Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute
Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute
Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Resource DegradationA decline in <strong>the</strong> status or productivity <strong>of</strong> a local natural resourceis frequently a significant factor in generating community demand.A sudden drop in fish catches or <strong>the</strong> depletion <strong>of</strong> a certain stock <strong>of</strong>tree may spur community members to act or to be more receptiveto new approaches to managing <strong>the</strong> resource, particularly if <strong>the</strong>resource is or was an important part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> household incomestream. The decline in <strong>the</strong> resource must take place over a shortenough time span to be noticeable; if changes are too gradual,individuals may not perceive <strong>the</strong> events as serious enough at anyone point in time to justify action (White and Runge 1995:1685).While serious resource degradation may build demand to address<strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> resources, this demand alone may not be sufficient tospur action without a convincing alternative at hand.Changing InformationInformation is always a critical variable in <strong>the</strong> demand equation.What people know about <strong>the</strong> changing resource situation in <strong>the</strong>ircommunity, new opportunities for using resources, or <strong>the</strong> potentialreturn on a new investment is usually <strong>the</strong> deciding factor inwhe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y consent to community resource management. Newinformation can come from a variety <strong>of</strong> sources, with demonstrationsand pilot projects being particularly effective in conveyingan alternative to <strong>the</strong> status quo. The “demonstration effect”—when villagers or <strong>the</strong>ir leaders see for <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>the</strong> benefits thatB U I L D I N G O W N E R S H I P, C A P A C I T Y , A N D C O N N E C T I O No<strong>the</strong>r communities have gained by managing <strong>the</strong>ir watershed,forest, or fishing grounds differently—is <strong>of</strong>ten quick and persuasive.In Niger, where NGOs initially helped farmers to regeneratetrees and implement basic soil and water conservation practices,<strong>the</strong> visible and rapid yield increases created by <strong>the</strong>se practicesinspired neighboring farmers to follow suit. The spread has beendescribed as “viral,” with <strong>the</strong> techniques now used widely acrossNiger. (See Chapter 3: Turning Back <strong>the</strong> Desert: How FarmersHave Transformed Niger’s Landscapes and Livelihoods.)However, seeing demonstration projects in person is not <strong>the</strong>only way that villagers can get new information. Street fairs,<strong>the</strong>ater, radio broadcasts, pamphlets, posters, and video presentationscan all broadcast possibilities, shift consciousnesses, andchange tastes, making people more aware <strong>of</strong> options for action(Lobo 2007). Awards and prizes that recognize good practices canalso be an effective tool for delivering new information and generatingdemand. The Equator Prize <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UN DevelopmentProgramme (UNDP), which pr<strong>of</strong>iles and rewards successfulecosystem enterprises, has had a substantial demonstration effectsince its establishment in 2002 (UNDP 2008a). (See Box 2.1.)This emphasizes <strong>the</strong> important role that communication plays inbuilding demand at <strong>the</strong> village level. In most cases, being an effectiveadvocate for community resource management requiressome mastery <strong>of</strong> communication tools and forums.Engaged LeadershipEffective leaders are able to understand <strong>the</strong> forces for change in acommunity, express a guiding vision, <strong>of</strong>fer alternatives for action,and organize <strong>the</strong>ir constituents first to make a choice betweenalternatives and <strong>the</strong>n to carry through on <strong>the</strong>ir choice. In thissense, leaders provide both <strong>the</strong> spark <strong>of</strong> demand and also a stabilizingforce connecting demand to collective action. In <strong>the</strong>beginning, a leader’s personal charisma may be crucial in selling<strong>the</strong> vision for action and arousing <strong>the</strong> willingness to make acommitment to a new resource management scheme. Because <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir position, education, and experience, leaders can confer legitimacyto a proposed line <strong>of</strong> action or doom it if <strong>the</strong>y find itunacceptable. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir connections to those in power (aform <strong>of</strong> bridging social capital), <strong>the</strong>y can also communicate thislegitimacy to external sources <strong>of</strong> funding or support. Particularlyin those situations where a new management regime or enterpriseis stimulated by outside actors (NGOs, governments, etc.), <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> local leaders with <strong>the</strong> capacity to function within<strong>the</strong> community according to its norms greatly increases <strong>the</strong>chances for success (Seymour 1994: 481–486).New Incentives or Resource AccessFactors originating outside <strong>the</strong> community, such as changes in statetenure policies or <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> state or international funds tosupport a change in resource management, can also be powerfulinducements for change. Namibia’s conservancies could not take<strong>of</strong>f until <strong>the</strong> national legislature enacted <strong>the</strong> Nature ConservationAct in 1996 that devolved wildlife tenure to local groups. Likewise,<strong>the</strong> widespread adoption <strong>of</strong> new watershed management practicesContinues on page 61OWNERSHIP55