.05.2015 Views

Space Link Extension - Service Management - CCSDS

Space Link Extension - Service Management - CCSDS

Space Link Extension - Service Management - CCSDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DRAFT RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR SPACE LINK EXTENSION SERVICE MANAGEMENT<br />

ANNEX B<br />

INCREMENTAL ADOPTION<br />

(NORMATIVE)<br />

This Recommended Standard recognizes that an installed base of service management<br />

information and interfaces for SLE-SM exists. Therefore, the Recommended Standard<br />

allows for incremental adoption and deployment towards standardized SLE-SM.<br />

Table B-1 identifies the minimum set of operations that need to be implemented to be SLE-<br />

SM compliant.<br />

If an implementation is not fully compliant with the Recommended Standard, it is said to be<br />

bilateral, which means that a particular UM and CM have agreed to accommodate variations<br />

from the Recommended Standard. An implementation may be bilateral in the definition of<br />

the content of the management information, or in the mechanisms used to exchange (e.g.,<br />

create, delete, query) the information. If the table indicates that bilaterally defined exchange<br />

is allowed for a particular type of management information, an implementation is not<br />

required to use the SLE-SM service defined for that information.<br />

An implementation may be compliant in one aspect and bilateral in another. For example, for<br />

Configuration Profile operations, the message contents may be compliant, but the procedure<br />

for transferring the data between UM and CM may be outside the SLE-SM Recommended<br />

Standard. This case is an example of ‘bilaterally defined exchange allowed’.<br />

An example of ‘bilaterally defined content allowed’ is the case where a network provides<br />

services that are not completely in conformance with all of the <strong>CCSDS</strong> standards upon which<br />

the standard Carrier Profiles are based, e.g., because a non-<strong>CCSDS</strong>-standard modulation<br />

scheme is used. In such a case, an appropriate (bilaterally defined) carrier profile format<br />

might be developed and agreed to by UM and CM, but could be exchanged via the standard<br />

ASLSP and QSLSP operations. Thus space link service providers that support both <strong>CCSDS</strong><br />

and non-<strong>CCSDS</strong>-conformant spacecraft can use the common SLE-SM service infrastructure<br />

to support both sets of clients.<br />

<strong>CCSDS</strong> 910.11-R-2 Page B-1 March 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!