17.11.2012 Views

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

necessary to do that thing. They would either remain silent or<br />

say the opposite. Thus, they would dissent from the religion and<br />

drive the Muslims into sins or disbelief. During the times such<br />

as when the armies of Genghis invaded Muslims’ lands, or<br />

during the times of the Fâtimîds and the Rasûlîds, and even<br />

during the time of the Abbâsids, such government officers<br />

called muftîs said “permissible” about the harâm (forbidden).<br />

They even said that the Qur’ân was a creature. During the<br />

times when those officials caused the religion to be demolished<br />

by writing made-up fatwâs, those who remained loyal to the<br />

books of fiqh and to the books teaching the truth about the<br />

religion remained on the right way. They thus were able to save<br />

their faith.<br />

Fatwâ means to communicate if something conforms or not<br />

with the Sharî’at. It is not a fatwâ only to say, “It conforms,” or,<br />

“It is not permissible.” It is necessary also to say from which<br />

book of fiqh and from which writing this answer has been<br />

derived. The fatwâs that are not conformable with books of fiqh<br />

are wrong. It is not permissible to depend on them. Those who<br />

read âyats and hadîths without learning or knowing Islâmic<br />

knowledge and who give them meanings according to their own<br />

minds and opinions are not called Islâmic savants. They can be<br />

translators with a knowledge of Arabic like the priests in Beirut.<br />

No matter how ornamented and bright their writings and words<br />

are, they are worth nothing. Allahu ta’âlâ does not like or accept<br />

the writings and words that are not conformable with what the<br />

Ahl-i sunnat savants understood or with the books of fiqh which<br />

they wrote.<br />

Ibni Âbidin, while describing Qâdis (judges), says on the<br />

three hundred and first page of the fourth volume, “It is not<br />

suitable for a sinner to become the muftî because it is a<br />

religious matter to give a fatwâ. The sinner’s words cannot be<br />

accepted in religious affairs. The case is the same according to<br />

the other madhhabs. It is not permissible to ask such muftîs<br />

about anything. Also, according to the unanimity (of savants), it<br />

is an essential condition that the muftî must be a Muslim and<br />

sane. The fatwâ of a just and pious lady or of someone dumb<br />

(unable to speak) person is acceptable. The muftî or the judge<br />

should give a fatwâ according to the words of Imâm-i a’zâm<br />

Abû Hanîfa. It he does not find it clearly in his words, he should<br />

take Imâm-i Shaybânî’s words. After him, he should prefer<br />

- 209 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!