Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
signals can be made on one side only, at the<br />
receiver, where the channel can be easily measured.<br />
If available, the transmitter weights could<br />
be used in a joint transmit-receive optimisation<br />
to maximise the wanted powers. The formulation<br />
in equations 4 and 5 is of course equivalent<br />
to the angular description above, but it leads to<br />
the more normal situation in Figure 2 where<br />
there is a multitude of rays, and there is no<br />
chance with a few elements to put many nulls in<br />
the radiation pattern. The key point is that it is<br />
not necessary to do so. The description in equations<br />
4 and 5 is still valid so it is still possible to<br />
choose the weight factors appropriately to separate<br />
the two data streams and increase the capacity.<br />
Physically we can explain the situation as<br />
putting the unwanted signal in a deep fade instead<br />
of a null in a radiation pattern, the result is<br />
the same. Note that the scattering from widely<br />
separated scatterers is a necessity for the increased<br />
capacity; a line-of-sight situation where<br />
the two antenna arrays see each other directly<br />
would only lead to one channel, although with a<br />
larger gain. This follows directly from Shannon<br />
where the capacity in bits/s/Hz for independent<br />
parallel channels is given by<br />
�<br />
C = N log2 1+ (6)<br />
where P is the power over noise, or SNR, divided<br />
equally over the channels. The expression<br />
grows with N, the more so the larger P is, but the<br />
beauty of the array solution is that antenna gain<br />
will also grow with N, so we end up with the<br />
following<br />
P<br />
�<br />
N<br />
C = N log 2 (1 + P) (7)<br />
Telektronikk 1.2001<br />
90<br />
120 60<br />
2<br />
150 1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
210<br />
240<br />
270<br />
300<br />
30<br />
Beam 1<br />
0<br />
330<br />
Beam 2<br />
Figure 1a A simple example with two scatterers widely<br />
separated. The antennas are multibeam antennas with<br />
two beams, the blue ones (beam 1) having a null in the<br />
radiation pattern in the direction of beam 2, and vice<br />
versa. The antennas only have two elements, so they cannot<br />
also have a maximum in the wanted direction. The system has<br />
doubled the capacity, since the transmissions take place at the<br />
same frequency<br />
Multibeam antenna<br />
with complex<br />
antenna weights<br />
W 1<br />
W 2<br />
Thus parallelism is a very promising technique,<br />
it can only be realised in scattering environments<br />
with wide angular spreads, and multiple antennas<br />
at both ends are needed.<br />
Although we have seen that only the receiver<br />
array has to know the channel, it is an advantage<br />
to let the transmitter array know the channel as<br />
well, which would increase the P in eq. (7). The<br />
information must in all cases be spread over the<br />
transmit elements, and considerable research has<br />
gone into finding optimum ways to do this using<br />
so-called space-time coding (Tarokh et al [8]).<br />
Foschini [1] and Winters [2] realised that this<br />
situation could also be created with closely<br />
spaced elements in a scattering environment,<br />
where the scatterers would act as angularly<br />
widely spread parasitic elements of the array.<br />
90<br />
120 60<br />
2<br />
150<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
30<br />
0.5<br />
180<br />
0<br />
210<br />
240<br />
270<br />
300<br />
330<br />
Figure 1b Two independent<br />
data streams are sent out and<br />
received over both antennas,<br />
and the weights are chosen<br />
such that there is isolation<br />
between the two beams<br />
41