17.11.2012 Views

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“When he told his father Âzer.” If he were his own father, the<br />

word ‘his father’ would be superfluous.<br />

All of the scholars of the Taurât (Torah) followed the religion<br />

of Mûsâ (’alaihi’s-salâm) for a 1800 year period and along with<br />

them the Apostles of Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm) and the priests who<br />

followed them said that Âzar was not the real father but that he<br />

was the uncle of Ibrâhîm (’alaihi’s-salâm). As it is inferred from<br />

the undefiled old namescripts of the Torah and the Bible, the<br />

name of the father of Ibrâhîm (’alaihi’s-salâm) was Târuh. The<br />

word Târuh is not the Hebrew synonym of Âzar as some<br />

ignorant people write. It means that they both are not names for<br />

the same person. There are many verses in the Qur’ân-al karîm<br />

in accord with those in the Torah and the Bible. In the thirtieth<br />

page of the Turkish version of his book, Bayân-ul-haq,<br />

Rahmatullah Efendi (rahmat-Allahî ’alaih), one of the Islâmic<br />

scholars of India, says, “Naskh; i.e., anything to be made invalid<br />

by Allahu ta’âlâ, involves only the commandments and the<br />

prohibitions. In the commentary Ma’âlim-ut-tanzîl al-Imâm al-<br />

Baghawî says that Naskh did not occur in the qisas (narrations)<br />

and akhbâr (information) [nor scientific and experimental<br />

knowledge] but only in the commandments and prohibitions.<br />

Naskh does not mean to change them but to inform as to the<br />

ending of their period of validity. The Qur’ân-i karîm did not<br />

invalidate the whole Torah and Bible but a part of them.” [There<br />

is some information about Naskh in this fascicle in a letter by<br />

Imâm-i Rabbanî, Vol. 3-22]. Therefore, the ta’wîl (explaining<br />

away) of the above-mentioned âyat-i karîma becomes<br />

necessary.<br />

Allahu ta’âlâ declares in the hundred and thirty-third âyat of<br />

the Sûrat-ul-Baqara that Hadrat Ya’qûb’s (Jacob’s) sons said to<br />

him, “And the creator of your fathers Ibrâhîm, Ismâ’il and<br />

Ishaq....” This may come to mean that hadrat Ismâ’il is the<br />

father of Hadrat Ya’qûb. However, Hadrat Ya’qûb is the son of<br />

Hadrat Ishaq ‘alaihis-salâm’, who is the son of Hadrat Ibrâhîm<br />

‘alaihis-salâm’. And Hadrat Ishaq ‘alaihis-salâm’ is Hadrat<br />

Ismâ’il’s ‘alaihis-salâm’ brother. Then, Hadrat Ismâ’il ‘alaihissalâm’<br />

is not Hadrat Ya’kûb’s ‘alaihis-salâm’ father but his<br />

uncle. This means to say that in the Qur’ân al-kerîm ‘uncle’<br />

means ‘father.’ It is written in the interpretation of this âyat in<br />

many books of interpretation that the word ‘father’ is used for<br />

uncle in various Arabic lexicons. It is written in many books that<br />

- 252 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!