17.11.2012 Views

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

performed his ablution. He said, ‘Our ghusl is acceptable<br />

according to the Shâfi’î madhhab. It was declared in a hadîth<br />

that when something foul gets mixed with water that amounts to<br />

a qullatayn, it is not foul unless one of its three peculiarities is<br />

changed.’ A qullatayn is two hundred and twenty kilograms of<br />

water. The book al-Barîqa, explaining this point, says that it is<br />

permissible to imitate another madhhab when necessity for it<br />

arises. The book Durr-ul Mukhtâr says at the end of its chapter<br />

on ‘Prayer Times,’ “When there is darûrat (compulsion, strict<br />

necessity), another madhhab is imitated.” While explaining this,<br />

the book Ibni Âbidîn says, “One of the two inferences (qaul) is<br />

written here. According to the second inference (qaul), when<br />

there is harâj, hardship, one of the other three madhhabs is<br />

imitated, no matter whether there is darûrat or not. This is the<br />

preferrable inference. When there is difficulty in doing<br />

something, if your own madhhab shows a way of making it<br />

easy, or if it is excused, there will be no need to imitate any<br />

other madhhab. Quoting from the book Husn-ut-tanabbuh Fittashabbuh,<br />

it is writen in the two hundred and eleventh page of<br />

the book Hadîqa: “When someone’s nafs does not want to do<br />

what is easy, then it is useful for him to act according to a<br />

rukhsat by leaving the azîmats (difficulties). But this should not<br />

lead one to search for rukhsats because collecting the easier<br />

parts of madhhabs, which is called Talfiq, is harâm and an act<br />

of obeying the nafs and shaytân (satan).”]<br />

If disbelievers themselves were foul, necessarily they<br />

wouldn’t be clean after accepting îmân. Then, calling them foul<br />

is intended to declare that their hearts are foul. When they<br />

accept îmân, this foulness dissappears and they become clean.<br />

That their beliefs and their hearts are foul does not mean that<br />

their bodies are foul. These âyats declare that disbelievers are<br />

foul. These facts do not change. Changes can be made in<br />

commands and prohibitions. Changes cannot be made in the<br />

fact of how something is. [The book Hadîqa, in explaining the<br />

disasters incurred by the tongues says, “Allahu ta’âlâ has made<br />

alternations, changes in twenty âyats that communicate His<br />

commandments and prohibitions.” He has not made any<br />

alterations in qisas (facts about ancient people) and facts.]<br />

Since facts do not change, disbelievers must be always foul.<br />

This is the foulness of disbelief and of creed. Thus, the<br />

interpretation made will be compatible with the original<br />

- 105 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!