W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■<strong>Institute</strong> for Environment and Development. Online at http://www.iied.org/pubs/display.php?o=12532IIED&n=11&l=31&k=cotulaCummings, A. 2004. Against All Odds: Innovative Business Initiatives inRural El Salvador, Central America. PhD Thesis, Aalborg University,Denmark. El Salvador: Fundación Nacional para el Desarrollo. Online athttp://forskningsbasen.deff.dk/ddf/rec.external?id=auc13211585.Dahal, D.R. 1994. A Review <strong>of</strong> Forest User Groups: Case Studies from EasternNepal. Katmandu, Nepal: International Center for Integrated Mountain Development.Online at http://www.odi.org.uk/fecc/resources/greyliterature/joint%20forest%20management/Dill%20Ram%20Dahal/index.htmlDas Gupta, M., H. Grandvoinnett, and M. Romani. 2003. “Fostering Community-DrivenDevelopment: What Role for <strong>the</strong> State?” <strong>World</strong> Bank PolicyResearch Working Paper 2969. Washington, DC: <strong>World</strong> Bank. Online athttp://go.worldbank.org/XXH48NYNF0.Dean’s Beans. 2008. Home. Orange, Massachusetts, USA: Dean’s Beans.Online at http://www.deansbeans.com/c<strong>of</strong>fee/index.html.Deininger, K. 2003. Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction.Washington, DC: <strong>World</strong> Bank; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Online athttp://go.worldbank.org/T9WPA67D50.Deverill, P. 2000. Designing Water and Sanitation Projects to Meet Demands:The Engineer’s Role, Background Paper. Leicestershire, UK: Water Engineeringand Development Centre, Loughborough University. Online athttp://wedc.lboro.ac.uk/projects/proj_contents0/WEJT1%20-%20Designing%20for%20Demand/www/outputs/Background-paper.doc.Deverill, P., A. Wedgwood, S. Bibby, and I. Smout. 2002. Designing WaterSupply and Sanitation Projects to Meet Demand in Rural and Peri-UrbanCommunities: Book 1, Concepts, Principles, and Practice. Leicestershire, UK:Water Engineering and Development Centre, Loughborough University.Online at http://wedc.lboro.ac.uk/staff/staff_details.php?id=37.Ebrahim, A. 2003. NGOs and Organizational Change: Discourse, Reporting,and Learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Edwards, M., and D. Hulme. 1992. “Scaling Up NGO Impact on Development:Learning from Experience.” Development in Practice, 2(2):77–91.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2004. <strong>World</strong> Overview <strong>of</strong> ConservationApproaches and Technologies (WOCAT): Impact Analysis, LANDCARE,Claveria Landcare Association (CLCA). Berne, Switzerland: WOCAT. Online athttp://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/wocat/wqasum8.asp?questid=PHI04.Feder, G. 2002. The Intricacies <strong>of</strong> Land Markets – Why <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> BankSucceeds in Economic Reform through Land Registration and TenureSecurity. PowerPoint presented at Conference <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> International Federation<strong>of</strong> Surveyors, Washington, DC, Apr. 19–26. Online at http://pdf.wri.org/ref/feder_02_<strong>the</strong>_intricacies.pdf.Ford Foundation. 2002. Sustainable Solutions: Building Assets for Empowermentand Sustainable Development. New York: Ford Foundation. Online athttp://fordfound.org/pdfs/impact/sustainable_solutions.pdf.Francis, P., and M. Amuyunzu-Nyamongo. 2005. Bitter Harvest: The SocialCosts <strong>of</strong> State Failure in Rural Kenya. Paper presented at New Frontiers <strong>of</strong>Social Policy: Development in a Globalizing <strong>World</strong>, <strong>World</strong> Bank, Washington,DC, Dec. 12–15. Online at http://go.worldbank.org/1NX2RIW3B0.Fritsch, O., and J. Newig. 2006. Improving Environmental Quality ThroughParticipation? A Critical Perspective on <strong>the</strong> Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Public Participation.Osnabrueck, Germany: Osnabrueck University.Gibson, C., J. Williams, and E. Ostrom. 2005. “Local Enforcement and BetterForests.” <strong>World</strong> Development 33(2):273–284.■ Harper, M., and A. Roy. 2000. Cooperative Success: What Makes Group EnterpriseSucceed. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action.■ Harsch, E. 2001. “Making Trade Work for <strong>Poor</strong> Women.” Africa Recovery15(4):6. Online at http://www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/afrec/vol15no4/154shea.htm.■ Hellin, J., M. Lundy, and M. Meijer. 2007. “Farmer Organization and MarketAccess.” LEISA Magazine 23(1):26–27. Online at http://www.leisa.info/index.php?url=article-details.tpl&p%5B_id%5D=90668.■ Holt-Giménez, E. 2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from LatinAmerica’s Farmer to Farmer Movement for Sustainable Agriculture. Oakland,California, USA: Food First Books.■ Hooper, M., R. Jafry, M. Marolla, and J. Phan. 2004. “Scaling-Up CommunityEfforts to Reach <strong>the</strong> MDGs: An Assessment <strong>of</strong> Experience from <strong>the</strong> EquatorPrize.” In The Millennium Development Goals and Conservation: ManagingNature’s <strong>Wealth</strong> for Society’s Health, pp. 129–142. London: International <strong>Institute</strong>for Environment and Development. Online at http://www.iied.org/Gov/mdgs/publications.html.■ Howell, J., and J. Pearce. 2000. “Civil Society: Technical Instrument or SocialForce for Change?” In New Roles and Relevance: Development NGOs and <strong>the</strong>Challenge <strong>of</strong> Change, D. Lewis and T. Wallace Bloomfield, eds., Chapter 7.West Hartford, Connecticut, USA: Kumarian Press.■ IIED (International <strong>Institute</strong> for Environment and Development). 2006.Innovation in Securing Land Rights in Africa: Lessons from Experience.Briefing Paper 2006. London: IIED. Online at http://www.iied.org/pubs/display.php?o=12531IIED&n=1&l=2&k=Innovation%20in%20Securing%20Land%20Rights%20in%20Africa.■ IIED (International <strong>Institute</strong> for Environment and Development). 2007.Learning from Local Organisations about Poverty Reduction and EnvironmentalManagement: A Participatory Review. London: IIED. Online athttp://www.povertyenvironment.net/?q=filestore2/download/962/Local%20organisations%20work%20plan%200107%20PEP.doc.■ IUCN (<strong>World</strong> Conservation Union) Botswana. 2005a. Botswana CBNRMSupport Program: BOCOBONET. Gaborone, Botswana: IUCN Botswana.Online at http://www.cbnrm.bw/Partners/BOCOBONET.html.■ IUCN (<strong>World</strong> Conservation Union) Botswana. 2005b. Botswana CBNRM SupportProgram: Community Based Tourism. Gaborone, Botswana: IUCN Botswana.Online at http://www.cbnrm.bw/cbnrmbotswana/communitytourism.html.■ IUCN (<strong>World</strong> Conservation Union) Botswana. 2005c. Botswana CBNRMSupport Program: Conservation. Gaborone, Botswana: IUCN Botswana.Online at http://www.cbnrm.bw/cbnrmbotswana/conservation.html.■ IUCN (<strong>World</strong> Conservation Union) Botswana. 2006. Botswana Support ProgramAchievements.Gaborone,Botswana:IUCNBotswana.Onlineat:http://www.cbnrm.bw/supportprogramme/achievements.html. Viewed Sept. 18, 2007.■ Jones, B., and A. Mosimane. 2007. Promoting Integrated Community-BasedNatural Resource Management as a Means to Combat Desertification: The Livingin a Finite Environment (LIFE) Project and <strong>the</strong> Khoadi Hoas and Nyae NyaeConservancies, Namibia. Washington, DC: International <strong>Resources</strong> Group. Onlineat http://www.frameweb.org/ev_en.php?ID=42632_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC.■ Kanungo, P. 2004. Broadening SME Networking and Cluster Development:UNIDO Initiatives—Glimpses from Nicaragua and India. Washington, DC:<strong>World</strong> Bank. Online at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/<strong>Resources</strong>/15110_Nicaragua_Case_Study.pdf.230
R E F E R E N C E S■■■■■■■Kerr, J., G. Pangare, and V.L. Pangare. 2002. Watershed DevelopmentProjects in India: An Evaluation. Research Report 127. Washington, DC:International Food Policy Research <strong>Institute</strong>. Online at: http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/abstract/127/rr127.pdf.Khan, S.S., and J.K. Tareen. 2004. Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: Case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Rural Support Programs (RSPs) in Pakistan. PowerPoint presented at ScalingUp Poverty Reduction Conference, Shanghai, China, May. Washington, DC:<strong>World</strong> Bank. Online at http://go.worldbank.org/0PVXAD8LO0Kolavalli, S., and J. Kerr. 2002. “Scaling up Participatory Watershed Developmentin India.” Development and Change, 33(2):213–235.Koopman, J., R. Kweka, M. Mboya, and S.M. Wangwe. 2001. Community Participationin Traditional Irrigation Scheme Rehabilitation Projects in Tanzania:Report <strong>of</strong> a Collaborative Research Project. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Ministry<strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Cooperatives, Irrigation Section.Kruijssen, F., and S. Somsri. 2006. Marketing Local Biodiversity in Thailand:Identification <strong>of</strong> a Possible Good Practice for On-farm Biodiversity Management<strong>of</strong> Tropical Fruit Trees. Paper presented at Conference on InternationalAgricultural Research for Develop, University <strong>of</strong> Bonn, Germany Oct.11–13.Online at http://www.tropentag.de/2006/abstracts/full/221.pdf.Lewis, D. 2005. Markets, Food Security and Conservation: A Model for RuralDevelopment in Zambia. New York City: Wildlife Conservation Society. Onlineat http://www.itswild.org/research_and_policy. Viewed 1/30/2008.LMMA (Locally Managed Marine Area) Network. 2007. Enhancing LMMA Effectivenessthrough Continued Learning: Annual Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LMMA Network for2006. Suva, Fiji: LMMA Network. Online at http://www.lmmanetwork.org/Site_Page.cfm?PageID=64.■ Lobo, C. 2007. Managing Trustee. Watershed Organisation Trust, Ahmednagar,Maharashtra, India. Personal communication. May and July.■ Lobo, C. 2008. Managing Trustee, Watershed Organisation Trust, Ahmednagar,Maharashtra, India. Personal communication. Feb.■ Locke, R. 2002. Building Trust and Social Embeddedness and Labor UnionRevival. Paper presented at <strong>the</strong> Conference on Economic Governance andPolitical Institutions, São Paulo, Brazil, March. São Paulo, Brazil: CentroBrasileiro De Analise e Planejamento.■ Lok Sabha (Indian House <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> People). 2006. The Scheduled Tribes and O<strong>the</strong>rTraditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition <strong>of</strong> Forest Rights) Bill, 2006. Delhi, India:Lok Sabha. Dec. 15. Online at http://forestrightsact.awardspace.com/Act.pdf.■ Macqueen, D., S. Vermeulen, C. Kazoora, F. Merry, S. Ousman, S. Saigal, S.Wen, and H. Weyerhauser. 2005. “Advancement Through Association: AppropriateSupport for Associations <strong>of</strong> Small and Medium Forest Enterprise.” InHow to Make Poverty History: The Central Role <strong>of</strong> Local Organizations inMeeting <strong>the</strong> MDGs. T. Biggs and D. Satterthwaite, eds., pp. 79–98. London:International <strong>Institute</strong> for Environment and Development. Online athttp://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/11000IIED.pdf.■ Macqueen, D., S. Bose, S. Bukula, C. Kazoora, S. Ousman, N. Porro, and H.Weyerhaeuser. 2006. Working Toge<strong>the</strong>r: Forest-Linked Small and MediumEnterprise Associations and Collective Action. London: International <strong>Institute</strong>for Environment and Development. Online at http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/14521IIED.pdf.■ Manikutty, S. 2002. “Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd.(GCMMF).” Asian Case Research Journal, 6:205–239.■ Mansuri, G., and V. Rao. 2003. Evaluating Community-Based and Community-DrivenDevelopment: A Critical Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Evidence. Washington,DC: <strong>World</strong> Bank. Online at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECAREGTOPCOMDRIDEV/<strong>Resources</strong>/DECstudy.pdf■ Marsh, R. 2003. Working with Local Institutions to Support Sustainable Livelihoods.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United Nations, Sustainable DevelopmentDepartment. Online at http://www.fao.org/sd/2002/PE0702a_en.htm.■ McCarthy, S. 2007. Chief <strong>of</strong> Party, Agricultural Cooperatives in Ethiopia (ACE),1998–2004. ACDI/VOCA, Washington, DC. Personal Communication. Nov. 27.■ McFadden, S. 2007. “Organic Growth.” Boston Business Journal. Feb. 2.■ Meinzen-Dick, R., and M. Di Gregorio. 2004. “Overview.” In Collective Actionand Property Rights for Sustainable Development. R. Meinzen-Dick and M. DiGregorio, eds. Brief 1. 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and <strong>the</strong> Environment,Focus 11. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research<strong>Institute</strong>. Online at http://www.ifpri.org/2020/focus/focus11.asp.■ Middleton, L. 2008. “Community Markets for Conservation: WCS at Work inZambia.” Wildlife Magazine, Jan., pp. 22–29. Bronx, New York, USA: TheWildlife Conservation Society.■ NACSO (Namibia Association <strong>of</strong> CBNRM Support Organisations). 2003. NACSOServices. Windhoek, Namibia: NACSO. Online at http://www.nacso.org.na.■ NACSO (Namibian Association <strong>of</strong> CBNRM Support Organizations). 2006. Namibia’sCommunal Conservancies: A Review <strong>of</strong> Progress and Challenges in 2005. Windhoek,Namibia: NACSO. Online at http://www.irdnc.org.na/conservancies.htm.■ Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing <strong>the</strong> Commons: The Evolution <strong>of</strong> Institutions forCollective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.■ Ostrom, E. 2004. “Understanding Collective Action and Collective ActionProblems.” In Collective Action and Property Rights for Sustainable Development.R. Meinzen-Dick and M. Di Gregorio, eds., Brief 2. 2020 Vision for Food,231
- Page 1 and 2:
2008WORLDRESOURCESRoots ofResilienc
- Page 3:
WORLDRESOURCES2008
- Page 6 and 7:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 10 and 11:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 12 and 13:
Roots ofResilie
- Page 14 and 15:
Scaling up nature-based enterprises
- Page 16 and 17:
Examples of such economic and socia
- Page 18 and 19:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 20 and 21:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 22 and 23:
BOX 1.2 WHAT IS SCALING UP?10In gen
- Page 24:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 27 and 28:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 29 and 30:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 31 and 32:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 33 and 34:
PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION LIVING UND
- Page 36 and 37:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 38 and 39:
Investing in the social capital of
- Page 40 and 41:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 42 and 43:
UPDATE: SCALING UP NAMIBIA’SCOMMU
- Page 44 and 45:
UPDATE: NAMIBIAincluding a limited
- Page 46 and 47:
UPDATE: NAMIBIAGROWTH IN COMMUNAL C
- Page 48 and 49:
UPDATE: NAMIBIATorra Conservancy su
- Page 50 and 51:
UPDATE: SCALING UP LOCAL MANAGEMENT
- Page 52 and 53:
UPDATE: FIJIextensively with the co
- Page 54 and 55:
UPDATE: FIJI42of the iqoliqoli comm
- Page 56 and 57:
UPDATE: FIJI2007a:iv). A separate s
- Page 58 and 59:
Scaling up environmental enterprise
- Page 60 and 61:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 62 and 63:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 64 and 65:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 66 and 67:
OWNERSHIP54W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 68 and 69:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 70 and 71:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 72 and 73:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 74 and 75:
OWNERSHIP62W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 76 and 77:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 78 and 79:
OWNERSHIP66give marginalized groups
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 2.2 LESSONS FROM THE FIELD:GENE
- Page 82 and 83:
Box 2.2 LESSONS FROM THE FIELD70It
- Page 84 and 85:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 86 and 87:
Box 2.3 WOMEN ON THE MOVE: SCALING
- Page 88 and 89:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 90 and 91:
BOX 2.4 WATERSHED ORGANISATION TRUS
- Page 92 and 93:
CAPACITY80W O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 94 and 95:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 96 and 97:
BOX 2.5LOCAL EMPOWERMENT, UPWARD IN
- Page 98 and 99:
CAPACITY86W O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 100 and 101:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 102 and 103:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 104 and 105:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 106 and 107:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 108 and 109:
CONNECTION96W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 110 and 111:
BOX 2.6CURING POVERTY?TAKING ADVANT
- Page 112 and 113:
BOX 2.7 ETHIOPIAN COFFEE COOPERATIV
- Page 114 and 115:
BOX 2.7 ETHIOPIAN COFFEE COOPERATIV
- Page 116 and 117:
CONNECTIONW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 118 and 119:
CONNECTION106W O R L D R E S O U R
- Page 121 and 122:
B U I L D I N G O W N E R S H I P,
- Page 123 and 124:
ROUTESTORESILIENCEIN THIS REPORT WE
- Page 125 and 126:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 127 and 128:
Creating Institutions, Empowering C
- Page 129 and 130:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 131 and 132:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 133 and 134:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 135 and 136:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 137 and 138:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 139 and 140:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D Sregio
- Page 141 and 142:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SThe C
- Page 143 and 144:
Intermediaries Help Build Necessary
- Page 145 and 146:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SENTER
- Page 147 and 148:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D Sit to
- Page 149 and 150:
Chemonics and IRG 2000:A-V-2). Hist
- Page 151 and 152:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SLEARN
- Page 153 and 154:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SAcros
- Page 155 and 156:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 157 and 158:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 159 and 160:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 161 and 162:
Demi-lunesAdding Value: Reclaiming
- Page 163 and 164:
Storing milletNationally, figures f
- Page 165 and 166:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 167 and 168:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 169 and 170:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 171 and 172:
DRIVINGTHESCALINGPROCESSC H A P T E
- Page 173 and 174:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 175 and 176:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 177 and 178:
The Lessons of PESThere are importa
- Page 179 and 180:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 181 and 182:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 183 and 184:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 185 and 186:
MENT TO LOCAL HANDSare allowed to c
- Page 187 and 188:
Revitalizing Rural Representationin
- Page 189 and 190:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 191 and 192: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 193 and 194: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 195 and 196: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 197 and 198: FIGURE 3 COST OF REMITTANCES TO MEX
- Page 199 and 200: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 201 and 202: RECOMMENDATIONS:ADVANCINGENTERPRISE
- Page 203 and 204: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 205 and 206: PROJECTED CHANGES IN AGRICULTURE IN
- Page 207 and 208: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 209 and 210: 2. Provide Financial Support for Ne
- Page 211 and 212: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 213 and 214: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 215 and 216: IIP A R T1Population and Human Well
- Page 217 and 218: abroad. In order to capture a count
- Page 219 and 220: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 221 and 222: Adult Literacy Rate: The availabili
- Page 223 and 224: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 225 and 226: Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
- Page 227 and 228: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 229 and 230: DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOT
- Page 231 and 232: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 233 and 234: The Corruption Perceptions Index (C
- Page 235 and 236: A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T SWorl
- Page 237 and 238: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 239 and 240: and Environmental Management; Austr
- Page 241: R E F E R E N C E Shttp://www.water
- Page 245 and 246: R E F E R E N C E S■ Subedi, B.,
- Page 247 and 248: R E F E R E N C E S■■CARE Inter
- Page 249 and 250: R E F E R E N C E SChapter 3Banglad
- Page 251 and 252: R E F E R E N C E SIn Mission (SIM)
- Page 253 and 254: R E F E R E N C E S■■■■■
- Page 255 and 256: Box 4.2■■■Larson, A., and J.
- Page 257 and 258: IndexItalic page numbers refer to f
- Page 259 and 260: I N D E Xcross-cutting lessons from
- Page 261 and 262: I N D E XDemandconservancies as dem
- Page 263 and 264: I N D E XGThe Gambiacommunity fores
- Page 265 and 266: I N D E XInterAmerican Development
- Page 267 and 268: I N D E XMaya Biosphere Carbon Proj
- Page 269 and 270: I N D E XOrganizational scaling up,
- Page 271 and 272: I N D E XScaling up, 3-45, 189-201c
- Page 273 and 274: I N D E XUnited Nations Development
- Page 275 and 276: UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMM
- Page 277: WORLDRESOURCES200WORLDRESOURCES2008