10.07.2015 Views

Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute

Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute

Growing the Wealth of the Poor - World Resources Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Lessons <strong>of</strong> PESThere are important lessons from this and o<strong>the</strong>r PES experiences,as well as from <strong>the</strong> community-based natural resourcemanagement enterprises described in this report, that couldhelp orient REDD so it can better achieve its goals. By framingREDD initiatives as both pro-poor and pro-environmentprojects, unintended consequences that could undermine <strong>the</strong>project in <strong>the</strong> future have a better chance <strong>of</strong> being avoided. TheUganda example makes it clear, for instance, that tenure andgovernance issues cannot be ignored. Creating a community“stake” in a project nurtures <strong>the</strong> self-interest that inspirescommunity involvement and responsibility.Ano<strong>the</strong>r lesson is that payments to communities under a REDDcompensation scheme must be substantial enough to make adifference in <strong>the</strong> household incomes <strong>of</strong> community members,who o<strong>the</strong>rwise are unlikely to participate in <strong>the</strong> program or followthrough on <strong>the</strong>ir commitments. This compensation may come asmonetary payments, but it can also be complemented by capacitytraining or support to develop alternative enterprises.One way to make REDD’s goal <strong>of</strong> reducing deforestation moreamenable to low-income families is to allow <strong>the</strong>m to pursuecomplementary land uses such as agr<strong>of</strong>orestry, <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong>non-timber forest products, and perhaps even limited timberharvesting. This recognizes <strong>the</strong> fact that poor families areunlikely to be able to live on PES payments alone and mustpursue o<strong>the</strong>r activities to round out <strong>the</strong>ir livelihoods. The goalshould be to make <strong>the</strong>se activities as compatible with carbonstorage as possible.A third lesson is that entry costs to participate in REDDprograms—such as licensing and certification costs—must below if poor people are to participate. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, only largelandowners will be able to join. Prohibitively high entry costspose a particular problem in cases <strong>of</strong> contested tenure. Largelandowners who can afford <strong>the</strong> certification costs may stakeclaims over contested lands, <strong>the</strong>reby turning REDD into a toolto solidify land claims where tenure has been unclear.Community-Based Forestry: A REDD PrimerThe international development community has a central role toplay in assuring that REDD is carried out in an effective andpro-poor manner, first by supporting community-based forestry.Providing this support can bring economic and social benefitsto communities while reducing carbon emissions. Communityforestry projects can also help build <strong>the</strong> capacities andresilience <strong>of</strong> forest communities, making <strong>the</strong>m more capable <strong>of</strong>handling a REDD project down <strong>the</strong> line. And such efforts neednot wait for REDD’s complicated technical questions to besorted out.NGOs might also work to establish performance metrics forcarbon mitigation that do not rely entirely on precise calculations<strong>of</strong> emissions created by deforestation. Such metrics could helpdeveloping countries to receive international funding outside <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> global carbon market—whe<strong>the</strong>r through bilateral or multilateralsupport, or through a global funding mechanism—byreducing <strong>the</strong>ir emissions, but without <strong>the</strong> stringent technicalrequirements imposed by REDD (Daviet et al. 2007: 5-8).Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and sustainable harvesting within community forestswould likely fit more easily into such performance metrics.Finally, NGOs and donors can assist in developing social andenvironmental standards for REDD, using established community-basedforestry programs to design social protocols and totest carbon release monitoring techniques. Doing so will meanthat if REDD becomes part <strong>of</strong> global carbon mitigation, communities,donors, governments, and NGOs will already haveexperience with effectively reducing carbon emissions whileimproving local economies and increasing social resilience.Building enterprises through community management <strong>of</strong>natural resources will certainly not solve all <strong>the</strong> challenges thatREDD faces as a global PES system. Nor will it quickly resultin <strong>the</strong> large-scale projects that climate experts claim arerequired to make a significant reduction in carbon emissions.Yet <strong>the</strong>se enterprises can be encouraged right now – and <strong>the</strong>ycan help meet REDD’s major environmental aim while simultaneouslyserving as a training ground to work out some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>program’s technical issues. In this way, community management<strong>of</strong> natural resources effectively stands at <strong>the</strong> intersection<strong>of</strong> climate adaptation, carbon mitigation, and rural development.A well-designed REDD program may serve as one <strong>of</strong> anumber <strong>of</strong> financial incentives to promote <strong>the</strong>se managementefforts in <strong>the</strong> future.165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!