12.07.2015 Views

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BODERLINE EUROPEANS: NATIONALISMS AND FUNDAMENTALISMS 141support?) —<strong>and</strong> educational action (what generalised identity socializationshould be promoted?).The other religion I previously mentioned is Islam. Whilst one tends tothink that Christian fundamentalism has significantly decreased, peopletend to believe that, on the contrary, Muslim fundamentalism is strong<strong>and</strong> even becoming stronger. It is true that Muslim cultures, as opposed to<strong>European</strong> Christian culture, have not experienced secularization fromwithin; that they might see it as something external that is subtlyimposed, so the fundamentalist reaction can be linked to defencemechanisms against the enemy lived with greater intensity. In any case,given that at least in the present-day <strong>European</strong> Union there are noMuslim States, Muslim fundamentalism is basically present throughimmigrants of this creed <strong>and</strong> their descendants. What incidence mightthis have with regards to the construction of <strong>European</strong> identity? I willalso confine myself to a few remarks on this issue.The possible Muslim fundamentalism in the <strong>European</strong> Union do nothave the reference of a State with this denomination <strong>and</strong>, thus, it willinitially be an intra-cultural type of fundamentalism: a version of thedogmatic <strong>and</strong> domineering religion imposed on its members. It may see,in the modern cultural Christian context surrounding it, an enemy thatneeds to be fought, <strong>and</strong> from there degenerate —setting aside thelegitimate questions of civil society— into dangerous confrontations.When both ad intra <strong>and</strong> ad extra fundamentalism violate human rights,public authorities must intervene, although it must be acknowledgedthat there are hazy areas in which things are not quite clear <strong>and</strong> which,consequently, ought to be jointly debated.We should never fall into the temptation of associating Islam withfundamentalism. As Christianity, Islam is lived <strong>and</strong> can be lived in a nonfundamentalist,<strong>and</strong> thus, perfectly acceptable way. The nonfundamentalistMuslim option has various possibilities within the<strong>European</strong> context. One of them is multiculturalism. Obtaining inspirationfrom authors like Kymlicka 7 we could define it in the following way:these immigrant groups with specific ethnic identities are asked tointegrate socially <strong>and</strong> politically into liberal democratic values <strong>and</strong> theirinstitutions (coherence in this must lead to recognition of full citizenship)<strong>and</strong> they are offered respect <strong>and</strong> even protection of significant aspectsof their ethnocultural diversity (if necessary with public support, whichought to be discerned so that promotion of social equality does not7Of course, every person as such —no matter his or her cultural origin: Christian,Muslim or other— must have the right to leave <strong>and</strong> join cultural groups. Here I amrather describing collective options.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!