12.07.2015 Views

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DILEMMAS AND TASK IN THE FORMATION OF EDUCATION-BASED ... 161<strong>European</strong> society, <strong>and</strong> stereotypes of masculinity <strong>and</strong> femininity nolonger closely define our own behavioural expectations —or those thatare imposed on us by others. The end of the <strong>European</strong> overseasempires has resulted in a new set of roles, less certain than before,between the former colonial powers <strong>and</strong> the former colonies, <strong>and</strong>between the peoples of both. Globalisation <strong>and</strong> the growth of multinationalbusiness has left national states less able to defend their ownsocial <strong>and</strong> economic interests, <strong>and</strong> enmeshed more <strong>and</strong> more firmly in theeconomic world system —<strong>and</strong> this internationalisation of trade,commerce <strong>and</strong> culture makes for further imprecision about how wedefine ourselves. Finally, <strong>and</strong> not least, the advent of the new informationcommunication technologies mean that the individual no longer needsubscribe to either local or to mass cultures in the same way as wasnecessary in the past: we can personalise our own individual culturalreferences. The rise of a pervasive consumer culture has led to agreater focus on individualism. <strong>Identity</strong> now becomes multiple, <strong>and</strong>more contingent <strong>and</strong> situational.Because of these changes, children <strong>and</strong> young people who arecurrently being educated, <strong>and</strong> those in the future, are likely to have avery different civic relationship between themselves as individuals <strong>and</strong>their society. This will not be the same citizenship, or the same kind ofidentity, as that of their parents or teachers —or politicians. Thoseresponsible for the social education of the young will need to reflecton, but not simply reflect, the social relationships of earlier ages. Thishas implications, challenges <strong>and</strong> problems for educators. Teachingchildren to be ready for new <strong>and</strong> changing social structures, groupings<strong>and</strong> identities will be difficult enough, but educators may also beworking in tension with some of the beliefs, values <strong>and</strong> wishes ofchildren’s parents <strong>and</strong> other members of the older generations. Thetask for educators is one of transformation, not reproduction, ofcreating the new, not filling children up with the old. This is, in a veryreal sense, a political task.Harold Lasswell, the American political psychologists, definedpolitics as «Who gets what, when, how» (Lasswell, 1936). Who shouldget citizenship education? Who should give it? When should it begiven? What should it consist of? How should it be given?Who should get it is clear: this is a political decision —it is foreveryone. Any form of democracy requires an informed <strong>and</strong> participatingcitizenry. Any form of citizenship education must be for all children <strong>and</strong>young people (<strong>and</strong>, indeed, for all adults). This also implies, incidentally,that it is an area in which we also desire all to be successful in theirlearning. We do not want courses of study that result in failure —this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!