12.07.2015 Views

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHAT WE MEAN WHEN WE SAY EUROPE 47As <strong>European</strong>s supposedly confident about the EU’s capacity to fulfiltheir expectations regarding the EU, we insist on the need to strengthenthe values that, as aforementioned, have identified Europe during thecourse of its history. It is necessary to act swiftly: “If, in the next tenyears —Delors stated in the mid-nineties— we have not succeeding ingiving a spirit, a soul to Europe, we will have lost the game.” 29 A littlelater, the former German chancellor, Schmidt, expressed a similarconcern about Europe’s beings: “No society can live at long-term peacewith itself without a minimum of ethics. Nor will the EU be able tolastingly remain united without a minimum of ethical consensus in<strong>European</strong> nations. In the past, it was not only the Churches who werebearers of ethical st<strong>and</strong>ards, but philosophers, universities, the greatscholars <strong>and</strong> the great educators. In the 20 th century, things changed.[…] Europe needs commonly accepted ethics covering both rights <strong>and</strong>obligations. In fact these common ethics, carried on from past centuries,largely exist, although more so in people’s unconscious. I believe it isdesirable that spiritual <strong>and</strong> political leaders make ethics emerge in the<strong>European</strong> public conscience.” 30However, are these viable approaches in a Europe where it seemseconomic <strong>and</strong> financial interests predominate, where violence,xenophobia <strong>and</strong> terrorism proliferate, or where the excluded are agrowing reality? In the questioning words of the young in the debateabout the future of Europe: Quo vadis, Europa?In order to be valid, the answer must be dem<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> not fearfulof the transformations that our society of the beginning of the XXI st centuryrequires. The globalization we are involved in drags all the burden ofthe past along with it, for which we are largely responsible. Neverthelessit offers new opportunities for change.If we are convinced that the EU is based on principles “of freedom,democracy, respect for human rights <strong>and</strong> for fundamental liberties <strong>and</strong>the rule of law, let us turn these principles into a st<strong>and</strong>ard of behaviourfavouring “the fight against all forms of prejudice <strong>and</strong> exclusion, be iteconomic, ethnic, cultural or racial.” 31 The reflection about the Europeof the future should bring about a committed attitude about the scopeof the principles that we have placed at the foundation of ourbehaviour <strong>and</strong> that make up the substance of our identity.29Jacques Delors in a private interview with the Churches, 1994, collected by MarcLuyckx, in op. cit., p. 129.30Op. cit., p. 193.31In the Novamerica magazine, no. 93, cit., p. 143, an interview with Cecilia Mariz.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!