21.11.2012 Views

Wireless Future - Telenor

Wireless Future - Telenor

Wireless Future - Telenor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142<br />

Box 2 – ETNO Declaration<br />

We, the 45 member companies of the European Public Telecommunications<br />

Network Operators’ Association, welcome efforts by the ITU-T sector to develop<br />

global standards which could have a strong impact on the future of our industry.<br />

We have been in Montreal this week to underline our support for the work of the<br />

ITU, which provides for a unique global partnership between governments and<br />

industry.<br />

However, we believe that the ITU-T should be a more commercially oriented<br />

organization designed to promote telecommunication services of value for both<br />

developed and developing countries. Necessary changes should be implemented<br />

rapidly as our member companies must deal with the realities of today’s<br />

fast-changing marketplace.<br />

At week’s end, we remain seriously concerned over the exceedingly slow pace<br />

of change that does not reflect the “drastic changes” called for by the Secretary<br />

General of the ITU at the outset of this assembly. For the ITU to remain relevant,<br />

the industry sector must be given a stronger voice. Far too much debate<br />

during this assembly has been taken up with procedural matters rather than<br />

focusing on technical standardisation issues.<br />

For the first time ever, some of our member companies are not participating in<br />

this assembly out of frustration with the slow pace of the ITU reform process.<br />

The next plenipotentiary gathering in Morocco will be critical to the future of the<br />

ITU. Unless we see more evidence of meaningful reform, our member companies<br />

will increasingly consider other standardisation bodies to develop specifications<br />

and standards.<br />

Still we rely on the understanding and sense of compromise of a majority of<br />

visionary member states that will allow the ITU-T to develop into a more efficient<br />

standardisation body without detracting from the ITU’s strength and values also<br />

fully recognised by ETNO Members. We would also like to express our sincere<br />

appreciation for those member states who support us in finding a good way for<br />

acting together in the future.<br />

Montreal,<br />

October 2000<br />

tion is expressed in the various phases of the<br />

procedure, a Recommendation might be approved<br />

within two months from the time when<br />

the text is mature.<br />

The AAP will be applicable upon the termination<br />

of the WTSA. It remains to be seen whether<br />

the AAP will be successfully applied in the T-<br />

Sector. The TSB will make use of electronic<br />

means in the consultation of Member States and<br />

Sector Members.<br />

7 Associates<br />

The Plenipotentiary Conference, Minneapolis,<br />

1998, introduced a new category of participants<br />

known as Associates to enable small entities or<br />

organisations to take part in the work of ITU’s<br />

three sectors. WTSA confirmed that Associates<br />

are entitled to take part in the work of one<br />

selected single Study Group of ITU-T. The<br />

WTSA participants hope that this new category<br />

of membership will encourage smaller compa-<br />

nies, institutions and organisations to take part<br />

in ITU-T activities. The Council has decided<br />

that the annual amount of financial contribution<br />

for Associates will be 10,500 Swiss Francs (1/6<br />

of the 2001 financial contribution of a Sector<br />

Member).<br />

8 Resolution on ITU-T Reform<br />

It was agreed that WTSA should offer an opinion<br />

and advice on the future organisation of<br />

global standardisation activities as an input to<br />

the ongoing work of ITU’s Working Group on<br />

ITU Reform (WGR) to consider a new global<br />

standardisation entity under the umbrella of ITU.<br />

The European contribution endorsed the idea<br />

that all technical standardisation in the ITU<br />

should take place in one single body and secondly,<br />

that a possible new entity dealing with<br />

global standardisation should be within the ITU,<br />

but not necessarily within the ITU-T as proposed<br />

by Canada.<br />

The WTSA adopted a resolution focusing on<br />

issues relating to technical standardisation and<br />

lists a number of key attributes considered<br />

important for the successful continuation of a<br />

global standardisation body such as openness,<br />

transparency, visibility, consensus based<br />

approval and responsiveness to the needs both of<br />

the market and the developing countries. TSAG<br />

is encouraged to support the work of the Working<br />

Group on ITU Reform and Member States<br />

are requested to make input on these issues to<br />

the next Plenipotentiary Conference.<br />

9 Draft Recommendation Diii<br />

on International Internet<br />

Connection<br />

In exceptional cases draft Recommendations are<br />

submitted to WTSA for approval. There is a tendency<br />

that this procedure is used for contentious<br />

draft Recommendations. At a WTSA approval<br />

by formal vote can be done by simple majority.<br />

The draft Recommendation Diii on cost sharing<br />

for international Internet traffic was one of the<br />

most controversial issues of the whole Assembly.<br />

The Recommendation put forward by SG3<br />

aimed at setting down a principle for the equitable<br />

cost sharing of international Internet connections.<br />

The opponents to the Recommendation<br />

feared that the Recommendation might impact<br />

on the development of the Internet if it imposed<br />

a given result on commercially negotiated agreements.<br />

There was a sharp divide between the US<br />

and a number of industrialised countries and the<br />

rest of the world. Europe’s proposal of an alternative<br />

text was rejected. It would have been<br />

preferable to have the text sent back to the SG<br />

for further work.<br />

Telektronikk 1.2001

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!