12.07.2015 Views

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

European Identity - Individual, Group and Society - HumanitarianNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

262 EUROPEAN IDENTITY. INDIVIDUAL, GROUP AND SOCIETYThe downfall of the Ottoman Empire put an end to the panislamicutopia, <strong>and</strong> the abolition of the caliphate in 1924 by Kemal Atartukmarked the triumph of the “Europeist” tendency that would develop ina Nation-State setting. The influence the liberal, secular <strong>and</strong> nationalist<strong>European</strong> model among the new Muslim elite gained ground amongthe ruling elite, although it found resistance <strong>and</strong> pressure on the part ofmany Muslim sectors 15 . Nevertheless, the first constitutionalist projectswere short-lived <strong>and</strong> on many occasions, the Egyptian Constitution of1879 case in point, never reached full force because of the interferencesby the French <strong>and</strong> English who saw these projects as a threat to theircontrol over Egypt.Several elements brought about the discredit of colonial Europe:the ambivalent effects of colonization, the creation of artificial stateswhose borders reflected Europe’s interests, <strong>European</strong> interference indomestic political affairs, <strong>and</strong> the contradiction between an emancipating<strong>and</strong> rationalist discourse —freedom, equality <strong>and</strong> rationality—, <strong>and</strong> theircolonial behaviour. Said discredit would later determine the domesticevolution of the Muslim world <strong>and</strong> would cultivate a new perception ofthe <strong>European</strong> world <strong>and</strong> of Western values which would shape theimage of a hostile Europe.The origins of this image were located in the West’s inability tounderst<strong>and</strong> the effects, namely social destructurization <strong>and</strong> culturalexpropriation, that the exclusion of cultural <strong>and</strong> linguistic codes had oncolonized societies.Between the two world wars <strong>and</strong> in the presence of a loss ofEurope’s prestige, nationalism gained strength, which was favoured bythe colonizing action itself.The “Europeist” elite who established the liberal system byimitation, ignored one very crucial aspect: that the adopted <strong>European</strong>political system must be adjusted <strong>and</strong> respond to the socioeconomic<strong>and</strong> cultural realities of the societies to which it is applied. The lure ofthe West generated a political elite that was more <strong>and</strong> more unconcernedabout the cultural legacy of Islam The absence of socioeconomicreforms benefiting the people <strong>and</strong> the corrupt practices of itsleaders led to the discredit of the political system, <strong>and</strong> the growingunrest manifested itself in successive military attacks that would laterfavour the permanence of the Army in power.It was the distorted <strong>and</strong> incomplete nature of the capitalisttransformation of Muslim society that obstructed the path towards a15Laurens, H. (1993) L’Orient Arabe. Arabisme et Islamisme de 1798 à 1945. Paris,Arm<strong>and</strong> Colin.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!