4Institutions and Governance: Technical Notes220DEFINITIONS AND METHODOLOGYFreedom Indices, compiled by <strong>the</strong> nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organization Freedom House, rangefrom 1 to 7, with 1 representing <strong>the</strong> most free and 7 representing <strong>the</strong> least free. Todetermine each rating, researchers answer a series <strong>of</strong> survey questions, makingsmall adjustments for factors such as extreme violence. Freedom House notes thata poor rating for a country “is not necessarily a comment on <strong>the</strong> intentions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>government, but may indicate real restrictions on liberty caused by non-governmentalterror.”The Civil Liberties Index measures freedom <strong>of</strong> expression, assembly, association,and religion. Countries with a rating <strong>of</strong> 1 generally have an established andequitable rule <strong>of</strong> law with free economic activity. A rating <strong>of</strong> 2 indicates somedeficiencies, while a rating <strong>of</strong> 3, 4, or 5 indicates varying degrees <strong>of</strong> censorship,political terror, and prevention <strong>of</strong> free association. Countries with a rating <strong>of</strong>6 experience severely restricted freedom <strong>of</strong> expression and association coupledwith political terror (for example, political prisoners). A rating <strong>of</strong> 7 indicates virtuallyno freedom.The Political Rights Index measures <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> freedom in <strong>the</strong> electoralprocess, political pluralism and participation, and functioning <strong>of</strong> government. Arating <strong>of</strong> 1 indicates free and fair elections, political competition, and autonomy forall citizens, including minority groups. A rating <strong>of</strong> 2 indicates some corruption,violence, political discrimination, and military influence. These same factors play aprogressively larger role in countries with a ranking <strong>of</strong> 3, 4, or 5. Countries andterritories with political rights rated 6 are ruled by military juntas, one-party dictatorships,religious hierarchies, or autocrats. A rating <strong>of</strong> 7 indicates nonexistentpolitical rights due to extremely oppressive regimes, civil war, extreme violence, orwarlord rule.Regulatory Barriers to Registering Property, published by <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank’sDoing Business database, are compiled via survey in conjunction with academicadvisers, using a simple business case to ensure comparability across countriesand over time. Surveys are administered through more than 5,000 local experts,including lawyers, business consultants, accountants, government <strong>of</strong>ficials, ando<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>essionals routinely administering or advising on legal and regulatoryrequirements. Broadly speaking, higher values here represent regulatory environmentsthat stifle <strong>the</strong> formalization <strong>of</strong> property rights.Average Number <strong>of</strong> Days to Register measures <strong>the</strong> time, in calendar days,necessary for a business to complete <strong>the</strong> legal and bureaucratic proceduresrequired for registering property. Governments differ significantly in <strong>the</strong> requirementsfor this process. Data for registering property are produced assuming astandardized case <strong>of</strong> an entrepreneur who wants to purchase land and a buildingin <strong>the</strong> country’s largest business city.Average Cost to Register measures <strong>the</strong> cost to a business, expressed as apercent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> property value, needed to complete <strong>the</strong> legal and bureaucratic proceduresrequired for registering property. Cost includes fees, transfer taxes, stampduties, and any o<strong>the</strong>r payment to <strong>the</strong> property registry, notaries, public agencies, orlawyers. O<strong>the</strong>r taxes, such as capital gains tax or value added tax, are excludedfrom <strong>the</strong> cost measure. Data are produced assuming a standardized case <strong>of</strong> anentrepreneur who wants to purchase land and a building in <strong>the</strong> country’s largestbusiness city.Government Expenditures as a percent <strong>of</strong> gross domestic product roughlyindicate <strong>the</strong> economic importance <strong>of</strong> public health, public education, and militaryactivities in national economies.Public Health Expenditure consists <strong>of</strong> recurrent and capital spending fromgovernment (both central and local) budgets, external borrowings and grants(including donations from international agencies and NGOs), and social (orcompulsory) health insurance funds. The estimates <strong>of</strong> health expenditure comemostly from <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Health Organization’s (WHO) <strong>World</strong> Health Report 2003 andits subsequent updates, and from <strong>the</strong> Organisation for Economic Co-operation andDevelopment (OECD) for its member countries, supplemented by <strong>World</strong> Bankpoverty assessments and country-sector studies. Data are also drawn from <strong>the</strong>International Monetary Fund.Public Education Expenditure consists <strong>of</strong> public spending on public educationplus subsidies to private education at <strong>the</strong> primary, secondary, and post-secondarylevels. Foreign aid for education is excluded. Education expenditure estimates areprovided to <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> for Statistics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United NationsEducational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). UNESCO compiles itsdata from annual financial reports <strong>of</strong> central or federal governments and state orregional administrations.Military Expenditure is defined by <strong>the</strong> Stockholm International Peace Research<strong>Institute</strong> (SIPRI) as “all current and capital expenditure on: (a) <strong>the</strong> armed forces,including peacekeeping forces; (b) defense ministries and o<strong>the</strong>r governmentagencies engaged in defense projects; (c) paramilitary forces, when judged to betrained an equipped for military operations; and (d) military space activities.”Expenditures include <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> procurements, personnel, research and development,construction, operations, maintenance, and military aid to o<strong>the</strong>r countries.Civil defense, veterans’ benefits, demobilization, and destruction <strong>of</strong> weapons arenot included as military expenditures. The <strong>World</strong> Bank uses data collected by SIPRIfor its annual <strong>World</strong> Development Indicators military expenditure dataset.Press Freedom is “<strong>the</strong> degree to which each country permits <strong>the</strong> free flow <strong>of</strong> information,”according to Freedom House, ranked on a scale <strong>of</strong> 1 to 100. Countries witha score between 1 and 30 are considered to have a “Free” media; 31 to 60, “PartlyFree”; and 61 to 100, “Not Free.” This survey does not measure press responsibility;ra<strong>the</strong>r, it measures <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> freedom in <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> information. Pressfreedom data are collected from overseas correspondents, staff travel, internationalvisitors, <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> human rights organizations, specialists ingeographic and geopolitical areas, <strong>the</strong> reports <strong>of</strong> governments, and a variety <strong>of</strong>domestic and international news media. The final index is a sum <strong>of</strong> three separatecomponents that reflect <strong>the</strong> legal, political, and economic environments that pressin each country operate within.Status <strong>of</strong> Freedom <strong>of</strong> Information (FOI) Legislation measures a government’sguarantee <strong>of</strong> public access to information by placing each country in one <strong>of</strong> threecategories: In Effect: 57 countries legally guarantee public access to governmentrecords through comprehensive FOI laws; Pending: 39 additional countries areconsidering adopting freedom <strong>of</strong> information acts; None: countries not listed haveno pending FOI legislation (represented by “..” in <strong>the</strong> data table, which couldindicate that no data are available for this country). Access to information aboutgovernment activities increases transparency and allows citizens to more effectivelycombat corruption. Data are compiled by Privacy International by authorDavid Banisar on a country-by-country basis. The specifics <strong>of</strong> each country’s legislationand constitutional guarantees are explained in detail in <strong>the</strong> sourcepublications.The Digital Access Index is a composite score, developed by <strong>the</strong> InternationalTelecommunications Union (ITU), which reflects <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> each country’spopulation to take advantage <strong>of</strong> internet communication technologies. It rangesfrom 1 to 100, where 100 equals <strong>the</strong> most access. The Index is calculated as aweighted average <strong>of</strong> eight variables describing infrastructure, affordability, educationallevel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population, quality <strong>of</strong> information and communication technologyservices, and Internet usage.
The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) measures <strong>the</strong> degree to which corruptionis perceived to exist among public <strong>of</strong>ficials and politicians. Ratings range invalue from 10 (least corrupt) to 0 (most corrupt). The survey measures public sectorcorruption or <strong>the</strong> abuse <strong>of</strong> public <strong>of</strong>fice for private gain. It measures local andnational governments, not domestic and foreign corporations doing business in<strong>the</strong>se countries. The CPI is compiled from 12 surveys originating from nine differentindependent institutions. A country is included in <strong>the</strong> CPI only if <strong>the</strong>re are dataavailable from 3 or more surveys. The surveys measure <strong>the</strong> perceptions <strong>of</strong> localresidents, expatriates, business people, academics, and risk analysts. Surveyresults are combined in three-year periods to reduce abrupt variations that couldpotentially be caused by errors. Thus, figures for 2006 are based on surveys takennot only in 2006, but in 2004 and 2005 as well.FREQUENCY OF UPDATE BY DATA PROVIDERSAll <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data sets in this table are updated annually by <strong>the</strong> original providers, with<strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Digital Access Index, Public Education Expenditures, and <strong>the</strong>Status <strong>of</strong> FOI Legislation, which are updated intermittently.DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOTESFreedom Indices: Data and methodologies are subject to rigorous internal andexternal reviews, <strong>the</strong> data are reproducible, <strong>the</strong> index components are clear, andratings are assigned by a centralized team <strong>of</strong> researchers. Thus, <strong>the</strong> data areconsidered to be reliable. None<strong>the</strong>less, this index is measuring ideas and behaviorsand not a discrete physical quantity, and, as such, rigid score comparisons andrankings are discouraged. To ensure comparability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ratings from year to year,any changes to <strong>the</strong> methodology are introduced incrementally.Regulatory Barriers to Registering Property: Data are very reliable, but <strong>the</strong>limited definition <strong>of</strong> this indicator may restrict its applicability. For example,collected data refer to only businesses in <strong>the</strong> country’s most populous city. Inaddition, data <strong>of</strong>ten focus on a specific business form—a limited liability company<strong>of</strong> a specified size—and may not be representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regulation on o<strong>the</strong>rbusinesses. The methodology also assumes that a business has full information onwhat is required and does not waste time when completing procedures. In practice,completing a procedure may take longer if <strong>the</strong> business lacks information or isunable to follow up promptly.Public Health Expenditure: The values reported here represent <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> anextensive effort by WHO, OECD, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> Bank to produce a comprehensivedata set on national health accounts. None<strong>the</strong>less, few developing countries havehealth accounts that are methodologically consistent with national accountingprocedures. Data on public spending at <strong>the</strong> sub-national level are not aggregatedin all countries, making total public expenditure on health care difficult to measure.WHO cautions that <strong>the</strong>se data should only be used for an “order <strong>of</strong> magnitude”estimate and that specific cross-country comparisons should be avoided.Public Education Expenditure: In some cases data refer only to a ministry <strong>of</strong>education’s expenditures, excluding o<strong>the</strong>r ministries and local authorities that spenda part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir budget on educational activities. Spending on religious schools, whichconstitutes a large portion <strong>of</strong> educational spending in some developing countries,may be included. The <strong>World</strong> Bank cautions that <strong>the</strong>se data do not measure <strong>the</strong> effectivenessor levels <strong>of</strong> attainment in a particular educational system.Military Expenditure: The entire data set has been carefully compiled with extensiveanalysis by a single provider, SIPRI, which makes <strong>the</strong>se data fairly reliable.When a time series is not available or a country’s definition <strong>of</strong> military expenditurediffers from SIPRI’s, estimates are made based on analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial governmentbudget statistics. Estimates are always based on empirical evidence, not assumptionsor extrapolations. SIPRI cautions that military expenditure does not relatedirectly to military capability or security.Status <strong>of</strong> FOI Legislation: While <strong>the</strong> FOI data have been thoroughly researched,<strong>the</strong>re are unavoidable difficulties in assigning each country to one <strong>of</strong> threecategories. Some countries have laws guaranteeing access, but <strong>the</strong> laws are notenforced. Still o<strong>the</strong>rs guarantee access to government documents in specificcategories, excluding access in o<strong>the</strong>r categories.Digital Access Index: The variables selected to build this indicator are from anumber <strong>of</strong> reputable sources including ITU’s quarterly survey <strong>of</strong> information andcommunication technologies around <strong>the</strong> world. However, as with any complex globaldataset, complete accuracy is difficult to ensure.Corruption Perceptions Index: Overall, <strong>the</strong> data are considered to be reliable.Survey responses from residents in each country correlate well with responses fromexperts abroad. The data are reproducible and <strong>the</strong> index components are clear.None<strong>the</strong>less, while <strong>the</strong> CPI can illustrate rough comparisons, rigid internationalscore comparisons are discouraged. While year-to-year variation in scores isaffected by changes in survey samples and methodology, findings indicate that ingeneral, trends in <strong>the</strong> data over time are reasonably accurate. Confidence intervalsare published in tabular format by Transparency International.SOURCESFreedom Indices: Freedom House. 2007. Freedom in <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong> 2007: The AnnualSurvey <strong>of</strong> Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Freedom House. Online athttp://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/press_release/fiw07_charts.pdf.Urban Population Living in Slums: United Nations Human SettlementsProgramme (UN-HABITAT). 2003. Slums <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong>: The Face <strong>of</strong> Urban Poverty in<strong>the</strong> New Millennium? Nairobi: UN-HABITAT. Online at http://www.unhabitat.org/publication/slumreport.pdf.Regulatory Barriers to Registering Property: <strong>World</strong> Bank Group. 2007.Doing Business Custom Datasets. Washington, DC: <strong>World</strong> Bank. Online athttp://www.doingbusiness.org/CustomQuery.Government Expenditures: Development Data Group, <strong>World</strong> Bank. 2007. 2007<strong>World</strong> Development Indicators. Washington, DC: <strong>World</strong> Bank. Online athttp://go.worldbank.org/B53SONGPA0.Status <strong>of</strong> FOI Legislation: Banisar, D. 2004. Freedom <strong>of</strong> Information and Accessto Government Records Around <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong>. Washington, DC: Privacy International.Online at http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/foia/foia-survey.html.Digital Access Index: International Telecommunications Union (ITU), 2003. <strong>World</strong>Telecommunication Development Report. Geneva: ITU. Online at http://www.itu.int/newsarchive/press_releases/2003/30.html.Corruption Perceptions Index: Transparency International. 2006. 2006 CorruptionPerceptions Index. Berlin: Transparency International. Online at http://www.transparency.org/policy_and_research/surveys_indices/cpi.T E C H N I C A L N O T E S : I N S T I T U T I O N S A N D G O V E R N A N C E221
- Page 1 and 2:
2008WORLDRESOURCESRoots ofResilienc
- Page 3:
WORLDRESOURCES2008
- Page 6 and 7:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 10 and 11:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 12 and 13:
Roots ofResilie
- Page 14 and 15:
Scaling up nature-based enterprises
- Page 16 and 17:
Examples of such economic and socia
- Page 18 and 19:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 20 and 21:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 22 and 23:
BOX 1.2 WHAT IS SCALING UP?10In gen
- Page 24:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 27 and 28:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 29 and 30:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 31 and 32:
S C A L I N G U P E C O S Y S T E M
- Page 33 and 34:
PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION LIVING UND
- Page 36 and 37:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 38 and 39:
Investing in the social capital of
- Page 40 and 41:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 42 and 43:
UPDATE: SCALING UP NAMIBIA’SCOMMU
- Page 44 and 45:
UPDATE: NAMIBIAincluding a limited
- Page 46 and 47:
UPDATE: NAMIBIAGROWTH IN COMMUNAL C
- Page 48 and 49:
UPDATE: NAMIBIATorra Conservancy su
- Page 50 and 51:
UPDATE: SCALING UP LOCAL MANAGEMENT
- Page 52 and 53:
UPDATE: FIJIextensively with the co
- Page 54 and 55:
UPDATE: FIJI42of the iqoliqoli comm
- Page 56 and 57:
UPDATE: FIJI2007a:iv). A separate s
- Page 58 and 59:
Scaling up environmental enterprise
- Page 60 and 61:
W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 62 and 63:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 64 and 65:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 66 and 67:
OWNERSHIP54W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 68 and 69:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 70 and 71:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 72 and 73:
BOX 2.1 LESSONS FROM THE EQUATOR IN
- Page 74 and 75:
OWNERSHIP62W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 76 and 77:
OWNERSHIPW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 78 and 79:
OWNERSHIP66give marginalized groups
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 2.2 LESSONS FROM THE FIELD:GENE
- Page 82 and 83:
Box 2.2 LESSONS FROM THE FIELD70It
- Page 84 and 85:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 86 and 87:
Box 2.3 WOMEN ON THE MOVE: SCALING
- Page 88 and 89:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 90 and 91:
BOX 2.4 WATERSHED ORGANISATION TRUS
- Page 92 and 93:
CAPACITY80W O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 94 and 95:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 96 and 97:
BOX 2.5LOCAL EMPOWERMENT, UPWARD IN
- Page 98 and 99:
CAPACITY86W O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 100 and 101:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 102 and 103:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 104 and 105:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 106 and 107:
CAPACITYW O R L D R E S O U R C E S
- Page 108 and 109:
CONNECTION96W O R L D R E S O U R C
- Page 110 and 111:
BOX 2.6CURING POVERTY?TAKING ADVANT
- Page 112 and 113:
BOX 2.7 ETHIOPIAN COFFEE COOPERATIV
- Page 114 and 115:
BOX 2.7 ETHIOPIAN COFFEE COOPERATIV
- Page 116 and 117:
CONNECTIONW O R L D R E S O U R C E
- Page 118 and 119:
CONNECTION106W O R L D R E S O U R
- Page 121 and 122:
B U I L D I N G O W N E R S H I P,
- Page 123 and 124:
ROUTESTORESILIENCEIN THIS REPORT WE
- Page 125 and 126:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 127 and 128:
Creating Institutions, Empowering C
- Page 129 and 130:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 131 and 132:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 133 and 134:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 135 and 136:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 137 and 138:
F I S H E R I E S F O R T H E F U T
- Page 139 and 140:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D Sregio
- Page 141 and 142:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SThe C
- Page 143 and 144:
Intermediaries Help Build Necessary
- Page 145 and 146:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SENTER
- Page 147 and 148:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D Sit to
- Page 149 and 150:
Chemonics and IRG 2000:A-V-2). Hist
- Page 151 and 152:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SLEARN
- Page 153 and 154:
G R E E NL I V E L I H O O D SAcros
- Page 155 and 156:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 157 and 158:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 159 and 160:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 161 and 162:
Demi-lunesAdding Value: Reclaiming
- Page 163 and 164:
Storing milletNationally, figures f
- Page 165 and 166:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 167 and 168:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 169 and 170:
T U R N I N G B A C K T H E D E S E
- Page 171 and 172:
DRIVINGTHESCALINGPROCESSC H A P T E
- Page 173 and 174:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 175 and 176:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 177 and 178:
The Lessons of PESThere are importa
- Page 179 and 180:
D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 181 and 182: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 183 and 184: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 185 and 186: MENT TO LOCAL HANDSare allowed to c
- Page 187 and 188: Revitalizing Rural Representationin
- Page 189 and 190: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 191 and 192: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 193 and 194: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 195 and 196: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 197 and 198: FIGURE 3 COST OF REMITTANCES TO MEX
- Page 199 and 200: D R I V I N G T H E S C A L I N G P
- Page 201 and 202: RECOMMENDATIONS:ADVANCINGENTERPRISE
- Page 203 and 204: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 205 and 206: PROJECTED CHANGES IN AGRICULTURE IN
- Page 207 and 208: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 209 and 210: 2. Provide Financial Support for Ne
- Page 211 and 212: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 213 and 214: R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S : A D
- Page 215 and 216: IIP A R T1Population and Human Well
- Page 217 and 218: abroad. In order to capture a count
- Page 219 and 220: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 221 and 222: Adult Literacy Rate: The availabili
- Page 223 and 224: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 225 and 226: Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
- Page 227 and 228: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 229 and 230: DATA RELIABILITY AND CAUTIONARY NOT
- Page 231: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 235 and 236: A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T SWorl
- Page 237 and 238: W O R L D R E S O U R C E S 2 0 0 8
- Page 239 and 240: and Environmental Management; Austr
- Page 241 and 242: R E F E R E N C E Shttp://www.water
- Page 243 and 244: R E F E R E N C E S■■■■■
- Page 245 and 246: R E F E R E N C E S■ Subedi, B.,
- Page 247 and 248: R E F E R E N C E S■■CARE Inter
- Page 249 and 250: R E F E R E N C E SChapter 3Banglad
- Page 251 and 252: R E F E R E N C E SIn Mission (SIM)
- Page 253 and 254: R E F E R E N C E S■■■■■
- Page 255 and 256: Box 4.2■■■Larson, A., and J.
- Page 257 and 258: IndexItalic page numbers refer to f
- Page 259 and 260: I N D E Xcross-cutting lessons from
- Page 261 and 262: I N D E XDemandconservancies as dem
- Page 263 and 264: I N D E XGThe Gambiacommunity fores
- Page 265 and 266: I N D E XInterAmerican Development
- Page 267 and 268: I N D E XMaya Biosphere Carbon Proj
- Page 269 and 270: I N D E XOrganizational scaling up,
- Page 271 and 272: I N D E XScaling up, 3-45, 189-201c
- Page 273 and 274: I N D E XUnited Nations Development
- Page 275 and 276: UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMM
- Page 277: WORLDRESOURCES200WORLDRESOURCES2008