1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık
1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık
1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The priest – He is a god because he used to enliven the<br />
dead, cure the congenital blind, and heal the itchy white specks<br />
on the skin, which are called leprosy. These kinds of things can<br />
be done by God only.<br />
Fahreddîn Râzî – If there is no proof, no sign to<br />
demonstrate the existence of something, can that thing be said<br />
to be non-existing? If you say that it can be said, and that it<br />
does not exist, you will have denied the existence of a Creator<br />
when you say that there was nothing eternally before. In this<br />
case your words will be nonsensical. It is because all creatures<br />
are proofs and signs which demonstrate the existence of Allâhu<br />
ta’âlâ.<br />
If you say that the thing inferred through a proof may exist<br />
even if there is no proof, in this case, you will have accepted the<br />
existence of a Creator when there was nothing in the past<br />
eternity. If you say that when Jesus was nonexistent in the past<br />
eternity God penetrated into him, in this case, your claim will be<br />
something accepted without a proof. It is because Jesus was<br />
created later on. His existing in the past eternity means there is<br />
no proof. While you acccept, without proof, that God entered<br />
Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm), how do you know that He has not<br />
entered me, you, animals or even plants and stones? Why do<br />
not you accept, without proof, that these also may be<br />
penetrated?<br />
Priest – The reason why He entered Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm),<br />
and did not enter you, me, or others, is clear. It is because he<br />
performed mu’jizas. No unusual things were performed by you,<br />
me, or others. Hence, it is understood that God penetrated into<br />
Jesus, but not any others.<br />
Fahreddîn Râzî – You show his mu’jizas as a proof to claim<br />
that God entered him. How can you claim that unless we<br />
perform a mu’jiza God cannot enter? It is impossible for you to<br />
claim that God does not penetrate into you, me and others<br />
since we and they have not done unusual things. It is because<br />
we have already agreed with you that there is no need to prove<br />
the existence of the thing inferred. Hence, having been<br />
penetrated does not require one to perform mu’jizas, that is,<br />
unusual, extraordinary things. Then, you have to believe that<br />
God has entered me, you, the cat, the dog, and the rat. Then is<br />
it possible for a religion to be true that causes us to believe that<br />
God has entered these low creatures?<br />
- 219 -