17.11.2012 Views

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

our Prophet used to call an Arabian villager and his uncle Abû<br />

Tâlib and also Abû Lahab and Abbâs, father. It has been a<br />

custom in every nation, in every language, in every age to use<br />

the word ‘father’ for uncle, for step-father, for father-in-law, and<br />

also for any protecting or helping a person. Besides, Âzar was<br />

both the uncle and step-father of Hadrat Ibrâhîm. Also<br />

Fîrûzâbâdî confirms this fact in Qâmûs by saying, “Âzar is the<br />

name of Hadrat Ibrâhîm’s ‘alaihis-salâm’ uncle. His father’s<br />

name is Târuh.” The statement, “The unanimity that Âzar is the<br />

uncle is unsound. According to the sound unanimity, Âzar is his<br />

father,” is an unsound and worthless claim against such a clear<br />

declaration in religious books. It results from misunderstanding<br />

the subtlety in the words of savants.<br />

It cannot be a document for the interpretation by Baydâwî to<br />

give the seventy-fourth âyat in Sûrat-ul-An’âm its plain meaning<br />

instead of interpreting it, [and that this âyat-i karîma and the<br />

hundred and fifteenth âyat of Sûrat-ut-Tawba were explained<br />

away with an improper ta’wîl in the commentary Rûh al-bayân.]<br />

Nor can it abrogate the unanimity among the savants of<br />

interpretation, the savants of hadîth, the savants of kelâm, and<br />

the Sôfiyya-i aliyya. For it is only Muhammad (alayhissalâm)<br />

who has given the Qur’ân al-kerîm its correct meaning and<br />

who has intrepreted it correctly through his hadîth-i-sherîfs.<br />

None of the Ashâb-i kirâm or Tâbi’în-i ’Izâm thought of Âzar as<br />

the father when they heard this âyat-i-kerîma, nor did any of<br />

them say so. They understood that he was his uncle. This is the<br />

belief of the Ahl-i sunnat.<br />

It is written at the end of Fatâwâ-i Khayriyya, “It is written in<br />

Qâmûs that Âzar is the name of Hadrat Ibrâhîm’s uncle. His<br />

father’s name is Târuh. It is written as Ibrâhîm bin Târûh in<br />

Târîh-i Hanbalî. It says that Âzar is the nickname of Târûh. In<br />

The Interpretation of Jalâlayn it is written that the name Âzar<br />

in the âyat is Târûh’s last name. Ibni Hâjar writes in his revision<br />

of Hamziyya: ‘Âzar was a disbeliever. It is declared in the<br />

Qur’ân that he was Hadrat Ibrâhîm’s ‘alaihis-salâm’ father. The<br />

ummats with holy books say that Âzar was not Hadrat Ibrâhîm’s<br />

‘alaihis-salâm’ own father, but he was his uncle, for the Arabs<br />

call the uncle father. So the uncle has been called father in the<br />

Qur’ân. It has been declared, ‘The creator [Allah] of your<br />

father Ibrâhîm and Ismâ’il’ about Hadrat Ya’qûb. Nonetheless,<br />

Hadrat Ismâ’îl was Hadrat Ya’qûb’s uncle, not his father. When<br />

- 253 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!