1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık
1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık
1 - Endless Bliss - Hüseyin Hilmi Işık
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1- You claim that Jesus was a physical god who could be<br />
seen with the eyes. Saying that the God of creatures is Jesus<br />
(’alaihi’s-salâm), who was a human and a physical body, would<br />
mean that, when he was killed by the Jews, the God of<br />
creatures was killed. In this case, there would be no God for<br />
creatures in the end. Nonetheless, it is impossible for creatures<br />
not to have a God. Moreover, is it possible for someone to be<br />
unjustly caught and killed by the Jews and at the same time to<br />
be the God of creatures?<br />
It has been commonly known that Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm)<br />
used to worship Allâhu ta’âlâ profusely and was fond of ta’ât<br />
(obedience). If Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm) had been God, he would<br />
not have worshipped, nor been fond of ta’ât. It is never possible<br />
for God to worship himself. [On the contrary, he is worshipped<br />
by others. So, it is understood that the words of the priest are<br />
nonsensical.]<br />
2- You claim that God penetrated into him, and he is the son<br />
of God. This belief is wrong because God cannot be a<br />
substance or araz (attribute). It is impossible for God to<br />
penetrate into a substance. If God were a substance, He could<br />
penetrate another substance. If something penetrates into a<br />
substance it must be a substance, too, and after penetration,<br />
two substances will be mixed together. This requires God to be<br />
divided into pieces. If God were an araz (attribute), He would<br />
need a locality, a residence. And again, this would mean that<br />
God needed something else. Someone who needs something<br />
else cannot be God. [What was the reason for God penetrating<br />
into Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm)? Penetration without a reason is<br />
‘tarjîhun bilâ murajjeh.’ We have already proven that this is<br />
nonsense, and we have explained this fact in our book Could<br />
Not Answer, where we have also proven that Allâhu ta’âlâ is<br />
one.]<br />
3- You say he is not God, but some part of God penetrated<br />
and settled into him. In this case, if the part that entered him is<br />
effective enough to make Him God, when the part left God, He<br />
would be incomplete in being God. If the part is not effective<br />
enough to become a God, this part cannot be deemed to be a<br />
part of God.<br />
What is your proof to claim that Jesus (’alaihi’s-salâm) was<br />
God?<br />
- 218 -