12.07.2015 Views

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EUROPE, FROM THE INSTITUTIONAL REFERENT THE PERSONAL REFERENT: ... 77subsidiarity, the enlargement of the Third sector, the evolution ofvoluntary enlistment <strong>and</strong> on the sources of contribution of personalservices.Governance, or better yet, good governance, should be groundedon a secure, flexible, transparent <strong>and</strong> competent framework; composedof a legitimised worldwide government <strong>and</strong> a responsible <strong>and</strong> committedcivil society, acting not in its own interests, but rather in those of thecommon Good, of collective interests. A great deal has been written ona certain coincidence between social good <strong>and</strong> personal good with theconviction that if the opposition is exaggerated, personal good, whichwe are accustomed to seeing as separate with its own conditions <strong>and</strong>precise rules, will end up on the losing end.It is necessary to revitalize public institutions that know how torecognize <strong>and</strong> to legitimate other spaces of confrontation <strong>and</strong> decisionmaking. If a centralized role is conserved, it must be to safeguard thecoherence of local policies with global guidelines in defence of humanrights <strong>and</strong> for the recognition of each one’s obligations.In today’s society, we are witnessing too often the predominance ofbipolar logic, conflicts <strong>and</strong> competitions where there is a clear winner<strong>and</strong> loser.In a logic of governance 9 it is necessary to engage in the politics ofcollaboration, cooperation, mediation <strong>and</strong> the negotiation of conflictinginterests.This does not mean lowering commitments <strong>and</strong> renouncing ethicalcriterion of choice, but it does mean creating a table of dialogue forparticipatory policy management <strong>and</strong> recognizing wide-rangingauthority, quality leadership founded on competences <strong>and</strong> an encounterbetween different entities. In the past few years, we have learned tofine tune the techniques <strong>and</strong> styles of the art of negotiating, whichmight be a good reference point in the partnership between differentforces.One can speak of Good governance at various levels of organizationalcomplexity: micro, middle <strong>and</strong> macro. The dynamics <strong>and</strong> assumptions9There are diverse interpretations of good governance ranging from the Egovernment proposed by the Italian Government for public administrations ofdeveloping countries to grass-roots proposals raised for non-hierarchical co-partnershipin government politics (Charter of the New Municipality drawn up in Porto Alegre inBrazil). Behind the interpretative framework pursued, one discovers cultural paradigmswith different reference points ranging from prêt-á-porter solutions or keys in the h<strong>and</strong>sof expert statisticians, to work hypotheses <strong>and</strong> praxis that mature en a constant relationbetween giver <strong>and</strong> receiver, donor <strong>and</strong> donee, in the framework of a relationship ofreciprocity <strong>and</strong> equal opportunity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!