W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8villages in Aguié District, where inhabitants could harvest regeneratedtrees for food, fodder, and firewood to sell in exchange forgrain (see box) did not rely on famine relief and avoided a singledeath (Tougiani et al. 2008:13). The contrast between <strong>the</strong>famine’s impacts on FMNR farmers and on <strong>the</strong>ir neighbors whodid not practice FMNR is a stark reminder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> persistencerequired to scale up even visibly beneficial and simple changes toentrenched customs. Indeed, despite all its successes, at least half<strong>of</strong> Niger’s farmers still do not use FMNR (Tappan 2007).Women Reap DividendsWomen are perhaps <strong>the</strong> biggest winners in Niger’s tree regenerationrevolution. Traditionally excluded from resourcemanagement decisions (despite being skilled in farming andanimal husbandry), <strong>the</strong>y have pr<strong>of</strong>ited from <strong>the</strong> simple realitythat FMNR favors women producers (Tougiani et al. 2008:12).Getting <strong>the</strong> best results from revegetation requires year-round,152DAN SAGA: PEOPLE POWER TRANSFORMS LOCAL ECONOMYThe Maradi village <strong>of</strong> Dan Saga and its neighbors are <strong>the</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> aconcerted effort to build social capacity while promoting natural resourcemanagement in Niger. Beset by chronic food shortages due to a lack <strong>of</strong>land to sustain its rapidly growing population, Dan Saga was chosenas a priority site by <strong>the</strong> Aguié District Rural Development Project, aninitiative launched in 1992 by <strong>the</strong> International Fund for AgriculturalDevelopment (Boubacar 2006:17). The project provided rural credit toseveral dozen villages and actively promoted farmer-led tree regeneration.Initially it did so using top-down demonstration and instruction t<strong>of</strong>armers. But <strong>the</strong>se early efforts were undermined by conflicts amongvillagers, as some people were stealing wood from trees grown by o<strong>the</strong>rs(Boubacar 2006:17–19).In 2001, project managers switched focus to empowering communitiesthrough capacity-building. Under <strong>the</strong> renamed Desert CommunityInitiative, village management committees for natural regeneration wereelected by all community members. In a major break with tradition, <strong>the</strong>seincluded women farmers and herders—two normally marginalizedgroups—as well as male landowners. The committees laid down strictrules to regulate <strong>the</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> trees, organized villagers to guardfields against intruders, and imposed fines on those who broke community-approvedregulations (Reij 2004; Tougiani et al. 2008:12).Resource management decisions and action plans were made at monthlyvillage assemblies, held before local elders and <strong>the</strong> chief, at whichcommittee members fed back information to <strong>the</strong> community. New bylaws,agreed to by <strong>the</strong> local administrative authority, embedded <strong>the</strong>se arrangements,while elected committee members were equipped with a uniformand badge, emphasizing <strong>the</strong>ir authority. Aguié’s departmental government,forestry department, and land tenure commission also approved <strong>the</strong>new institutional arrangements (Tougiani et al. 2008:10–14).Their investment thus protected, many more farmers began nurturingbush trees, adopting pruning and trimming techniques that allowed fastvertical growth without hindering <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> millet in <strong>the</strong> soil below(Toumieux 2005). By 2007, a total <strong>of</strong> 53 FMNR community committeeshad been established, covering 170 villages and encompassing <strong>the</strong> entireAguié district (Tougiani et al. 2008:11). Each village made paymentstoward policing tree regeneration activities. The income raised, toge<strong>the</strong>rwith fines collected, was placed in a village fund and used to supportdevelopment activities and tree nurseries on common land. This transparentprocess both enhanced social unity and reinforced public supportfor tree regeneration (Tougiani et al. 2008:12–13).By 2007, destructive tree cutting practices had “practically ceased in<strong>the</strong> whole <strong>of</strong> Aguié,” and 130,000 ha across <strong>the</strong> district boasted regeneratingtrees (Tougiani et al. 2008:14). In Dan Saga, this included everyhousehold and more than 5,600 ha <strong>of</strong> land, transforming <strong>the</strong> localeconomy (Abdoulaye and Ibro 2006:15). Fields that had previously lainbarren contained on average 150 bush trees per ha, compared with only52 per ha in a nearby non-project village (Abdoulaye and Ibro 2006:36).Villagers reported that FMNR can double <strong>the</strong>ir yields (Diarra 2006:18),and some40 percent <strong>of</strong> village producers were selling surplus wood, seedpods fromgao trees, and fruits and gum Arabic from Acacia seyal trees (Abdoulayeand Ibro 2006:43). Annual per capita income from wood sales aloneranged between US$46 and US$92 (Tougiani et al. 2008: 13).Food security and resilience to drought—critical issues for a village on<strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sahara—have also improved markedly (Tougiani et al.2008:2). In 2005, when a deadly combination <strong>of</strong> locusts and droughtstruck <strong>the</strong> region, Dan Saga required no food aid (Toumieux 2005).
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E R Teven daily, attention to pruning trees. As most men still migrateto urban centers throughout West Africa during <strong>the</strong> dry seasonto secure additional cash income, <strong>the</strong> increasingly valued task<strong>of</strong> tree husbandry <strong>of</strong>ten falls to women (Wentling 2008a).Women and <strong>the</strong>ir families derive a host <strong>of</strong> material benefitsfrom this role. Using <strong>the</strong>ir own wood for cooking eliminates adaily cost <strong>of</strong> 200 CFA francs (US 40 cents) for purchasedfirewood (USAID et al. 2005:18). Surplus wood can earn up to400 CFA francs (US 80 cents) per bundle in local marketsKOLLOMA BABA:WOMEN REVIVE LAND, IMPROVE THEIR STATUS“These lands are now like our husbands,” say <strong>the</strong> women <strong>of</strong> KollomaBaba, describing <strong>the</strong> thriving plots <strong>of</strong> millet and sorghum, cow peas,groundnut, and okra around <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> hard labor(Abdoulaye and Ibro 2006:40, 42). Once barren, boulder-covered, anddevoid <strong>of</strong> vegetation, <strong>the</strong>se patches <strong>of</strong> reclaimed desert have lifted <strong>the</strong>women, mostly divorcees and widows, out <strong>of</strong> grinding poverty andtransformed <strong>the</strong>ir social status. Today, not only do <strong>the</strong>y harvest enoughfood for <strong>the</strong>ir families; <strong>the</strong>y earn income from selling surplus crops, hay,and tree seedpods, and <strong>the</strong>ir land has significantly increased in value(Boubacar et al. 2005:17, 20; Diarra 2006:21).The women’s fortunes were transformed with <strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> TahouaRural Development Project, funded by <strong>the</strong> German government agencyGTZ. In <strong>the</strong> late 1980s, with <strong>the</strong> agreement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> village chief and localgovernment <strong>of</strong>ficials, about 250 widows and divorced women received<strong>the</strong> rights to abandoned, degraded land in Kolloma Baba, a villagewhere farm productivity had plunged by up to 90 percent (PDRT 1997as cited by Guéro and Dan Lamso 2006:5; Abdoulaye and Ibro 2006:40).In return <strong>the</strong> women pledged to restore <strong>the</strong> land by investing <strong>the</strong>ir laborin soil and water conservation techniques (Guéro and Dan Lamso2006:29; Winterbottom 2008).After clearing <strong>the</strong> land <strong>of</strong> rock, each woman received a plot <strong>of</strong> about60 square meters (BBC 2006). In addition to sowing traditional milletand sorghum, many took <strong>the</strong> initiative to diversify into cow peas,groundnut, and okra (Abdoulaye and Ibro 2006:32). In <strong>the</strong> early years,female farmers worked through <strong>the</strong> Kolloma Baba Women’s Association,established by <strong>the</strong> project, with members helping each o<strong>the</strong>r to develop<strong>the</strong>ir land (BBC 2006). More recently, <strong>the</strong>y have hired male labor, pro<strong>of</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir considerable economic capacity (Boubacar et al. 2005:18, 29).By 2006, <strong>the</strong>y had restored 2,000 ha <strong>of</strong> degraded land and were sellingexcess crops, lifting <strong>the</strong>mselves a step out <strong>of</strong> poverty and increasing<strong>the</strong>ir social status. A village committee, principally made up <strong>of</strong> women,deals with protection <strong>of</strong> regenerated trees across <strong>the</strong> community(Saadou and Larwanou 2006:15–16, 18).Although <strong>the</strong>ir land has increased several times in value, and despitepersistent pressure from male farmers, <strong>the</strong> women have vowed not tosell. Says association member Fatima Illiassou: “Thanks to our crops,we can eat. We can buy clo<strong>the</strong>s for our children. We won’t go throughall that suffering to give men <strong>the</strong> fruits <strong>of</strong> our labor” (BBC 2006).during <strong>the</strong> dry season; in Zinder, a sack <strong>of</strong> nutritious, ediblebaobab leaves can sell for as much as 3,000 CFA francs(US$6), three times <strong>the</strong> average daily wage for laborers(Larwanou et al. 2006:18). Women farmers use FMNRincome to meet household needs, including purchasing foodand paying school fees. Many have also diversified <strong>the</strong>ir households’livelihoods: some by taking advantage <strong>of</strong> better soilfertility and water retention to cultivate cash crops such asonions, tomatoes, sesame, and hibiscus; o<strong>the</strong>rs by using <strong>the</strong>irnew earnings to invest in sheep and goats, which live <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong>tree seedpods (BBC 2006; Reij 2006:iii).Anecdotal evidence highlights how <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> womenhas been transformed by <strong>the</strong>ir involvement in FMNR. A 2006field study <strong>of</strong> FMNR villages across Zinder region found thatlivestock owners—ranked high on <strong>the</strong> social ladder—commonly included women (Larwanou et al. 2006:21). InKolloma Baba village in Tahoua, formerly vulnerable andmarginalized widows and divorcees employ male laborers towork <strong>the</strong>ir farms (Boubacar et al. 2005:10, 16). During <strong>the</strong>2005 food crisis, female FMNR farmers also used <strong>the</strong>ir foodreserves to assist o<strong>the</strong>rs, elevating <strong>the</strong>ir position in <strong>the</strong>community (Diarra 2006:12). Women farmers’ enhancedstatus is also clearly demonstrated in FMNR communitiesthat boast village natural resource management committees,where <strong>the</strong>y participate equally with men in decision-making(Tougiani et al. 2008:12).Re-greening a Country:Key Players and PartnersWith millions <strong>of</strong> trees now carpeting land that was mostly barrenonly one to two decades ago, Niger’s farmers have producedone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most visibly successful examples <strong>of</strong> natural resourcemanagement in <strong>the</strong> world today. Although it took several yearsto take <strong>of</strong>f, Niger’s farmers have abandoned a core practice <strong>of</strong>clearing fields and have embraced <strong>the</strong> protection and sustainablemanagement <strong>of</strong> native vegetation.Why did <strong>the</strong>y do so? One clear reason, say observers, was<strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> environmental and economic crisis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late1970s and early 1980s, combined with Niger’s boomingpopulation. With more mouths to feed every year, ruralcommunities could see that traditional clearing and farmingmethods were no longer meeting <strong>the</strong>ir needs (Wentling 2008a).The obvious success <strong>of</strong> early FMNR projects, implemented atlittle or no cost to farmers, was also a powerful spur to <strong>the</strong>irneighbors. But it is unlikely <strong>the</strong> movement would have reachedsuch a scale or overcome <strong>the</strong> barriers to farmer adoptionwithout <strong>the</strong> input <strong>of</strong> two key players: Niger’s central governmentand international intermediary organizations.153
- Page 1 and 2:
2008WORLDRESOURCESRoots ofResilienc
- Page 3:
WORLDRESOURCES2008
- Page 6 and 7:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 10 and 11:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 12 and 13:
Roots ofResilie
- Page 14 and 15:
Scaling up nature-based enterprises
- Page 16 and 17:
Examples of such economic and socia
- Page 18 and 19:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 20 and 21:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 22 and 23:
BOX 1.2 WHAT IS SCALING UP?10In gen
- Page 24:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 27 and 28:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 29 and 30:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 31 and 32:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 33 and 34:
PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION LIVING UND
- Page 36 and 37:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 38 and 39:
Investing in the social capital of
- Page 40 and 41:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 42 and 43:
UPDATE: SCALING UP NAMIBIA’SCOMMU
- Page 44 and 45:
UPDATE: NAMIBIAincluding a limited
- Page 46 and 47:
UPDATE: NAMIBIAGROWTH IN COMMUNAL C
- Page 48 and 49:
UPDATE: NAMIBIATorra Conservancy su
- Page 50 and 51:
UPDATE: SCALING UP LOCAL MANAGEMENT
- Page 52 and 53:
UPDATE: FIJIextensively with the co
- Page 54 and 55:
UPDATE: FIJI42of the iqoliqoli comm
- Page 56 and 57:
UPDATE: FIJI2007a:iv). A separate s
- Page 58 and 59:
Scaling up environmental enterprise
- Page 60 and 61:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 62 and 63:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 64 and 65:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 66 and 67:
OWNERSHIP54W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 68 and 69:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 70 and 71:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 72 and 73:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 74 and 75:
OWNERSHIP62W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 76 and 77:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 78 and 79:
OWNERSHIP66give marginalized groups
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 2.2 LESSONS FROM THE FIELD:GENE
- Page 82 and 83:
Box 2.2 LESSONS FROM THE FIELD70It
- Page 84 and 85:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 86 and 87:
Box 2.3 WOMEN ON THE MOVE: SCALING
- Page 88 and 89:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 90 and 91:
BOX 2.4 WATERSHED ORGANISATION TRUS
- Page 92 and 93:
CAPACITY80W O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 94 and 95:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 96 and 97:
BOX 2.5LOCAL EMPOWERMENT, UPWARD IN
- Page 98 and 99:
CAPACITY86W O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 100 and 101:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 102 and 103:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 104 and 105:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 106 and 107:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 108 and 109:
CONNECTION96W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 110 and 111:
BOX 2.6CURING POVERTY?TAKING ADVANT
- Page 112 and 113:
BOX 2.7 ETHIOPIAN COFFEE COOPERATIV
- Page 114 and 115: BOX 2.7 ETHIOPIAN COFFEE COOPERATIV
- Page 116 and 117: CONNECTIONW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 118 and 119: CONNECTION106W O R L D R E S O U R
- Page 121 and 122: B U I L D I N G O W N E R S H I P,
- Page 123 and 124: ROUTESTORESILIENCEIN THIS REPORT WE
- Page 125 and 126: F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 127 and 128: Creating Institutions, Empowering C
- Page 129 and 130: F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 131 and 132: F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 133 and 134: F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 135 and 136: F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 137 and 138: F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 139 and 140: G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D Sregio
- Page 141 and 142: G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SThe C
- Page 143 and 144: Intermediaries Help Build Necessary
- Page 145 and 146: G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SENTER
- Page 147 and 148: G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D Sit to
- Page 149 and 150: Chemonics and IRG 2000:A-V-2). Hist
- Page 151 and 152: G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SLEARN
- Page 153 and 154: G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SAcros
- Page 155 and 156: T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 157 and 158: T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 159 and 160: T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 161 and 162: Demi-lunesAdding Value: Reclaiming
- Page 163: Storing milletNationally, figures f
- Page 167 and 168: T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 169 and 170: T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 171 and 172: DRIVINGTHESCALINGPROCESSC H A P T E
- Page 173 and 174: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 175 and 176: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 177 and 178: The Lessons of PESThere are importa
- Page 179 and 180: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 181 and 182: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 183 and 184: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 185 and 186: MENT TO LOCAL HANDSare allowed to c
- Page 187 and 188: Revitalizing Rural Representationin
- Page 189 and 190: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 191 and 192: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 193 and 194: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 195 and 196: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 197 and 198: FIGURE 3 COST OF REMITTANCES TO MEX
- Page 199 and 200: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 201 and 202: RECOMMENDATIONS:ADVANCINGENTERPRISE
- Page 203 and 204: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 205 and 206: PROJECTED CHANGES IN AGRICULTURE IN
- Page 207 and 208: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 209 and 210: 2. Provide Financial Support for Ne
- Page 211 and 212: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 213 and 214: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 215 and 216:
IIP A R T1Population and Human Well
- Page 217 and 218:
abroad. In order to capture a count
- Page 219 and 220:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 221 and 222:
Adult Literacy Rate: The availabili
- Page 223 and 224:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 225 and 226:
Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
- Page 227 and 228:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 229 and 230:
DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOT
- Page 231 and 232:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 233 and 234:
The Corruption Perceptions Index (C
- Page 235 and 236:
A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T SWorl
- Page 237 and 238:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 239 and 240:
and Environmental Management; Austr
- Page 241 and 242:
R E F E R E N C E Shttp://www.water
- Page 243 and 244:
R E F E R E N C E S■■■■■
- Page 245 and 246:
R E F E R E N C E S■ Subedi, B.,
- Page 247 and 248:
R E F E R E N C E S■■CARE Inter
- Page 249 and 250:
R E F E R E N C E SChapter 3Banglad
- Page 251 and 252:
R E F E R E N C E SIn Mission (SIM)
- Page 253 and 254:
R E F E R E N C E S■■■■■
- Page 255 and 256:
Box 4.2■■■Larson, A., and J.
- Page 257 and 258:
IndexItalic page numbers refer to f
- Page 259 and 260:
I N D E Xcross-cutting lessons from
- Page 261 and 262:
I N D E XDemandconservancies as dem
- Page 263 and 264:
I N D E XGThe Gambiacommunity fores
- Page 265 and 266:
I N D E XInterAmerican Development
- Page 267 and 268:
I N D E XMaya Biosphere Carbon Proj
- Page 269 and 270:
I N D E XOrganizational scaling up,
- Page 271 and 272:
I N D E XScaling up, 3-45, 189-201c
- Page 273 and 274:
I N D E XUnited Nations Development
- Page 275 and 276:
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMM
- Page 277:
WORLDRESOURCES200WORLDRESOURCES2008