Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute
Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute
Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
UPDATE: NAMIBIAGROWTH IN COMMUNAL CONSERVANCIES, 1998-2005TOTAL LAND AREA UNDER MANAGEMENTSquare kilometers120,000100,00080,00060,00040,00020,000POPULATION LIVING IN CONSERVANCY AREASNumber <strong>of</strong> people250,000200,000150,000100,00050,00001998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Source: NACSO 2006: 1201998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005The organic development <strong>of</strong> NACSO has allowed it to address<strong>the</strong> evolving challenges faced by communities. Over time,NACSO has worked to build ownership around wildlife managementin Namibia’s conservancies. This in turn has supported<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> local governance, as well as building <strong>the</strong>skills and capacities needed to manage wildlife productively for<strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community.Alongside NACSO’s evolution, <strong>the</strong> Namibia Community-BasedTourism Association has represented and supported <strong>the</strong>community tourism enterprises sprouting up within conservancies.Currently <strong>the</strong>re are 108 such conservancy-ownedenterprises working solely within <strong>the</strong> conservancy boundaries,with varying levels <strong>of</strong> success (WWF et al. 2007:92–93).NACOBTA has worked to improve local business skills and, withits membership in NACSO and engagement with <strong>the</strong> NamibianINCOME FROM CONSERVANCIES AND OTHER COMMUNITY-BASED NATURALRESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN NAMIBIA, 1994-2005Million Namibian dollars252015105government, has also helped bridge <strong>the</strong> gap between nationalpolicy and local needs.Funding and facilitating <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> NACSO have been anumber <strong>of</strong> international partners, such as <strong>the</strong> United StatesAgency for International Development (USAID) and <strong>the</strong> <strong>World</strong>Wildlife Fund (WWF). From <strong>the</strong> beginning, <strong>the</strong>se organizationshave been crucial in supporting governance innovations such as<strong>the</strong> Nature Conservation Act, which provided <strong>the</strong> legal foundationfor <strong>the</strong> conservancy program, and in providing guidance onestablishing community-based wildlife management enterprises(NACSO 2006:15, 19, 55). They have also been veryeffective at documenting <strong>the</strong> Namibian conservancy movementand advertising it within <strong>the</strong> international development communityas a model for sustainable environmental management andrural development. This has both streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>the</strong> politicalposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conservancy programIncome from CBNRMactivities outside <strong>of</strong>conservanciesNon-case income toconservanciesCash income toconservancieswithin <strong>the</strong> Namibian government andhelped it gain <strong>the</strong> necessary financialresources from o<strong>the</strong>r internationaldonors to cover <strong>the</strong> considerablestartup costs <strong>of</strong> new conservancies.One downside to <strong>the</strong> current fundingformula is that it has created a certaindegree <strong>of</strong> dependence on externaldonors, whose funding levels are nowdeclining. This challenges <strong>the</strong> NACSOorganizations to develop alternatefunding sources so that <strong>the</strong>y cancontinue <strong>the</strong>ir current level <strong>of</strong> supportto conservancies (Jones 2008).3401994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Source: NACSO 2006: 45